From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: "Nuno Sá" <noname.nuno@gmail.com>
Cc: "Kurt Borja" <kuurtb@gmail.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>,
"Lars-Peter Clausen" <lars@metafoo.de>,
"Michael Hennerich" <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
"Benson Leung" <bleung@chromium.org>,
"Antoniu Miclaus" <antoniu.miclaus@analog.com>,
"Gwendal Grignou" <gwendal@chromium.org>,
"Shrikant Raskar" <raskar.shree97@gmail.com>,
"Per-Daniel Olsson" <perdaniel.olsson@axis.com>,
"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
"Guenter Roeck" <groeck@chromium.org>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/6] iio: core: Match iio_device_claim_*() return semantics
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2025 18:05:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251206180546.2a8b8780@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9562673ef83dd73b6092b5a7d2042b380a55700c.camel@gmail.com>
On Thu, 04 Dec 2025 14:23:19 +0000
Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-12-03 at 14:18 -0500, Kurt Borja wrote:
> > In order to improve API consistency with conditional locks, use
> > true/false return semantics in iio_device_claim_buffer_mode().
> >
> > This also matches iio_device_claim_direct() return semantics.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kurt Borja <kuurtb@gmail.com>
> > ---
>
> Even if the rest gets a NACK, I think at least this patch makes sense. In fact I
> would even extend it so that we have the same inline API with proper annotations:
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.18/source/include/linux/iio/iio.h#L679
>
> So it really has the same semantics as iio_device_claim_direct()
Yeah. This was on my mental todo list. So great to see Kurt
dealing with it! :) These calls are much rarer than the direct ones
so I wasn't so fussed about getting the sparse coverage. Makes
sense to do it just wasn't high priority.
As Nuno, suggested though I would like the sparse support for these.
Jonathan
>
> - Nuno Sá
>
> > drivers/iio/adc/ade9000.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c | 5 +----
> > drivers/iio/health/max30100.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/iio/health/max30102.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c | 8 ++++----
> > drivers/iio/light/opt4060.c | 2 +-
> > include/linux/iio/iio.h | 2 +-
> > 7 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ade9000.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ade9000.c
> > index 2de8a718d62a..b345c4d1ef24 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ade9000.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ade9000.c
> > @@ -964,7 +964,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ade9000_dready_thread(int irq, void *data)
> > struct iio_dev *indio_dev = data;
> >
> > /* Handle data ready interrupt from C4/EVENT/DREADY pin */
> > - if (!iio_device_claim_buffer_mode(indio_dev)) {
> > + if (iio_device_claim_buffer_mode(indio_dev)) {
> > ade9000_iio_push_buffer(indio_dev);
> > iio_device_release_buffer_mode(indio_dev);
> > }
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c
> > b/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c
> > index 9ac80e4b7d75..8ed4b2e410c8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c
> > @@ -188,11 +188,8 @@ int cros_ec_sensors_push_data(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > /*
> > * Ignore samples if the buffer is not set: it is needed if the ODR is
> > * set but the buffer is not enabled yet.
> > - *
> > - * Note: iio_device_claim_buffer_mode() returns -EBUSY if the buffer
> > - * is not enabled.
> > */
> > - if (iio_device_claim_buffer_mode(indio_dev) < 0)
> > + if (!iio_device_claim_buffer_mode(indio_dev))
> > return 0;
> >
> > out = (s16 *)st->samples;
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/health/max30100.c b/drivers/iio/health/max30100.c
> > index 3d441013893c..3f3680c4b42f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/health/max30100.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/health/max30100.c
> > @@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ static int max30100_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > * Temperature reading can only be acquired while engine
> > * is running
> > */
> > - if (iio_device_claim_buffer_mode(indio_dev)) {
> > + if (!iio_device_claim_buffer_mode(indio_dev)) {
> > /*
> > * Replacing -EBUSY or other error code
> > * returned by iio_device_claim_buffer_mode()
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/health/max30102.c b/drivers/iio/health/max30102.c
> > index a48c0881a4c7..288c2f37a4a2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/health/max30102.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/health/max30102.c
> > @@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ static int max30102_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > * shutdown; leave shutdown briefly when buffer not running
> > */
> > any_mode_retry:
> > - if (iio_device_claim_buffer_mode(indio_dev)) {
> > + if (!iio_device_claim_buffer_mode(indio_dev)) {
> > /*
> > * This one is a *bit* hacky. If we cannot claim buffer
> > * mode, then try direct mode so that we make sure
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
> > index f69deefcfb6f..a10590ac4e17 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
> > @@ -2224,19 +2224,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__iio_device_release_direct);
> > *
> > * Use with iio_device_release_buffer_mode().
> > *
> > - * Returns: 0 on success, -EBUSY on failure.
> > + * Returns: true on success, false on failure.
> > */
> > -int iio_device_claim_buffer_mode(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> > +bool iio_device_claim_buffer_mode(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> > {
> > struct iio_dev_opaque *iio_dev_opaque = to_iio_dev_opaque(indio_dev);
> >
> > mutex_lock(&iio_dev_opaque->mlock);
> >
> > if (iio_buffer_enabled(indio_dev))
> > - return 0;
> > + return true;
> >
> > mutex_unlock(&iio_dev_opaque->mlock);
> > - return -EBUSY;
> > + return false;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iio_device_claim_buffer_mode);
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/opt4060.c b/drivers/iio/light/opt4060.c
> > index 981c704e7df5..8cb3fa38077e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/light/opt4060.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/light/opt4060.c
> > @@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static int opt4060_set_driver_state(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > struct opt4060_chip *chip = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > int ret = 0;
> > any_mode_retry:
> > - if (iio_device_claim_buffer_mode(indio_dev)) {
> > + if (!iio_device_claim_buffer_mode(indio_dev)) {
> > /*
> > * This one is a *bit* hacky. If we cannot claim buffer mode,
> > * then try direct mode so that we make sure things cannot
> > diff --git a/include/linux/iio/iio.h b/include/linux/iio/iio.h
> > index 872ebdf0dd77..bf7b7337ff1b 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/iio/iio.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/iio/iio.h
> > @@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ static inline void iio_device_release_direct(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> > __release(indio_dev);
> > }
> >
> > -int iio_device_claim_buffer_mode(struct iio_dev *indio_dev);
> > +bool iio_device_claim_buffer_mode(struct iio_dev *indio_dev);
> > void iio_device_release_buffer_mode(struct iio_dev *indio_dev);
> >
> > extern const struct bus_type iio_bus_type;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-06 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-03 19:18 [PATCH RFC 0/6] iio: core: Introduce cleanup.h support for mode locks Kurt Borja
2025-12-03 19:18 ` [PATCH RFC 1/6] iio: core: Match iio_device_claim_*() return semantics Kurt Borja
2025-12-04 14:23 ` Nuno Sá
2025-12-04 15:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-12-06 18:07 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-04 17:27 ` Kurt Borja
2025-12-06 18:05 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-12-07 15:59 ` Kurt Borja
2025-12-03 19:18 ` [PATCH RFC 2/6] iio: core: Match iio_device_claim_*() naming Kurt Borja
2025-12-03 21:50 ` David Lechner
2025-12-04 17:35 ` Kurt Borja
2025-12-06 18:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-03 19:18 ` [PATCH RFC 3/6] iio: core: Add cleanup.h support for iio_device_claim_*() Kurt Borja
2025-12-03 21:50 ` David Lechner
2025-12-03 22:34 ` David Lechner
2025-12-04 17:18 ` Kurt Borja
2025-12-04 17:36 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-12-06 18:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-06 20:40 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-12-07 16:00 ` Kurt Borja
2025-12-06 18:20 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-07 15:59 ` Kurt Borja
2025-12-03 19:18 ` [PATCH RFC 4/6] iio: light: vcnl4000: Use cleanup.h for IIO locks Kurt Borja
2025-12-03 22:19 ` David Lechner
2025-12-03 19:18 ` [PATCH RFC 5/6] iio: health: max30102: " Kurt Borja
2025-12-03 21:52 ` David Lechner
2025-12-04 17:07 ` Kurt Borja
2025-12-04 17:35 ` David Lechner
2025-12-04 17:47 ` Kurt Borja
2025-12-06 18:17 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-07 15:59 ` Kurt Borja
2025-12-03 19:18 ` [PATCH RFC 6/6] iio: light: opt4060: " Kurt Borja
2025-12-03 22:40 ` David Lechner
2025-12-04 17:23 ` Kurt Borja
2025-12-04 14:42 ` Nuno Sá
2025-12-04 17:31 ` Kurt Borja
2025-12-04 14:36 ` [PATCH RFC 0/6] iio: core: Introduce cleanup.h support for mode locks Nuno Sá
2025-12-04 15:07 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-12-06 18:46 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-07 16:00 ` Kurt Borja
2025-12-09 10:34 ` Nuno Sá
2025-12-09 17:05 ` David Lechner
2025-12-10 9:17 ` Nuno Sá
2025-12-10 18:04 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-04 17:33 ` Kurt Borja
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251206180546.2a8b8780@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=antoniu.miclaus@analog.com \
--cc=bleung@chromium.org \
--cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=groeck@chromium.org \
--cc=gwendal@chromium.org \
--cc=kuurtb@gmail.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noname.nuno@gmail.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=perdaniel.olsson@axis.com \
--cc=raskar.shree97@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox