public inbox for linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: RunaGuo-oc <RunaGuo-oc@zhaoxin.com>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>,
	<linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Cobe Chen <CobeChen@zhaoxin.com>, Tim Guo <TimGuo@zhaoxin.com>,
	TonyW Wang <TonyWWang@zhaoxin.com>, Leo Liu <LeoLiu@zhaoxin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ahci: Add PxSCTL.IPM control on actual LPM capability
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 17:58:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <74749fd5-82ae-ab40-69e8-bd93503cdafa@zhaoxin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2a91c02d-4f7c-535b-e047-889df87ebebd@opensource.wdc.com>

On 2022/4/21 18:53, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 4/21/22 18:43, Runa Guo-oc wrote:
>> On some platform, when OS enables LPM by default (eg, min_power),
>> then, DIPM slumber request cannot be disallowed if ahci's CAP.PSC
>> is set to '1' and CAP.SSC is cleared to '0', which may cause ahci
>> to be an uncertain state (same for Partial).
>>
>> In ahci spec, when CAP.PSC/SSC is cleared to '0', the PxSCTL.IPM
>> field must be programmed to disallow device initiated Partial/
>> Slumber request.
>>
>> Adds support to control this case on actual LPM capability.
> s/Adds/Add

Sorry, here should use 'Add' instead of 'Adds'.

> Overall, I need to reread the specs to confirm all this.

Ok.

>> Signed-off-by: Runa Guo-oc <RunaGuo-oc@zhaoxin.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/ata/libata-sata.c | 12 +++++++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-sata.c b/drivers/ata/libata-sata.c
>> index 7a5fe41..e6195cf 100644
>> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-sata.c
>> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-sata.c
>> @@ -394,9 +394,19 @@ int sata_link_scr_lpm(struct ata_link *link, enum ata_lpm_policy policy,
>>   	case ATA_LPM_MED_POWER_WITH_DIPM:
>>   	case ATA_LPM_MIN_POWER_WITH_PARTIAL:
>>   	case ATA_LPM_MIN_POWER:
>> -		if (ata_link_nr_enabled(link) > 0)
>> +		if (ata_link_nr_enabled(link) > 0) {
>>   			/* no restrictions on LPM transitions */>  			scontrol &= ~(0x7 << 8);
> Given that the added code below adds restrictions, this comment is
> strange. Better change it to something like:
>
> 			/* Assume no restrictions on LPM transitions */
>
>> +
>> +			/* if controller does not support partial, then disallows it,
>> +			 * the same for slumber
>> +			 */
> Please correctly format the comment and check the grammar. Some like below
> is easier to read.
>
> 			/*
> 			 * If the controller does not support partial or
> 			 * slumber then disallow these transitions.
> 			 */
>
>> +			if (!(link->ap->host->flags & ATA_HOST_PART))
>> +				scontrol |= (0x1 << 8);
>> +
>> +			if (!(link->ap->host->flags & ATA_HOST_SSC))
>> +				scontrol |= (0x2 << 8);
>> +		}
>>   		else {
> Please do not leave this else here. Put it on the same line as the closing
> bracket and enclose the below statements in brackets too.
>
>>   			/* empty port, power off */
>>   			scontrol &= ~0xf;
> 		} else {
> 			/* empty port, power off */
>   			scontrol &= ~0xf;
> 		}

  
I'll change it like below,
+		if (ata_link_nr_enabled(link) > 0) {
-			/* no restrictions on LPM transitions */
+			/* Assume no restrictions on LPM transitions */
			scontrol &= ~(0x7 << 8);
  
+			/*
+			 * If the controller does not support partial or
+			 * slumber then disallow these transitions.
+			 */

+			if (!(link->ap->host->flags & ATA_HOST_PART))
+				scontrol |= (0x1 << 8);
+
+			if (!(link->ap->host->flags & ATA_HOST_SSC))
+				scontrol |= (0x2 << 8);

		} else {
			/* empty port, power off */
  			scontrol &= ~0xf;
		}


      reply	other threads:[~2022-04-22  9:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-21  9:43 [PATCH 0/2] ahci: Add some controls on actual LPM capability Runa Guo-oc
2022-04-21  9:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] ahci: Add PhyRdy Change control " Runa Guo-oc
2022-04-21 10:39   ` Damien Le Moal
2022-04-22  9:57     ` RunaGuo-oc
2022-04-22 22:37       ` Damien Le Moal
2022-04-27 10:18         ` Runa Guo-oc
2022-05-02 13:05           ` Damien Le Moal
2022-05-07  7:36             ` Runa Guo-oc
2022-05-11  8:14               ` Damien Le Moal
2022-05-18 21:31                 ` Limonciello, Mario
2022-04-21  9:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] ahci: Add PxSCTL.IPM " Runa Guo-oc
2022-04-21 10:53   ` Damien Le Moal
2022-04-22  9:58     ` RunaGuo-oc [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=74749fd5-82ae-ab40-69e8-bd93503cdafa@zhaoxin.com \
    --to=runaguo-oc@zhaoxin.com \
    --cc=CobeChen@zhaoxin.com \
    --cc=LeoLiu@zhaoxin.com \
    --cc=TimGuo@zhaoxin.com \
    --cc=TonyWWang@zhaoxin.com \
    --cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox