From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Francesco Lavra <flavra@baylibre.com>
Cc: "Lorenzo Bianconi" <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: remove event_threshold field from hw struct
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2025 15:31:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251207153113.20c97fa9@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251201100018.426749-6-flavra@baylibre.com>
On Mon, 1 Dec 2025 11:00:14 +0100
Francesco Lavra <flavra@baylibre.com> wrote:
> This field is used to store the wakeup event detection threshold value.
> When adding support for more event types, some of which may have different
> threshold values for different axes, storing all threshold values for all
> event sources would be cumbersome. Thus, remove this field altogether, and
> read the currently configured value from the sensor when requested by
> userspace.
>
> Signed-off-by: Francesco Lavra <flavra@baylibre.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx.h | 3 +--
> drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c | 12 +++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx.h b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx.h
> index 4200e5231950..b27a833d5107 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx.h
> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx.h
> @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ enum st_lsm6dsx_hw_id {
> #define ST_LSM6DSX_MAX_TAGGED_WORD_LEN ((32 / ST_LSM6DSX_TAGGED_SAMPLE_SIZE) \
> * ST_LSM6DSX_TAGGED_SAMPLE_SIZE)
> #define ST_LSM6DSX_SHIFT_VAL(val, mask) (((val) << __ffs(mask)) & (mask))
> +#define st_lsm6dsx_field_get(mask, reg) ((reg & mask) >> __ffs(mask))
I'm not going to fuss too much about this as expectation is that
this will be replaced soon anyway with a generic version but convention
would be to (reg) & (mask) to avoid precedence of operator problems if
there are any in the parameters passed. The generic version will I guess also deal
with avoiding multiple evaluation of mask.
Anyhow, doesn't matter here given the simple user.
Applied.
Jonathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-07 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-01 10:00 [PATCH v4 0/9] st_lsm6dsx: add tap event detection Francesco Lavra
2025-12-01 10:00 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: fix iio_chan_spec for sensors without " Francesco Lavra
2025-12-07 15:15 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-01 10:00 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: make event_settings more generic Francesco Lavra
2025-12-07 15:21 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-01 10:00 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: move wakeup event enable mask to event_src Francesco Lavra
2025-12-07 15:22 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-01 10:00 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: rework code to check for enabled events Francesco Lavra
2025-12-07 15:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-01 10:00 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: remove event_threshold field from hw struct Francesco Lavra
2025-12-07 15:31 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-12-07 22:50 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-12-01 10:00 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: make event management functions generic Francesco Lavra
2025-12-07 15:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-01 10:00 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: add event configurability on a per axis basis Francesco Lavra
2025-12-07 15:35 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-01 10:00 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: add event spec parameter to iio_chan_spec initializer Francesco Lavra
2025-12-07 15:36 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-01 10:00 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: add tap event detection Francesco Lavra
2025-12-07 15:40 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251207153113.20c97fa9@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=flavra@baylibre.com \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox