Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: ad_sigma_delta: Use `unsigned int` instead of plain `unsigned`

[Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>]

On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 12:48:09 +0100
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com> wrote:

> This fixes a checkpatch warning:
> 
> 	WARNING: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
> 	#70: FILE: drivers/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.c:253:
> 	+		unsigned status_reg;
> 
> Fixes: 132d44dc6966 ("iio: adc: ad_sigma_delta: Check for previous ready signals")
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
Applied.  I dropped the fixes tag (which was useful to me to find the patch)
because it's just a warning + I don't want to mess up if I do have to rebase
for some reasons (and all the tags change!)

Thanks,

Jonathan

> ---
> Hello,
> 
> if it's not already to late for that, feel free to squash this into the
> original commit.
> 
> Best regards
> Uwe
> 
>  drivers/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.c
> index c3c81aef34d8..7164ae255ed7 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad_sigma_delta.c
> @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static int ad_sigma_delta_clear_pending_event(struct ad_sigma_delta *sigma_delta
>  	if (sigma_delta->rdy_gpiod) {
>  		pending_event = gpiod_get_value(sigma_delta->rdy_gpiod);
>  	} else {
> -		unsigned status_reg;
> +		unsigned int status_reg;
>  
>  		ret = ad_sd_read_reg(sigma_delta, AD_SD_REG_STATUS, 1, &status_reg);
>  		if (ret)
> 
> base-commit: 132d44dc6966c1cf841ffe0f6f048165687e870b