From: "Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>
To: <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] iio: buffer: make sure O_NONBLOCK is respected
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 11:14:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230216101452.591805-3-nuno.sa@analog.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230216101452.591805-1-nuno.sa@analog.com>
For output buffers, there's no guarantee that the buffer won't be full
in the first iteration of the loop in which case we would block
independently of userspace passing O_NONBLOCK or not. Fix it by always
checking the flag before going to sleep.
While at it (and as it's a bit related), refactored the loop so that the
stop condition is 'written != n', i.e, run the loop until all data has
been copied into the IIO buffers. This makes the code a bit simpler.
Fixes: 9eeee3b0bf190 ("iio: Add output buffer support")
Signed-off-by: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@analog.com>
---
drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
index c56cf748fde1..7e7ee307a3f7 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
@@ -203,21 +203,24 @@ static ssize_t iio_buffer_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *buf,
break;
}
+ if (filp->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) {
+ if (!written)
+ ret = -EAGAIN;
+ break;
+ }
+
wait_woken(&wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE,
MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
continue;
}
ret = rb->access->write(rb, n - written, buf + written);
- if (ret == 0 && (filp->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK))
- ret = -EAGAIN;
+ if (ret < 0)
+ break;
- if (ret > 0) {
- written += ret;
- if (written != n && !(filp->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK))
- continue;
- }
- } while (ret == 0);
+ written += ret;
+
+ } while (written != n);
remove_wait_queue(&rb->pollq, &wait);
return ret < 0 ? ret : written;
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-16 10:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-16 10:14 [PATCH 0/3] output buffer write fops fixes Nuno Sá
2023-02-16 10:14 ` [PATCH 1/3] iio: buffer: correctly return bytes written in output buffers Nuno Sá
2023-02-16 13:40 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2023-02-18 14:07 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-16 10:14 ` Nuno Sá [this message]
2023-02-16 14:00 ` [PATCH 2/3] iio: buffer: make sure O_NONBLOCK is respected Lars-Peter Clausen
2023-02-18 14:08 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-02-16 10:14 ` [PATCH 3/3] iio: buffer: fix coding style warnings Nuno Sá
2023-02-16 14:07 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2023-02-27 7:39 ` Nuno Sá
2023-03-04 13:03 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-05-01 16:15 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230216101452.591805-3-nuno.sa@analog.com \
--to=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox