From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>
To: "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: support for drives larger than 2TiB
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 18:08:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C4B7255.2070505@hardwarefreak.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <92061.1279979348@localhost>
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu put forth on 7/24/2010 8:49 AM:
> As a side consideration - moving from 512 to 4K moves the associated limit from
> 2 TiB to 16 TiB. Given the current rate of device density increase, how much
> time will that buy us, and what do we do then?
The crystal ball tells me that SSD adoption will kick this date a little
farther into the future given that SSD capacity lags mechanical by a large
margin. In the not too distance future, PCs/laptops/netbooks will all
transition to shipping with SSD as their sole/main internal storage device,
with USB3/eSATA thumb drives of 1TB and above permanently replacing external
USB/eSATA mechanical drives.
Servers will probably transition at about the same time to shipping with
solely SSD storage internally for boot/OS and maybe some other primary and a
little secondary storage, with mechanical storage being optional, whether
internal or external. Mechanical in the form of FC/iSCSI SAN and NAS arrays
will still rule large data needs well after the aforementioned transitions above.
--
Stan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-24 23:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-24 9:58 support for drives larger than 2TiB Tejun Heo
2010-07-24 12:21 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-07-24 12:36 ` Alex Buell
2010-07-24 13:49 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-07-24 21:15 ` Alex Buell
2010-07-24 23:08 ` Stan Hoeppner [this message]
2010-07-25 7:56 ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-25 8:05 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2010-07-24 18:40 ` Yuhong Bao
2010-07-24 21:38 ` Greg Freemyer
2010-07-24 23:22 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-07-25 7:49 ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-25 2:25 ` Yuhong Bao
2010-07-25 8:01 ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-25 8:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-07-25 8:20 ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-25 18:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-07-27 8:41 ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-25 8:26 ` Alex Buell
2010-07-25 18:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-07-24 18:48 ` Yuhong Bao
2010-08-19 13:12 ` Mark Lord
2010-08-23 7:40 ` Yuhong Bao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C4B7255.2070505@hardwarefreak.com \
--to=stan@hardwarefreak.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox