Linux ATA/IDE development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com>
Cc: "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: support for drives larger than 2TiB
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 09:56:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C4BEE19.8030106@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C4B7255.2070505@hardwarefreak.com>

Hello,

On 07/25/2010 01:08 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu put forth on 7/24/2010 8:49 AM:
> 
>> As a side consideration - moving from 512 to 4K moves the associated limit from
>> 2 TiB to 16 TiB.  Given the current rate of device density increase, how much
>> time will that buy us, and what do we do then?

I don't really see it happening on ATA hard drives.  Maybe on USB /
external ones.  There simply are too many compatibility implications.

> In the not too distance future, PCs/laptops/netbooks will all
> transition to shipping with SSD as their sole/main internal storage
> device, with USB3/eSATA thumb drives of 1TB and above permanently
> replacing external USB/eSATA mechanical drives.

After hearing the same story for the good part of the decade, I'm a
bit skeptical about this too.  The unit capacity price ratio hasn't
really changed that much.  Maybe requirements for storage capacity
have reached / are approaching saturation point, so as long as the
price keeps coming down, SSDs can be mainstream without closing the
unit capacity price difference.  At this point, hybrid seems much more
realistic to me, but then again, maybe we really are reaching the
saturation point.  Who knows?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-25  7:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-24  9:58 support for drives larger than 2TiB Tejun Heo
2010-07-24 12:21 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-07-24 12:36 ` Alex Buell
2010-07-24 13:49   ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-07-24 21:15     ` Alex Buell
2010-07-24 23:08     ` Stan Hoeppner
2010-07-25  7:56       ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-07-25  8:05         ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2010-07-24 18:40 ` Yuhong Bao
2010-07-24 21:38   ` Greg Freemyer
2010-07-24 23:22     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2010-07-25  7:49       ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-25  2:25     ` Yuhong Bao
2010-07-25  8:01   ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-25  8:07     ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-07-25  8:20       ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-25 18:52         ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-07-27  8:41           ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-25  8:26       ` Alex Buell
2010-07-25 18:53         ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-07-24 18:48 ` Yuhong Bao
2010-08-19 13:12   ` Mark Lord
2010-08-23  7:40     ` Yuhong Bao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C4BEE19.8030106@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stan@hardwarefreak.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox