public inbox for linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: "Nuno Sá via B4 Relay" <devnull+nuno.sa.analog.com@kernel.org>
Cc: nuno.sa@analog.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] iio: buffer-dma: Fix coding style complains
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2025 11:59:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251221115950.7cbb5848@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251219-iio-dmabuf-improvs-v2-4-caa76de6e873@analog.com>

On Fri, 19 Dec 2025 15:28:15 +0000
Nuno Sá via B4 Relay <devnull+nuno.sa.analog.com@kernel.org> wrote:

> From: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@analog.com>
> 
> Just making sure checkpatch is happy. No functional change intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@analog.com>
I made a couple of small tweaks whilst applying this one. See below.

Jonathan

> ---
>  drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dma.c | 23 ++++++++++-------------
>  include/linux/iio/buffer-dma.h               | 16 ++++++++++------
>  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dma.c b/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dma.c
> index 3ab1349f9ea5..c5ee58effc92 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dma.c
> @@ -169,8 +169,9 @@ static struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *iio_buffer_to_queue(struct iio_buffer *buf)
>  	return container_of(buf, struct iio_dma_buffer_queue, buffer);
>  }
>  
> -static struct iio_dma_buffer_block *iio_dma_buffer_alloc_block(
> -	struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue, size_t size, bool fileio)
> +static struct iio_dma_buffer_block *iio_dma_buffer_alloc_block(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue,
> +							       size_t size,
> +							       bool fileio)
For this one I'd split it as:

static struct iio_dma_buffer_block *
iio_dma_buffer_alloc_block(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue, size_t size,
			   bool fileio)

>  {
>  	struct iio_dma_buffer_block *block __free(kfree) =
>  			kzalloc(sizeof(*block), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -254,7 +255,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iio_dma_buffer_block_done, "IIO_DMA_BUFFER");
>   * hand the blocks back to the queue.
>   */
>  void iio_dma_buffer_block_list_abort(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue,
> -	struct list_head *list)
> +				     struct list_head *list)
>  {
>  	struct iio_dma_buffer_block *block, *_block;
>  	bool cookie;
> @@ -434,7 +435,7 @@ static void iio_dma_buffer_fileio_free(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue)
>  }
>  
>  static void iio_dma_buffer_submit_block(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue,
> -	struct iio_dma_buffer_block *block)
> +					struct iio_dma_buffer_block *block)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  
> @@ -478,8 +479,7 @@ static void iio_dma_buffer_submit_block(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue,
>   *
>   * This will allocate the DMA buffers and start the DMA transfers.
>   */
> -int iio_dma_buffer_enable(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
> -	struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> +int iio_dma_buffer_enable(struct iio_buffer *buffer, struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>  {
>  	struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue = iio_buffer_to_queue(buffer);
>  	struct iio_dma_buffer_block *block, *_block;
> @@ -503,8 +503,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iio_dma_buffer_enable, "IIO_DMA_BUFFER");
>   * Needs to be called when the device that the buffer is attached to stops
>   * sampling. Typically should be the iio_buffer_access_ops disable callback.
>   */
> -int iio_dma_buffer_disable(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
> -	struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> +int iio_dma_buffer_disable(struct iio_buffer *buffer, struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>  {
>  	struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue = iio_buffer_to_queue(buffer);
>  
> @@ -519,7 +518,7 @@ int iio_dma_buffer_disable(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iio_dma_buffer_disable, "IIO_DMA_BUFFER");
>  
>  static void iio_dma_buffer_enqueue(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue,
> -	struct iio_dma_buffer_block *block)
> +				   struct iio_dma_buffer_block *block)
>  {
>  	if (block->state == IIO_BLOCK_STATE_DEAD) {
>  		iio_buffer_block_put(block);
> @@ -531,8 +530,7 @@ static void iio_dma_buffer_enqueue(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static struct iio_dma_buffer_block *iio_dma_buffer_dequeue(
> -	struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue)
> +static struct iio_dma_buffer_block *iio_dma_buffer_dequeue(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue)

static struct iio_dma_buffer_block *
iio_dma_buffer_dequeue(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue)

is a bit nicer than that long line to my eyes and common enough style.

>  {
>  	struct iio_dma_buffer_block *block;
>  	unsigned int idx;
> @@ -661,8 +659,7 @@ size_t iio_dma_buffer_usage(struct iio_buffer *buf)
>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(queue->fileio.blocks); i++) {
>  		block = queue->fileio.blocks[i];
>  
> -		if (block != queue->fileio.active_block
> -		    && block->state == IIO_BLOCK_STATE_DONE)
> +		if (block != queue->fileio.active_block && block->state == IIO_BLOCK_STATE_DONE)
>  			data_available += block->size;
>  	}
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/iio/buffer-dma.h b/include/linux/iio/buffer-dma.h
> index 91f678e5be71..f794af0970bd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iio/buffer-dma.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iio/buffer-dma.h
> @@ -119,7 +119,12 @@ struct iio_dma_buffer_queue {
>  	struct device *dev;
>  	const struct iio_dma_buffer_ops *ops;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * A mutex to protect accessing, configuring (eg: enqueuing DMA blocks)
> +	 * and do file IO on struct iio_dma_buffer_queue objects.
> +	 */
>  	struct mutex lock;
> +	/* A spin lock to protect adding/removing blocks to the queue list */
>  	spinlock_t list_lock;
>  	struct list_head incoming;
>  
> @@ -136,20 +141,19 @@ struct iio_dma_buffer_queue {
>   */
>  struct iio_dma_buffer_ops {
>  	int (*submit)(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue,
> -		struct iio_dma_buffer_block *block);
> +		      struct iio_dma_buffer_block *block);
>  	void (*abort)(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue);
>  };
>  
>  void iio_dma_buffer_block_done(struct iio_dma_buffer_block *block);
>  void iio_dma_buffer_block_list_abort(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue,
> -	struct list_head *list);
> +				     struct list_head *list);
>  
> -int iio_dma_buffer_enable(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
> -	struct iio_dev *indio_dev);
> +int iio_dma_buffer_enable(struct iio_buffer *buffer, struct iio_dev *indio_dev);
>  int iio_dma_buffer_disable(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
> -	struct iio_dev *indio_dev);
> +			   struct iio_dev *indio_dev);
>  int iio_dma_buffer_read(struct iio_buffer *buffer, size_t n,
> -	char __user *user_buffer);
> +			char __user *user_buffer);
>  int iio_dma_buffer_write(struct iio_buffer *buffer, size_t n,
>  			 const char __user *user_buffer);
>  size_t iio_dma_buffer_usage(struct iio_buffer *buffer);
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-21 11:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-19 15:28 [PATCH v2 0/6] iio: buffer-dma: Minor cleanups and improvements Nuno Sá via B4 Relay
2025-12-19 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] iio: buffer-dma: Use lockdep for locking annotations Nuno Sá via B4 Relay
2025-12-19 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] iio: buffer-dma: Use the cleanup.h API Nuno Sá via B4 Relay
2025-12-19 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] iio: buffer-dma: Turn iio_dma_buffer_init() void Nuno Sá via B4 Relay
2025-12-19 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] iio: buffer-dma: Fix coding style complains Nuno Sá via B4 Relay
2025-12-21 11:59   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-12-22 12:38     ` Nuno Sá
2025-12-19 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] iio: buffer-dmaengine: Use the cleanup.h API Nuno Sá via B4 Relay
2025-12-21 12:01   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-22 12:40     ` Nuno Sá
2025-12-19 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] iio: buffer-dmaengine: Fix coding style complains Nuno Sá via B4 Relay
2025-12-21 12:02 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] iio: buffer-dma: Minor cleanups and improvements Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251221115950.7cbb5848@jic23-huawei \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=devnull+nuno.sa.analog.com@kernel.org \
    --cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox