From: Tero Roponen <tero.roponen@gmail.com>
To: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
Subject: libata: init ata_print_id to 0
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 11:38:00 +0300 (EEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1204221136450.1947@terrop> (raw)
When comparing the dmesg between 3.4-rc3 and 3.4-rc4 I found the
following differences:
-ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m2048@0xf9fff000 port 0xf9fff100 irq 47
-ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m2048@0xf9fff000 port 0xf9fff180 irq 47
-ata3: DUMMY
+ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m2048@0xf9fff000 port 0xf9fff100 irq 47
+ata3: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m2048@0xf9fff000 port 0xf9fff180 irq 47
ata4: DUMMY
ata5: DUMMY
-ata6: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m2048@0xf9fff000 port 0xf9fff380 irq 47
+ata6: DUMMY
+ata7: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m2048@0xf9fff000 port 0xf9fff380 irq 47
The change of numbering comes from commit 85d6725b7c0d7e3f ("libata:
make ata_print_id atomic") that changed lines like
ap->print_id = ata_print_id++;
to
ap->print_id = atomic_inc_return(&ata_print_id);
As the latter behaves like ++ata_print_id, we must initialize
it to zero to start the numbering from one.
Signed-off-by: Tero Roponen <tero.roponen@gmail.com>
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
index 28db50b..23763a1 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static unsigned int ata_dev_set_xfermode(struct ata_device *dev);
static void ata_dev_xfermask(struct ata_device *dev);
static unsigned long ata_dev_blacklisted(const struct ata_device *dev);
-atomic_t ata_print_id = ATOMIC_INIT(1);
+atomic_t ata_print_id = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
struct ata_force_param {
const char *name;
next reply other threads:[~2012-04-22 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-22 8:38 Tero Roponen [this message]
2012-04-22 14:57 ` libata: init ata_print_id to 0 Dan Williams
2012-04-23 15:32 ` Mark Lord
2012-04-23 16:34 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1204221136450.1947@terrop \
--to=tero.roponen@gmail.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=jgarzik@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox