public inbox for linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Damien LeMoal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] libata: rework sysfs naming
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2022 12:05:41 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <62a7433e-d9f4-a95b-818c-0f1d31160ac8@opensource.wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220324123204.61534-2-hare@suse.de>

On 3/24/22 21:32, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> This patch adds a new dummy bus 'ata', which collects all ata device
> objects like ata_port, ata_link, and ata_dev, and adds an 'ata' prefix
> to the message log.
> To be consistent with the other libata objects the 'ata_port' object name
> has been changed from 'ata' to 'port'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> ---
>   drivers/ata/libata-transport.c | 21 +++++++++++--
>   include/linux/libata.h         | 54 ++++++++++------------------------
>   2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-transport.c b/drivers/ata/libata-transport.c
> index ca129854a88c..555fe6e2293d 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-transport.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-transport.c
> @@ -81,10 +81,13 @@ struct ata_internal {
>   	tdev_to_port((dev)->parent)
>   
>   
> -/* Device objects are always created whit link objects */
> +/* Device objects are always created with link objects */
>   static int ata_tdev_add(struct ata_device *dev);
>   static void ata_tdev_delete(struct ata_device *dev);
>   
> +struct bus_type ata_bus_type = {
> +        .name		= "ata",
> +};
>   
>   /*
>    * Hack to allow attributes of the same name in different objects.
> @@ -288,7 +291,9 @@ int ata_tport_add(struct device *parent,
>   	dev->parent = parent;
>   	ata_host_get(ap->host);
>   	dev->release = ata_tport_release;
> -	dev_set_name(dev, "ata%d", ap->print_id);
> +	dev->bus = &ata_bus_type;
> +	dev_set_name(dev, "port%d", ap->print_id);
> +
>   	transport_setup_device(dev);
>   	ata_acpi_bind_port(ap);
>   	error = device_add(dev);
> @@ -444,6 +449,8 @@ int ata_tlink_add(struct ata_link *link)
>   	device_initialize(dev);
>   	dev->parent = &ap->tdev;
>   	dev->release = ata_tlink_release;
> +	dev->bus = &ata_bus_type;
> +
>   	if (ata_is_host_link(link))
>   		dev_set_name(dev, "link%d", ap->print_id);
>   	else
> @@ -695,8 +702,10 @@ static int ata_tdev_add(struct ata_device *ata_dev)
>   	device_initialize(dev);
>   	dev->parent = &link->tdev;
>   	dev->release = ata_tdev_release;
> +	dev->bus = &ata_bus_type;
> +
>   	if (ata_is_host_link(link))
> -		dev_set_name(dev, "dev%d.%d", ap->print_id,ata_dev->devno);
> +		dev_set_name(dev, "dev%d.%d", ap->print_id, ata_dev->devno);
>   	else
>   		dev_set_name(dev, "dev%d.%d.0", ap->print_id, link->pmp);
>   
> @@ -822,8 +831,13 @@ __init int libata_transport_init(void)
>   	error = transport_class_register(&ata_dev_class);
>   	if (error)
>   		goto out_unregister_port;
> +	error = bus_register(&ata_bus_type);
> +	if (error)
> +		goto out_unregister_bus;

Why is it needed to call bus_unregister() if bus_register() fails ? 
Shouldn't this be a "goto out_unregister_dev" which does a 
"transport_class_unregister(&ata_dev_class)" ?

>   	return 0;
>   
> + out_unregister_bus:
> +	bus_unregister(&ata_bus_type);
>    out_unregister_port:
>   	transport_class_unregister(&ata_port_class);
>    out_unregister_link:
> @@ -835,6 +849,7 @@ __init int libata_transport_init(void)
>   
>   void __exit libata_transport_exit(void)
>   {
> +	bus_unregister(&ata_bus_type);
>   	transport_class_unregister(&ata_link_class);
>   	transport_class_unregister(&ata_port_class);
>   	transport_class_unregister(&ata_dev_class);
> diff --git a/include/linux/libata.h b/include/linux/libata.h
> index 0619ae462ecd..b17683b00c90 100644
> --- a/include/linux/libata.h
> +++ b/include/linux/libata.h
> @@ -835,6 +835,7 @@ struct ata_port {
>   	struct ata_host		*host;
>   	struct device 		*dev;
>   	struct device		tdev;
> +	struct device		cdev;

This one is not used...

>   
>   	struct mutex		scsi_scan_mutex;
>   	struct delayed_work	hotplug_task;
> @@ -1458,61 +1459,38 @@ static inline int sata_srst_pmp(struct ata_link *link)
>   	return link->pmp;
>   }
>   
> -#define ata_port_printk(level, ap, fmt, ...)			\
> -	pr_ ## level ("ata%u: " fmt, (ap)->print_id, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> -
>   #define ata_port_err(ap, fmt, ...)				\
> -	ata_port_printk(err, ap, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> +	dev_err(&ap->tdev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
>   #define ata_port_warn(ap, fmt, ...)				\
> -	ata_port_printk(warn, ap, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> +	dev_warn(&ap->tdev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
>   #define ata_port_notice(ap, fmt, ...)				\
> -	ata_port_printk(notice, ap, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> +	dev_notice(&ap->tdev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
>   #define ata_port_info(ap, fmt, ...)				\
> -	ata_port_printk(info, ap, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> +	dev_info(&ap->tdev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
>   #define ata_port_dbg(ap, fmt, ...)				\
> -	ata_port_printk(debug, ap, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> -
> -#define ata_link_printk(level, link, fmt, ...)			\
> -do {								\
> -	if (sata_pmp_attached((link)->ap) ||			\
> -	    (link)->ap->slave_link)				\
> -		pr_ ## level ("ata%u.%02u: " fmt,		\
> -			      (link)->ap->print_id,		\
> -			      (link)->pmp,			\
> -			      ##__VA_ARGS__);			\
> -        else							\
> -		pr_ ## level ("ata%u: " fmt,			\
> -			      (link)->ap->print_id,		\
> -			      ##__VA_ARGS__);			\
> -} while (0)
> +	dev_dbg(&ap->tdev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
>   
>   #define ata_link_err(link, fmt, ...)				\
> -	ata_link_printk(err, link, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> +	dev_err(&link->tdev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
>   #define ata_link_warn(link, fmt, ...)				\
> -	ata_link_printk(warn, link, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> +	dev_warn(&link->tdev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
>   #define ata_link_notice(link, fmt, ...)				\
> -	ata_link_printk(notice, link, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> +	dev_notice(&link->tdev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
>   #define ata_link_info(link, fmt, ...)				\
> -	ata_link_printk(info, link, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> +	dev_info(&link->tdev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
>   #define ata_link_dbg(link, fmt, ...)				\
> -	ata_link_printk(debug, link, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> -
> -#define ata_dev_printk(level, dev, fmt, ...)			\
> -        pr_ ## level("ata%u.%02u: " fmt,			\
> -               (dev)->link->ap->print_id,			\
> -	       (dev)->link->pmp + (dev)->devno,			\
> -	       ##__VA_ARGS__)
> +	dev_dbg(&link->tdev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
>   
>   #define ata_dev_err(dev, fmt, ...)				\
> -	ata_dev_printk(err, dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> +	dev_err(&dev->tdev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
>   #define ata_dev_warn(dev, fmt, ...)				\
> -	ata_dev_printk(warn, dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> +	dev_warn(&dev->tdev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
>   #define ata_dev_notice(dev, fmt, ...)				\
> -	ata_dev_printk(notice, dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> +	dev_notice(&dev->tdev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
>   #define ata_dev_info(dev, fmt, ...)				\
> -	ata_dev_printk(info, dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> +	dev_info(&dev->tdev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
>   #define ata_dev_dbg(dev, fmt, ...)				\
> -	ata_dev_printk(debug, dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> +	dev_dbg(&dev->tdev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
>   
>   void ata_print_version(const struct device *dev, const char *version);
>   


-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-25  3:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-24 12:32 [PATCHv3 0/2] libata: sysfs naming Hannes Reinecke
2022-03-24 12:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] libata: rework " Hannes Reinecke
2022-03-25  3:05   ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2022-03-25  7:10     ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-03-24 12:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] libata: CONFIG_ATA_SYSFS_COMPAT Hannes Reinecke
2022-03-25  3:01   ` Damien Le Moal
2022-03-25  7:12     ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-03-25  7:16       ` Damien Le Moal
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-03-25 12:56 [PATCHv4 0/2] libata: sysfs naming Hannes Reinecke
2022-03-25 12:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] libata: rework " Hannes Reinecke
2022-03-26 18:12   ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=62a7433e-d9f4-a95b-818c-0f1d31160ac8@opensource.wdc.com \
    --to=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
    --cc=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox