From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Tommy Kelly <linux@tkel.ly>, Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/4] ata: fix deferred QC handling for port multipliers
Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 09:38:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260514073858.1175072-6-cassel@kernel.org> (raw)
Hello all,
Tommy Kelly reported a regression with PMP that use CBS:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ide/ce09cc21-a8e9-4845-b205-35411e22fba9@tkel.ly/
It turns out that the ap->excl_link logic used for PMP that use CBS is
incompatible with the deferred qc issuing via a workqueue.
This is fixed in patch 3/4.
While looking at the code, it turns out that the deferred qc issuing via
workqueue is misdesigned. It assumed that we can't mix NCQ and non-NCQ
commands on the same port. The limitation is that you can not mix NCQ and
non-NCQ commands on the same drive. However, with a PMP with FBS, you can
issue (mixed NCQ and non-NCQ commands) to the different drives. Thus, move
the saved deferred QC from struct ata_port to struct ata_link. This is
fixed in patch 4/4.
Changes since v4:
-Fix ATA_DEFER_LINK_EXCL to use the correct goto label. While refactoring,
I accidentally used the wrong label goto defer_qc instead of goto free_qc,
which of course broke PMP CBS in v4.
Niklas Cassel (4):
ata: libata-scsi: improve readability of ata_scsi_qc_issue()
ata: libata-scsi: do not use the deferred QC feature for
ATA_DEFER_PORT
ata: libata-scsi: do not use the deferred QC feature on PMPs with CBS
ata: libata-scsi: do not needlessly defer commands when using PMP with
FBS
drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 9 ++--
drivers/ata/libata-eh.c | 8 ++--
drivers/ata/libata-pmp.c | 18 +++++++-
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
drivers/ata/sata_sil24.c | 6 ++-
include/linux/libata.h | 7 +--
6 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
base-commit: 0926c1b731b73e7296e4ad4f7d055918e16ae6ab
--
2.54.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-05-14 7:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-14 7:38 Niklas Cassel [this message]
2026-05-14 7:38 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] ata: libata-scsi: improve readability of ata_scsi_qc_issue() Niklas Cassel
2026-05-14 7:39 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] ata: libata-scsi: do not use the deferred QC feature for ATA_DEFER_PORT Niklas Cassel
2026-05-14 7:39 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] ata: libata-scsi: do not use the deferred QC feature on PMPs with CBS Niklas Cassel
2026-05-14 7:39 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] ata: libata-scsi: do not needlessly defer commands when using PMP with FBS Niklas Cassel
2026-05-14 10:43 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] ata: fix deferred QC handling for port multipliers Tommy Kelly
2026-05-14 11:17 ` Niklas Cassel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260514073858.1175072-6-cassel@kernel.org \
--to=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@tkel.ly \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox