From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>,
Xingui Yang <yangxingui@huawei.com>,
jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, hare@suse.com, hch@lst.de
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxarm@huawei.com, prime.zeng@hisilicon.com,
kangfenglong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] scsi: libsas: Directly kick-off EH when ATA device fell off
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 08:00:43 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4489f80f-9f39-8f3f-5d10-6b113131e65c@opensource.wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <257dcd6c-2ffd-f518-9b13-c309348088d9@oracle.com>
On 12/20/22 00:55, John Garry wrote:
> On 19/12/2022 15:28, Jason Yan wrote:
>>>> + if (test_bit(SAS_DEV_GONE, &dev->state) && dev_is_sata(dev))
>>>> + sas_ata_device_link_abort(dev, false);
>>>
>>> Firstly, I think that there is a bug in sas_ata_device_link_abort() ->
>>> ata_link_abort() code in that the host lock in not grabbed, as the
>>> comment in ata_port_abort() mentions. Having said that, libsas had
>>> already some dodgy host locking usage - specifically dropping the lock
>>> for the queuing path (that's something else to be fixed up ... I think
>>
>> Taking big locks in queuing path is not a good idea. This will bring
>> down performance.
>
> But it is expected that ata_qc_issue() should be called with that the
> host lock grabbed (and keep it).
>
> I think that the reason libsas drops the lock is because some LLDD
> queuecommand CBs calls task_done() in some error paths. If we kept the
> lock held, then we could have a deadlock, for example:
>
> sas_ata_qc_issue (has lock) -> lldd_execute_task() =
> pm8001_queue_command() -> task_done() = sas_ata_task_done() -> grab host
> lock => deadlock.
That should be easily solvable using a workqueue for doing task_done(), no ?
>
> Thanks,
> John
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-19 23:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20221216100327.7386-1-yangxingui@huawei.com>
2022-12-19 9:23 ` [PATCH V2] scsi: libsas: Directly kick-off EH when ATA device fell off John Garry
2022-12-19 12:59 ` yangxingui
2022-12-19 14:53 ` John Garry
2022-12-20 2:34 ` yangxingui
2022-12-20 9:49 ` Jason Yan
2022-12-21 9:40 ` John Garry
2022-12-21 10:29 ` Jason Yan
2022-12-21 9:28 ` yangxingui
2022-12-19 15:28 ` Jason Yan
2022-12-19 15:55 ` John Garry
2022-12-19 23:00 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2022-12-20 8:43 ` John Garry
2022-12-19 22:59 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-12-20 2:39 ` Jason Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4489f80f-9f39-8f3f-5d10-6b113131e65c@opensource.wdc.com \
--to=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=kangfenglong@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=prime.zeng@hisilicon.com \
--cc=yanaijie@huawei.com \
--cc=yangxingui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox