* Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] dt-bindings: iio: adc: rockchip-saradc: Allow use of a power-domain
2025-07-23 8:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] dt-bindings: iio: adc: rockchip-saradc: Allow use of a power-domain Jonas Karlman
@ 2025-07-23 13:47 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-07-23 15:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring (Arm) @ 2025-07-23 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonas Karlman
Cc: Yao Zi, Andy Shevchenko, Chukun Pan, Heiko Stuebner,
linux-arm-kernel, Jonathan Cameron, Conor Dooley, Nuno Sá,
linux-rockchip, David Lechner, linux-kernel, devicetree,
linux-iio, Krzysztof Kozlowski
On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 08:56:45 +0000, Jonas Karlman wrote:
> The SARADC controller in most Rockchip SoCs are part of power domains
> that are always powered on, i.e. PD_BUS or PD_PERI. These always powered
> on power domains have typically not been described in the device tree.
>
> Because these power domains have been left out of the device tree there
> has not been any real need to properly describe the power domain of the
> SARADC controller.
>
> On RK3528 the SARADC controller is part of the PD_VPU power domain.
>
> Add support to describe an optional power-domains for the SARADC
> controller in Rockchip SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
> ---
> v2: Update commit message
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rockchip-saradc.yaml | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] dt-bindings: iio: adc: rockchip-saradc: Allow use of a power-domain
2025-07-23 8:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] dt-bindings: iio: adc: rockchip-saradc: Allow use of a power-domain Jonas Karlman
2025-07-23 13:47 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
@ 2025-07-23 15:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2025-07-23 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonas Karlman
Cc: Heiko Stuebner, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley,
David Lechner, Nuno Sá, Andy Shevchenko, Yao Zi, Chukun Pan,
devicetree, linux-rockchip, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel,
linux-iio
On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 08:56:45 +0000
Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se> wrote:
> The SARADC controller in most Rockchip SoCs are part of power domains
> that are always powered on, i.e. PD_BUS or PD_PERI. These always powered
> on power domains have typically not been described in the device tree.
>
> Because these power domains have been left out of the device tree there
> has not been any real need to properly describe the power domain of the
> SARADC controller.
>
> On RK3528 the SARADC controller is part of the PD_VPU power domain.
>
> Add support to describe an optional power-domains for the SARADC
> controller in Rockchip SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
Applied to the testing branch of iio.git.
I'll be rebasing on rc1 once available.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> v2: Update commit message
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rockchip-saradc.yaml | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rockchip-saradc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rockchip-saradc.yaml
> index 41e0c56ef8e3..f776041fd08f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rockchip-saradc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rockchip-saradc.yaml
> @@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ properties:
> - const: saradc
> - const: apb_pclk
>
> + power-domains:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> resets:
> maxItems: 1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread