From: Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Xingui Yang <yangxingui@huawei.com>, <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
<martin.petersen@oracle.com>, <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>,
<linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>, <hare@suse.com>, <hch@lst.de>
Cc: <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linuxarm@huawei.com>, <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>,
<kangfenglong@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] scsi: libsas: Directly kick-off EH when ATA device fell off
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:28:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <60ace19e-d029-f14d-9aac-d5cef83b5b64@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <565fcf28-ec53-8d74-00a3-94be8e5b60e4@oracle.com>
On 2022/12/19 17:23, John Garry wrote:
> On 16/12/2022 10:03, Xingui Yang wrote:
>> If the ATA device fell off, call sas_ata_device_link_abort() directly and
>> mark all outstanding QCs as failed and kick-off EH Immediately. This
>> avoids
>> having to wait for block layer timeouts.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xingui Yang <yangxingui@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> Changes to v1:
>> - Use dev_is_sata() to check ATA device type
>> drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c
>> b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c
>> index d5bc1314c341..a12b65eb4a2a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_discover.c
>> @@ -362,6 +362,9 @@ static void sas_destruct_ports(struct asd_sas_port
>> *port)
>> void sas_unregister_dev(struct asd_sas_port *port, struct
>> domain_device *dev)
>> {
>> + if (test_bit(SAS_DEV_GONE, &dev->state) && dev_is_sata(dev))
>> + sas_ata_device_link_abort(dev, false);
>
> Firstly, I think that there is a bug in sas_ata_device_link_abort() ->
> ata_link_abort() code in that the host lock in not grabbed, as the
> comment in ata_port_abort() mentions. Having said that, libsas had
> already some dodgy host locking usage - specifically dropping the lock
> for the queuing path (that's something else to be fixed up ... I think
Taking big locks in queuing path is not a good idea. This will bring
down performance.
> that is due to queue command CB calling task_done() in some cases), but
> I still think that sas_ata_device_link_abort() should be fixed (to grab
> the host lock).
For sas_ata_device_link_abort(), it should grab ap->lock.
Thanks,
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-19 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20221216100327.7386-1-yangxingui@huawei.com>
2022-12-19 9:23 ` [PATCH V2] scsi: libsas: Directly kick-off EH when ATA device fell off John Garry
2022-12-19 12:59 ` yangxingui
2022-12-19 14:53 ` John Garry
2022-12-20 2:34 ` yangxingui
2022-12-20 9:49 ` Jason Yan
2022-12-21 9:40 ` John Garry
2022-12-21 10:29 ` Jason Yan
2022-12-21 9:28 ` yangxingui
2022-12-19 15:28 ` Jason Yan [this message]
2022-12-19 15:55 ` John Garry
2022-12-19 23:00 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-12-20 8:43 ` John Garry
2022-12-19 22:59 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-12-20 2:39 ` Jason Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=60ace19e-d029-f14d-9aac-d5cef83b5b64@huawei.com \
--to=yanaijie@huawei.com \
--cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=kangfenglong@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=prime.zeng@hisilicon.com \
--cc=yangxingui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox