public inbox for linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nuno Sá" <noname.nuno@gmail.com>
To: "Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
	"Nuno Sá via B4 Relay" <devnull+nuno.sa.analog.com@kernel.org>
Cc: nuno.sa@analog.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] iio: buffer-dma: Fix coding style complains
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2025 12:38:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3cf8fa55396b520f0f933477b0e5ec723a79f406.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251221115950.7cbb5848@jic23-huawei>

On Sun, 2025-12-21 at 11:59 +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Dec 2025 15:28:15 +0000
> Nuno Sá via B4 Relay <devnull+nuno.sa.analog.com@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > From: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@analog.com>
> > 
> > Just making sure checkpatch is happy. No functional change intended.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@analog.com>
> I made a couple of small tweaks whilst applying this one. See below.
> 

LGTM... Thanks!

- Nuno Sá

> Jonathan
> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dma.c | 23 ++++++++++-------------
> >  include/linux/iio/buffer-dma.h               | 16 ++++++++++------
> >  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dma.c b/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-
> > buffer-dma.c
> > index 3ab1349f9ea5..c5ee58effc92 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dma.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dma.c
> > @@ -169,8 +169,9 @@ static struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *iio_buffer_to_queue(struct iio_buffer
> > *buf)
> >  	return container_of(buf, struct iio_dma_buffer_queue, buffer);
> >  }
> >  
> > -static struct iio_dma_buffer_block *iio_dma_buffer_alloc_block(
> > -	struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue, size_t size, bool fileio)
> > +static struct iio_dma_buffer_block *iio_dma_buffer_alloc_block(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue
> > *queue,
> > +							       size_t size,
> > +							       bool fileio)
> For this one I'd split it as:
> 
> static struct iio_dma_buffer_block *
> iio_dma_buffer_alloc_block(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue, size_t size,
> 			   bool fileio)
> 
> >  {
> >  	struct iio_dma_buffer_block *block __free(kfree) =
> >  			kzalloc(sizeof(*block), GFP_KERNEL);
> > @@ -254,7 +255,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iio_dma_buffer_block_done, "IIO_DMA_BUFFER");
> >   * hand the blocks back to the queue.
> >   */
> >  void iio_dma_buffer_block_list_abort(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue,
> > -	struct list_head *list)
> > +				     struct list_head *list)
> >  {
> >  	struct iio_dma_buffer_block *block, *_block;
> >  	bool cookie;
> > @@ -434,7 +435,7 @@ static void iio_dma_buffer_fileio_free(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue)
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void iio_dma_buffer_submit_block(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue,
> > -	struct iio_dma_buffer_block *block)
> > +					struct iio_dma_buffer_block *block)
> >  {
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> > @@ -478,8 +479,7 @@ static void iio_dma_buffer_submit_block(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue,
> >   *
> >   * This will allocate the DMA buffers and start the DMA transfers.
> >   */
> > -int iio_dma_buffer_enable(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
> > -	struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> > +int iio_dma_buffer_enable(struct iio_buffer *buffer, struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> >  {
> >  	struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue = iio_buffer_to_queue(buffer);
> >  	struct iio_dma_buffer_block *block, *_block;
> > @@ -503,8 +503,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iio_dma_buffer_enable, "IIO_DMA_BUFFER");
> >   * Needs to be called when the device that the buffer is attached to stops
> >   * sampling. Typically should be the iio_buffer_access_ops disable callback.
> >   */
> > -int iio_dma_buffer_disable(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
> > -	struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> > +int iio_dma_buffer_disable(struct iio_buffer *buffer, struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> >  {
> >  	struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue = iio_buffer_to_queue(buffer);
> >  
> > @@ -519,7 +518,7 @@ int iio_dma_buffer_disable(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iio_dma_buffer_disable, "IIO_DMA_BUFFER");
> >  
> >  static void iio_dma_buffer_enqueue(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue,
> > -	struct iio_dma_buffer_block *block)
> > +				   struct iio_dma_buffer_block *block)
> >  {
> >  	if (block->state == IIO_BLOCK_STATE_DEAD) {
> >  		iio_buffer_block_put(block);
> > @@ -531,8 +530,7 @@ static void iio_dma_buffer_enqueue(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue,
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> > -static struct iio_dma_buffer_block *iio_dma_buffer_dequeue(
> > -	struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue)
> > +static struct iio_dma_buffer_block *iio_dma_buffer_dequeue(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue)
> 
> static struct iio_dma_buffer_block *
> iio_dma_buffer_dequeue(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue)
> 
> is a bit nicer than that long line to my eyes and common enough style.
> 
> >  {
> >  	struct iio_dma_buffer_block *block;
> >  	unsigned int idx;
> > @@ -661,8 +659,7 @@ size_t iio_dma_buffer_usage(struct iio_buffer *buf)
> >  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(queue->fileio.blocks); i++) {
> >  		block = queue->fileio.blocks[i];
> >  
> > -		if (block != queue->fileio.active_block
> > -		    && block->state == IIO_BLOCK_STATE_DONE)
> > +		if (block != queue->fileio.active_block && block->state ==
> > IIO_BLOCK_STATE_DONE)
> >  			data_available += block->size;
> >  	}
> >  
> > diff --git a/include/linux/iio/buffer-dma.h b/include/linux/iio/buffer-dma.h
> > index 91f678e5be71..f794af0970bd 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/iio/buffer-dma.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/iio/buffer-dma.h
> > @@ -119,7 +119,12 @@ struct iio_dma_buffer_queue {
> >  	struct device *dev;
> >  	const struct iio_dma_buffer_ops *ops;
> >  
> > +	/*
> > +	 * A mutex to protect accessing, configuring (eg: enqueuing DMA blocks)
> > +	 * and do file IO on struct iio_dma_buffer_queue objects.
> > +	 */
> >  	struct mutex lock;
> > +	/* A spin lock to protect adding/removing blocks to the queue list */
> >  	spinlock_t list_lock;
> >  	struct list_head incoming;
> >  
> > @@ -136,20 +141,19 @@ struct iio_dma_buffer_queue {
> >   */
> >  struct iio_dma_buffer_ops {
> >  	int (*submit)(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue,
> > -		struct iio_dma_buffer_block *block);
> > +		      struct iio_dma_buffer_block *block);
> >  	void (*abort)(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue);
> >  };
> >  
> >  void iio_dma_buffer_block_done(struct iio_dma_buffer_block *block);
> >  void iio_dma_buffer_block_list_abort(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue,
> > -	struct list_head *list);
> > +				     struct list_head *list);
> >  
> > -int iio_dma_buffer_enable(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
> > -	struct iio_dev *indio_dev);
> > +int iio_dma_buffer_enable(struct iio_buffer *buffer, struct iio_dev *indio_dev);
> >  int iio_dma_buffer_disable(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
> > -	struct iio_dev *indio_dev);
> > +			   struct iio_dev *indio_dev);
> >  int iio_dma_buffer_read(struct iio_buffer *buffer, size_t n,
> > -	char __user *user_buffer);
> > +			char __user *user_buffer);
> >  int iio_dma_buffer_write(struct iio_buffer *buffer, size_t n,
> >  			 const char __user *user_buffer);
> >  size_t iio_dma_buffer_usage(struct iio_buffer *buffer);
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-22 12:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-19 15:28 [PATCH v2 0/6] iio: buffer-dma: Minor cleanups and improvements Nuno Sá via B4 Relay
2025-12-19 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] iio: buffer-dma: Use lockdep for locking annotations Nuno Sá via B4 Relay
2025-12-19 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] iio: buffer-dma: Use the cleanup.h API Nuno Sá via B4 Relay
2025-12-19 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] iio: buffer-dma: Turn iio_dma_buffer_init() void Nuno Sá via B4 Relay
2025-12-19 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] iio: buffer-dma: Fix coding style complains Nuno Sá via B4 Relay
2025-12-21 11:59   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-22 12:38     ` Nuno Sá [this message]
2025-12-19 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] iio: buffer-dmaengine: Use the cleanup.h API Nuno Sá via B4 Relay
2025-12-21 12:01   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-22 12:40     ` Nuno Sá
2025-12-19 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] iio: buffer-dmaengine: Fix coding style complains Nuno Sá via B4 Relay
2025-12-21 12:02 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] iio: buffer-dma: Minor cleanups and improvements Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3cf8fa55396b520f0f933477b0e5ec723a79f406.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=noname.nuno@gmail.com \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=devnull+nuno.sa.analog.com@kernel.org \
    --cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox