public inbox for linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
To: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: "Maciej S . Szmigiero" <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@wdc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 0/7] Improve libata support for FUA
Date: Tue,  3 Jan 2023 14:19:17 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230103051924.233796-1-damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com> (raw)

These patches cleanup and improve libata support for ATA devices
supporting the FUA feature.

The first patch modifies the block layer to prevent the use of REQ_FUA
with read requests. This is necessary as the block layer code expect
REQ_FUA to be used with write requests (the flush machinery cannot
enforce access to the media for FUA read commands) and FUA is not
supported with ATA devices when NCQ is not enabled (device queue depth
set to 1).

Patch 2 and 3 are libata cleanup preparatory patches. Patch 4 cleans up
the detection for FUA support. Patch 5 fixes building a taskfile for FUA
write requests. Patch 6 prevents the use of FUA with known bad drives.

Finally, patch 7 enables FUA support by default in libata for devices
supporting this features.

Changes from v6:
 - Modified patch 1 to include checks for REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND
 - Addressed comments from Niklas (patch 2 -> return false, patch 3 ->
   commit message typo, patch 7 -> more verbose commit message)

Changes from v5:
 - Removed WARN for FUA reads in patch 5.
 - Added reviewed-by tags.

Changes from v4:
 - Changed patch 1 to the one suggested by Christoph.
 - Added Hannes review tag.

Changes from v3:
 - Added patch 1 to prevent any block device user from issuing a
   REQ_FUA read.
 - Changed patch 5 to remove the check for REQ_FUA read and also remove 
   support for ATA_CMD_WRITE_MULTI_FUA_EXT as this command is obsolete
   in recent ACS specifications.

Changes from v2:
 - Added patch 1 and 2 as preparatory patches
 - Added patch 4 to fix FUA writes handling for the non-ncq case. Note
   that it is possible that the drives blacklisted in patch 5 are
   actually OK since the code back in 2012 had the issue with the wrong
   use of LBA 28 commands for FUA writes.

Changes from v1:
 - Removed Maciej's patch 2. Instead, blacklist drives which are known
   to have a buggy FUA support.

Christoph Hellwig (1):
  block: add a sanity check for non-write flush/fua bios

Damien Le Moal (6):
  ata: libata: Introduce ata_ncq_supported()
  ata: libata: Rename and cleanup ata_rwcmd_protocol()
  ata: libata: cleanup fua support detection
  ata: libata: Fix FUA handling in ata_build_rw_tf()
  ata: libata: blacklist FUA support for known buggy drives
  ata: libata: Enable fua support by default

 .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         |  3 +
 block/blk-core.c                              | 14 ++--
 drivers/ata/libata-core.c                     | 73 ++++++++++++++-----
 drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c                     | 30 +-------
 include/linux/libata.h                        | 36 ++++++---
 5 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)

-- 
2.39.0


             reply	other threads:[~2023-01-03  5:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-03  5:19 Damien Le Moal [this message]
2023-01-03  5:19 ` [PATCH v7 1/7] block: add a sanity check for non-write flush/fua bios Damien Le Moal
2023-01-03  8:05   ` Niklas Cassel
2023-01-03 12:46     ` Damien Le Moal
2023-01-03 13:02   ` Niklas Cassel
2023-01-04 14:23   ` Ming Lei
2023-01-05  3:54     ` Damien Le Moal
2023-01-03  5:19 ` [PATCH v7 2/7] ata: libata: Introduce ata_ncq_supported() Damien Le Moal
2023-01-03  5:19 ` [PATCH v7 3/7] ata: libata: Rename and cleanup ata_rwcmd_protocol() Damien Le Moal
2023-01-03  5:19 ` [PATCH v7 4/7] ata: libata: cleanup fua support detection Damien Le Moal
2023-01-03  5:19 ` [PATCH v7 5/7] ata: libata: Fix FUA handling in ata_build_rw_tf() Damien Le Moal
2023-01-03  5:19 ` [PATCH v7 6/7] ata: libata: blacklist FUA support for known buggy drives Damien Le Moal
2023-01-03  5:19 ` [PATCH v7 7/7] ata: libata: Enable fua support by default Damien Le Moal
2023-01-04 16:49 ` [PATCH v7 0/7] Improve libata support for FUA Tejun Heo
2023-01-05  3:43   ` Damien Le Moal
2023-01-05 18:15     ` Tejun Heo
2023-01-06  6:51       ` Damien Le Moal
2023-01-06 18:03         ` Tejun Heo
2023-01-10 13:23           ` Damien Le Moal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230103051924.233796-1-damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
    --to=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
    --cc=niklas.cassel@wdc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox