From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, "Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Cosmin Tanislav <cosmin.tanislav@analog.com>,
Mihail Chindris <mihail.chindris@analog.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Tomislav Denis <tomislav.denis@avl.com>,
Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>,
Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@foss.st.com>,
Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
Marius Cristea <marius.cristea@microchip.com>,
Ibrahim Tilki <Ibrahim.Tilki@analog.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/9] IIO: Use device_for_each_child_scope()
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 12:32:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240224123215.161469-1-jic23@kernel.org> (raw)
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Previously:
[PATCH v4 00/15] device property / IIO: Use cleanup.h magic for fwnode_handle_put() handling.
The infrastructure being used here is now in iio.git (currently exposed
as testing for initial 0-day testing). I also applied a couple of users
that had received positive reviews. I split the series up like this
so that the infrastructure would make the merge window if reviews on these
take a little longer to come in (hopefully these will also make it)
Some of the driver changes haven't received any tags or specific feedback
yet, so I want to repost those for review. Andy and Nuno gave some
feedback on other patches. Resulting changes called out in specific
patches.
Jonathan Cameron (9):
iio: temp: ltc2983: Use __free(fwnode_handle) and
device_for_each_node_scoped()
iio: adc: mcp3564: Use device_for_each_child_node_scoped()
iio: adc: qcom-spmi-adc5: Use device_for_each_child_node_scoped()
iio: adc: rzg2l_adc: Use device_for_each_child_node_scoped()
iio: adc: stm32: Use device_for_each_child_node_scoped()
iio: adc: ti-ads1015: Use device_for_each_child_node_scoped()
iio: adc: ti-ads131e08: Use device_for_each_child_node_scoped()
iio: dac: ad3552r: Use device_for_each_child_node_scoped()
iio: dac: ad5770r: Use device_for_each_child_node_scoped()
drivers/iio/adc/mcp3564.c | 16 ++--
drivers/iio/adc/qcom-spmi-adc5.c | 7 +-
drivers/iio/adc/rzg2l_adc.c | 11 +--
drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c | 61 ++++++-------
drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1015.c | 5 +-
drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads131e08.c | 13 +--
drivers/iio/dac/ad3552r.c | 51 +++++------
drivers/iio/dac/ad5770r.c | 19 ++---
drivers/iio/temperature/ltc2983.c | 137 +++++++++++-------------------
9 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 204 deletions(-)
--
2.44.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-02-24 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-24 12:32 Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-02-24 12:32 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] iio: temp: ltc2983: Use __free(fwnode_handle) and device_for_each_node_scoped() Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-26 8:35 ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-26 19:30 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-27 8:08 ` Nuno Sá
2024-02-24 12:32 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] iio: adc: mcp3564: Use device_for_each_child_node_scoped() Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-24 12:32 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] iio: adc: qcom-spmi-adc5: " Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-24 12:32 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] iio: adc: rzg2l_adc: " Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-27 9:52 ` Prabhakar Mahadev Lad
2024-02-27 19:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-24 12:32 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] iio: adc: stm32: " Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-29 11:34 ` Fabrice Gasnier
2024-02-24 12:32 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] iio: adc: ti-ads1015: " Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-24 12:32 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] iio: adc: ti-ads131e08: " Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-24 12:32 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] iio: dac: ad3552r: " Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-24 12:32 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] iio: dac: ad5770r: " Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240224123215.161469-1-jic23@kernel.org \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=Ibrahim.Tilki@analog.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=cosmin.tanislav@analog.com \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=fabrice.gasnier@foss.st.com \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=marex@denx.de \
--cc=marijn.suijten@somainline.org \
--cc=marius.cristea@microchip.com \
--cc=mihail.chindris@analog.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=olivier.moysan@foss.st.com \
--cc=prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=tomislav.denis@avl.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox