* [PATCH v2] iio:proximity:sx9324: Fix hardware gain read/write
@ 2022-03-24 22:29 Stephen Boyd
2022-03-26 15:45 ` Gwendal Grignou
2022-03-27 14:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Boyd @ 2022-03-24 22:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Cameron, Lars-Peter Clausen
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-iio, Gwendal Grignou
There are four possible gain values according to 'sx9324_gain_vals[]':
1, 2, 4, and 8
The values are off by one when writing and reading the register. The
bits should be set according to this equation:
ilog2(<gain>) + 1
so that a gain of 8 is 0x3 in the register field and a gain of 4 is 0x2
in the register field, etc. Note that a gain of 0 is reserved per the
datasheet. The default gain (SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_1) is also
wrong. It should be 0x1 << 3, i.e. 0x8, not 0x80 which is setting the
reserved bit 7.
Fix this all up to properly handle the hardware gain and return errors
for invalid settings.
Fixes: 4c18a890dff8 ("iio:proximity:sx9324: Add SX9324 support")
Cc: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
---
Changes from v1 (https://lore.kernel.org/r/)20220318204808.3404542-1-swboyd@chromium.org:
* Reject invalid settings
* Fix default value
* More commit text details
drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c b/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c
index 0d9bbbb50cb4..6e90917e3e36 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c
@@ -76,7 +76,10 @@
#define SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0 0x30
#define SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_MASK GENMASK(5, 3)
-#define SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_1 0x80
+#define SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_SHIFT 3
+#define SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_RSVD 0x0
+#define SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_1 0x1
+#define SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_8 0x4
#define SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_RAWFILT_MASK GENMASK(2, 0)
#define SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_RAWFILT_1P50 0x01
#define SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL1 0x31
@@ -379,7 +382,14 @@ static int sx9324_read_gain(struct sx_common_data *data,
if (ret)
return ret;
- *val = 1 << FIELD_GET(SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_MASK, regval);
+ regval = FIELD_GET(SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_MASK, regval);
+ if (regval)
+ regval--;
+ else if (regval == SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_RSVD ||
+ regval > SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_8)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ *val = 1 << regval;
return IIO_VAL_INT;
}
@@ -725,8 +735,12 @@ static int sx9324_write_gain(struct sx_common_data *data,
unsigned int gain, reg;
int ret;
- gain = ilog2(val);
reg = SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0 + chan->channel / 2;
+
+ gain = ilog2(val) + 1;
+ if (val <= 0 || gain > SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_8)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
gain = FIELD_PREP(SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_MASK, gain);
mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
@@ -784,9 +798,11 @@ static const struct sx_common_reg_default sx9324_default_regs[] = {
{ SX9324_REG_AFE_CTRL8, SX9324_REG_AFE_CTRL8_RESFILTN_4KOHM },
{ SX9324_REG_AFE_CTRL9, SX9324_REG_AFE_CTRL9_AGAIN_1 },
- { SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0, SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_1 |
+ { SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0,
+ SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_1 << SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_SHIFT |
SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_RAWFILT_1P50 },
- { SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL1, SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_1 |
+ { SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL1,
+ SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_1 << SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_SHIFT |
SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_RAWFILT_1P50 },
{ SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL2, SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL2_AVGNEG_THRESH_16K },
{ SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL3, SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL3_AVGDEB_2SAMPLES |
base-commit: a8ee3b32f5da6c77a5ccc0e42c2250d61ba54fe0
--
https://chromeos.dev
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] iio:proximity:sx9324: Fix hardware gain read/write
2022-03-24 22:29 [PATCH v2] iio:proximity:sx9324: Fix hardware gain read/write Stephen Boyd
@ 2022-03-26 15:45 ` Gwendal Grignou
2022-03-27 14:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Gwendal Grignou @ 2022-03-26 15:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Boyd
Cc: Jonathan Cameron, Lars-Peter Clausen, linux-kernel, linux-iio
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 3:29 PM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> There are four possible gain values according to 'sx9324_gain_vals[]':
>
> 1, 2, 4, and 8
>
> The values are off by one when writing and reading the register. The
> bits should be set according to this equation:
>
> ilog2(<gain>) + 1
>
> so that a gain of 8 is 0x3 in the register field and a gain of 4 is 0x2
> in the register field, etc. Note that a gain of 0 is reserved per the
> datasheet. The default gain (SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_1) is also
> wrong. It should be 0x1 << 3, i.e. 0x8, not 0x80 which is setting the
> reserved bit 7.
>
> Fix this all up to properly handle the hardware gain and return errors
> for invalid settings.
>
> Fixes: 4c18a890dff8 ("iio:proximity:sx9324: Add SX9324 support")
> Cc: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
> ---
>
> Changes from v1 (https://lore.kernel.org/r/)20220318204808.3404542-1-swboyd@chromium.org:
> * Reject invalid settings
> * Fix default value
> * More commit text details
>
> drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c b/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c
> index 0d9bbbb50cb4..6e90917e3e36 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c
> @@ -76,7 +76,10 @@
>
> #define SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0 0x30
> #define SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_MASK GENMASK(5, 3)
> -#define SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_1 0x80
> +#define SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_SHIFT 3
> +#define SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_RSVD 0x0
> +#define SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_1 0x1
> +#define SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_8 0x4
> #define SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_RAWFILT_MASK GENMASK(2, 0)
> #define SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_RAWFILT_1P50 0x01
> #define SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL1 0x31
> @@ -379,7 +382,14 @@ static int sx9324_read_gain(struct sx_common_data *data,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - *val = 1 << FIELD_GET(SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_MASK, regval);
> + regval = FIELD_GET(SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_MASK, regval);
> + if (regval)
> + regval--;
> + else if (regval == SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_RSVD ||
> + regval > SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_8)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + *val = 1 << regval;
>
> return IIO_VAL_INT;
> }
> @@ -725,8 +735,12 @@ static int sx9324_write_gain(struct sx_common_data *data,
> unsigned int gain, reg;
> int ret;
>
> - gain = ilog2(val);
> reg = SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0 + chan->channel / 2;
> +
> + gain = ilog2(val) + 1;
> + if (val <= 0 || gain > SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_8)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> gain = FIELD_PREP(SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_MASK, gain);
>
> mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
> @@ -784,9 +798,11 @@ static const struct sx_common_reg_default sx9324_default_regs[] = {
> { SX9324_REG_AFE_CTRL8, SX9324_REG_AFE_CTRL8_RESFILTN_4KOHM },
> { SX9324_REG_AFE_CTRL9, SX9324_REG_AFE_CTRL9_AGAIN_1 },
>
> - { SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0, SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_1 |
> + { SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0,
> + SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_1 << SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_SHIFT |
> SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_RAWFILT_1P50 },
> - { SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL1, SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_1 |
> + { SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL1,
> + SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_1 << SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_SHIFT |
> SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_RAWFILT_1P50 },
> { SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL2, SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL2_AVGNEG_THRESH_16K },
> { SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL3, SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL3_AVGDEB_2SAMPLES |
>
> base-commit: a8ee3b32f5da6c77a5ccc0e42c2250d61ba54fe0
> --
> https://chromeos.dev
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] iio:proximity:sx9324: Fix hardware gain read/write
2022-03-24 22:29 [PATCH v2] iio:proximity:sx9324: Fix hardware gain read/write Stephen Boyd
2022-03-26 15:45 ` Gwendal Grignou
@ 2022-03-27 14:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-29 20:25 ` Stephen Boyd
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2022-03-27 14:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Boyd; +Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen, linux-kernel, linux-iio, Gwendal Grignou
On Thu, 24 Mar 2022 15:29:28 -0700
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> wrote:
> There are four possible gain values according to 'sx9324_gain_vals[]':
>
> 1, 2, 4, and 8
>
> The values are off by one when writing and reading the register. The
> bits should be set according to this equation:
>
> ilog2(<gain>) + 1
>
> so that a gain of 8 is 0x3 in the register field and a gain of 4 is 0x2
> in the register field, etc
Example seems wrong...
ilog2(8) + 1 = 3 + 1 = 0x4
ilog2(4) + 1 = 2 + 1 = 0x3
ilog2(2) + 1 = 1 + 1 = 0x2
ilog2(1) + 1 = 0 + 1 = 0x1
0x0 reserved.
or have I misunderstood?
>. Note that a gain of 0 is reserved per the
> datasheet. The default gain (SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_1) is also
> wrong. It should be 0x1 << 3, i.e. 0x8, not 0x80 which is setting the
> reserved bit 7.
>
> Fix this all up to properly handle the hardware gain and return errors
> for invalid settings.
>
> Fixes: 4c18a890dff8 ("iio:proximity:sx9324: Add SX9324 support")
> Cc: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
> ---
>
> Changes from v1 (https://lore.kernel.org/r/)20220318204808.3404542-1-swboyd@chromium.org:
> * Reject invalid settings
> * Fix default value
> * More commit text details
>
> drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c b/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c
> index 0d9bbbb50cb4..6e90917e3e36 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c
> @@ -76,7 +76,10 @@
>
> #define SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0 0x30
> #define SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_MASK GENMASK(5, 3)
> -#define SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_1 0x80
> +#define SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_SHIFT 3
> +#define SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_RSVD 0x0
> +#define SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_1 0x1
> +#define SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_8 0x4
> #define SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_RAWFILT_MASK GENMASK(2, 0)
> #define SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_RAWFILT_1P50 0x01
> #define SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL1 0x31
> @@ -379,7 +382,14 @@ static int sx9324_read_gain(struct sx_common_data *data,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - *val = 1 << FIELD_GET(SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_MASK, regval);
> + regval = FIELD_GET(SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_MASK, regval);
> + if (regval)
> + regval--;
> + else if (regval == SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_RSVD ||
> + regval > SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_8)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + *val = 1 << regval;
>
> return IIO_VAL_INT;
> }
> @@ -725,8 +735,12 @@ static int sx9324_write_gain(struct sx_common_data *data,
> unsigned int gain, reg;
> int ret;
>
> - gain = ilog2(val);
> reg = SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0 + chan->channel / 2;
> +
> + gain = ilog2(val) + 1;
> + if (val <= 0 || gain > SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_8)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> gain = FIELD_PREP(SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_MASK, gain);
>
> mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
> @@ -784,9 +798,11 @@ static const struct sx_common_reg_default sx9324_default_regs[] = {
> { SX9324_REG_AFE_CTRL8, SX9324_REG_AFE_CTRL8_RESFILTN_4KOHM },
> { SX9324_REG_AFE_CTRL9, SX9324_REG_AFE_CTRL9_AGAIN_1 },
>
> - { SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0, SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_1 |
> + { SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0,
> + SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_1 << SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_SHIFT |
> SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_RAWFILT_1P50 },
> - { SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL1, SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_1 |
> + { SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL1,
> + SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_1 << SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_GAIN_SHIFT |
> SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0_RAWFILT_1P50 },
> { SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL2, SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL2_AVGNEG_THRESH_16K },
> { SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL3, SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL3_AVGDEB_2SAMPLES |
>
> base-commit: a8ee3b32f5da6c77a5ccc0e42c2250d61ba54fe0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] iio:proximity:sx9324: Fix hardware gain read/write
2022-03-27 14:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
@ 2022-03-29 20:25 ` Stephen Boyd
2022-04-02 16:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Boyd @ 2022-03-29 20:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Cameron
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen, linux-kernel, linux-iio, Gwendal Grignou
Quoting Jonathan Cameron (2022-03-27 07:51:47)
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2022 15:29:28 -0700
> Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> > There are four possible gain values according to 'sx9324_gain_vals[]':
> >
> > 1, 2, 4, and 8
> >
> > The values are off by one when writing and reading the register. The
> > bits should be set according to this equation:
> >
> > ilog2(<gain>) + 1
> >
> > so that a gain of 8 is 0x3 in the register field and a gain of 4 is 0x2
> > in the register field, etc
>
> Example seems wrong...
>
> ilog2(8) + 1 = 3 + 1 = 0x4
> ilog2(4) + 1 = 2 + 1 = 0x3
> ilog2(2) + 1 = 1 + 1 = 0x2
> ilog2(1) + 1 = 0 + 1 = 0x1
> 0x0 reserved.
>
> or have I misunderstood?
Nope. I hit the wrong key but your table is correct. Can you fix it when
applying?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] iio:proximity:sx9324: Fix hardware gain read/write
2022-03-29 20:25 ` Stephen Boyd
@ 2022-04-02 16:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-04-04 20:35 ` Stephen Boyd
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2022-04-02 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Boyd; +Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen, linux-kernel, linux-iio, Gwendal Grignou
On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 22:25:31 +0200
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> wrote:
> Quoting Jonathan Cameron (2022-03-27 07:51:47)
> > On Thu, 24 Mar 2022 15:29:28 -0700
> > Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > > There are four possible gain values according to 'sx9324_gain_vals[]':
> > >
> > > 1, 2, 4, and 8
> > >
> > > The values are off by one when writing and reading the register. The
> > > bits should be set according to this equation:
> > >
> > > ilog2(<gain>) + 1
> > >
> > > so that a gain of 8 is 0x3 in the register field and a gain of 4 is 0x2
> > > in the register field, etc
> >
> > Example seems wrong...
> >
> > ilog2(8) + 1 = 3 + 1 = 0x4
> > ilog2(4) + 1 = 2 + 1 = 0x3
> > ilog2(2) + 1 = 1 + 1 = 0x2
> > ilog2(1) + 1 = 0 + 1 = 0x1
> > 0x0 reserved.
> >
> > or have I misunderstood?
>
> Nope. I hit the wrong key but your table is correct. Can you fix it when
> applying?
Done and applied to the fixes-togreg branch of iio.git but I haven't pushed
it out yet as I want to rebase that tree on rc1 when it comes out.
After that, please take a quick look check I didn't mess up.
Thanks,
Jonathan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] iio:proximity:sx9324: Fix hardware gain read/write
2022-04-02 16:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
@ 2022-04-04 20:35 ` Stephen Boyd
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Boyd @ 2022-04-04 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Cameron
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen, linux-kernel, linux-iio, Gwendal Grignou
Quoting Jonathan Cameron (2022-04-02 09:51:31)
> On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 22:25:31 +0200
> Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> > Quoting Jonathan Cameron (2022-03-27 07:51:47)
> > > On Thu, 24 Mar 2022 15:29:28 -0700
> > > Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > There are four possible gain values according to 'sx9324_gain_vals[]':
> > > >
> > > > 1, 2, 4, and 8
> > > >
> > > > The values are off by one when writing and reading the register. The
> > > > bits should be set according to this equation:
> > > >
> > > > ilog2(<gain>) + 1
> > > >
> > > > so that a gain of 8 is 0x3 in the register field and a gain of 4 is 0x2
> > > > in the register field, etc
> > >
> > > Example seems wrong...
> > >
> > > ilog2(8) + 1 = 3 + 1 = 0x4
> > > ilog2(4) + 1 = 2 + 1 = 0x3
> > > ilog2(2) + 1 = 1 + 1 = 0x2
> > > ilog2(1) + 1 = 0 + 1 = 0x1
> > > 0x0 reserved.
> > >
> > > or have I misunderstood?
> >
> > Nope. I hit the wrong key but your table is correct. Can you fix it when
> > applying?
>
> Done and applied to the fixes-togreg branch of iio.git but I haven't pushed
> it out yet as I want to rebase that tree on rc1 when it comes out.
>
> After that, please take a quick look check I didn't mess up.
>
Thanks. Looks good.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-04-04 21:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-03-24 22:29 [PATCH v2] iio:proximity:sx9324: Fix hardware gain read/write Stephen Boyd
2022-03-26 15:45 ` Gwendal Grignou
2022-03-27 14:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-03-29 20:25 ` Stephen Boyd
2022-04-02 16:51 ` Jonathan Cameron
2022-04-04 20:35 ` Stephen Boyd
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox