* Re: patch fix for intel sdd s3500 series on Sil3512 controller [not found] ` <20140324141558.31c169cf@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk> @ 2014-03-24 15:27 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz 2014-03-27 0:11 ` David F. 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz @ 2014-03-24 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: One Thousand Gnomes; +Cc: David F., linux-kernel, linux-ide + linux-ide mailing list on Cc: On Monday, March 24, 2014 02:15:58 PM One Thousand Gnomes wrote: > On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 16:32:54 -0700 > "David F." <df7729@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > It appears if nIEN is set all polling type IO fails. After an > > attempt, future non-polled communications also fails. This patch > > allows it to work. Not sure if any spin lock protection would be > > needed or the system already handles the device existence for the > > generated irq with polling enabled. handler already ignored irq if > > queued command was polling type. > > Does it behave plugged into a different controller without the hacks ? > > Alan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: patch fix for intel sdd s3500 series on Sil3512 controller 2014-03-24 15:27 ` patch fix for intel sdd s3500 series on Sil3512 controller Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz @ 2014-03-27 0:11 ` David F. 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: David F. @ 2014-03-27 0:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz; +Cc: One Thousand Gnomes, linux-kernel, linux-ide Yes. The drive was found fine on other controllers I tried it on. On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> wrote: > > + linux-ide mailing list on Cc: > > On Monday, March 24, 2014 02:15:58 PM One Thousand Gnomes wrote: >> On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 16:32:54 -0700 >> "David F." <df7729@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > It appears if nIEN is set all polling type IO fails. After an >> > attempt, future non-polled communications also fails. This patch >> > allows it to work. Not sure if any spin lock protection would be >> > needed or the system already handles the device existence for the >> > generated irq with polling enabled. handler already ignored irq if >> > queued command was polling type. >> >> Does it behave plugged into a different controller without the hacks ? >> >> Alan > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-03-27 0:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <CAGRSmLtifL=hFBP1AUHB_va6ZvNfqXo8Bu=6XciH--jOEYVJjQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20140324141558.31c169cf@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk>
2014-03-24 15:27 ` patch fix for intel sdd s3500 series on Sil3512 controller Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2014-03-27 0:11 ` David F.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox