From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@gmail.com>
Cc: lars@metafoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@analog.com,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
eraretuya@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/14] iio: accel: adxl345: extend sample frequency adjustments
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2025 17:38:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250216173805.3b629a61@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250210110119.260858-10-l.rubusch@gmail.com>
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 11:01:14 +0000
Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@gmail.com> wrote:
> Introduce enums and functions to work with the sample frequency
> adjustments. Let the sample frequency adjust via IIO and configure
> a reasonable default.
>
> Replace the old static sample frequency handling. The patch is in
> preparation for activity/inactivity handling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@gmail.com>
I noticed now that we don't actually have regmap caching enabled.
I think it will make things sufficiently simpler that it is worth
doing even though you have to specify which registers are volatile etc.
> +
> +static int adxl345_set_odr(struct adxl345_state *st, enum adxl345_odr odr)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = regmap_update_bits(st->regmap, ADXL345_REG_BW_RATE,
> + ADXL345_BW_RATE_MSK,
> + FIELD_PREP(ADXL345_BW_RATE_MSK, odr));
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + st->odr = odr;
Why do we need to keep a copy cached? Seems like we can get it from
regmap cache easily enough?
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> @@ -488,7 +572,12 @@ static int adxl345_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> int val, int val2, long mask)
> {
> struct adxl345_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> - s64 n;
> + enum adxl345_odr odr;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = adxl345_set_measure_en(st, false);
Please add some more on why this is now necessary to the patch description.
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>
> switch (mask) {
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBBIAS:
> @@ -496,20 +585,24 @@ static int adxl345_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> * 8-bit resolution at +/- 2g, that is 4x accel data scale
> * factor
> */
> - return regmap_write(st->regmap,
> - ADXL345_REG_OFS_AXIS(chan->address),
> - val / 4);
> + ret = regmap_write(st->regmap,
> + ADXL345_REG_OFS_AXIS(chan->address),
> + val / 4);
> + break;
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
> - n = div_s64(val * NANOHZ_PER_HZ + val2,
> - ADXL345_BASE_RATE_NANO_HZ);
> -
> - return regmap_update_bits(st->regmap, ADXL345_REG_BW_RATE,
> - ADXL345_BW_RATE,
> - clamp_val(ilog2(n), 0,
> - ADXL345_BW_RATE));
> + ret = adxl345_find_odr(st, val, val2, &odr);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + ret = adxl345_set_odr(st, odr);
> + break;
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - return -EINVAL;
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return adxl345_set_measure_en(st, true);
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-16 17:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-10 11:01 [PATCH v2 00/14] iio: accel: adxl345: add interrupt based sensor events Lothar Rubusch
2025-02-10 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] iio: accel: adxl345: reorganize measurement enable Lothar Rubusch
2025-02-10 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] iio: accel: adxl345: add debug register access Lothar Rubusch
2025-02-10 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] iio: accel: adxl345: reorganize irq handler Lothar Rubusch
2025-02-16 17:05 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-10 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] iio: accel: adxl345: refac set_interrupts and IRQ map Lothar Rubusch
2025-02-16 17:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-10 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] iio: accel: adxl345: add single tap feature Lothar Rubusch
2025-02-16 17:20 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-10 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] iio: accel: adxl345: add double " Lothar Rubusch
2025-02-16 17:23 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-10 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] iio: accel: adxl345: add double tap suppress bit Lothar Rubusch
2025-02-16 17:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-18 22:29 ` Lothar Rubusch
2025-02-20 17:47 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-10 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] iio: accel: adxl345: add freefall feature Lothar Rubusch
2025-02-16 17:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-10 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] iio: accel: adxl345: extend sample frequency adjustments Lothar Rubusch
2025-02-16 17:38 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-02-10 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] iio: accel: adxl345: add g-range configuration Lothar Rubusch
2025-02-16 17:41 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-10 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] iio: accel: adxl345: add activity event feature Lothar Rubusch
2025-02-16 17:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-10 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] iio: accel: adxl345: add inactivity feature Lothar Rubusch
2025-02-16 17:47 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-10 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] iio: accel: adxl345: add coupling detection for activity/inactivity Lothar Rubusch
2025-02-16 17:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-02-10 11:01 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] docs: iio: add documentation for adxl345 driver Lothar Rubusch
2025-02-16 18:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250216173805.3b629a61@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=eraretuya@gmail.com \
--cc=l.rubusch@gmail.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox