Re: [PATCH v10 3/5] iio: proximity: Add SX9324 support

[Jonathan Cameron <jic23@jic23.retrosnub.co.uk>]

On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 14:19:44 +0200
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 2, 2022 at 6:28 PM Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > Semtech SAR sensor SX9324 is an evolution of the SX9310:
> > It has 4 phases that can be configure to capture and process data
> > from any of 3 CS pins and provide independent detection:
> > proximity, table proximity or body proximity.
> >
> > Gather antenna data:
> >   echo sx9324-dev3 > trigger/current_trigger
> >   echo 1 > scan_elements/in_proximity0_en
> >   echo 1 > buffer/enable
> >   od -v -An --endian=big -t d2 -w2 /dev/iio\:device3
> >   (at 10Hz, the default).
> >
> > Trigger events:
> > Setting:
> >   thresh_falling_period: 2 (events)
> >   thresh_rising_period: 2 (events)
> >   in_proximity0_thresh_either_value: 300
> >   in_proximity0_thresh_either_hysteresis: 72
> >
> > using iio_event_monitor /dev/iio\:deviceX, approaching my hand to the
> > antenna pad, I see:
> > ...
> > Event: time: 1634763907532035297, type: proximity, channel: 0, evtype:
> > thresh, direction: falling
> > Event: time: 1634763910138104640, type: proximity, channel: 0, evtype:
> > thresh, direction: rising
> > ...
> >
> > Datasheet:
> > https://edit.wpgdadawant.com/uploads/news_file/program/2019/30184/tech_files/program_30184_suggest_other_file.pdf  
> 
> Jonathan, I noticed you have applied this to testing, can you please
> make Datasheet a real tag?
> I.o.w. put it to one line and drop the following blank line.
> 
Sure.  Can roll other fixes in as well until rc1 shows up and I rebase the tree.

I tidied up the other patch naming in here to make it more consistent whilst
I was there.

New tree pushed out.
Thanks,

Jonathan