* ad7768-1: GPIO reset path delays do not match the datasheet
@ 2026-05-13 15:00 Stepan Ionichev
2026-05-13 20:37 ` Andy Shevchenko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stepan Ionichev @ 2026-05-13 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael.Hennerich, nuno.sa
Cc: lars, jic23, dlechner, andy, linux-iio, linux-kernel, sozdayvek
Hi all,
Reading drivers/iio/adc/ad7768-1.c I noticed the GPIO reset path
uses two bare fsleep() calls that seem to disagree with the AD7768-1
datasheet (Rev. B). I do not have AD7768-1 hardware to test this,
so I am reporting it rather than sending a patch -- maybe someone
with a board can verify and fix.
Code (drivers/iio/adc/ad7768-1.c, around lines 1249-1252):
if (st->gpio_reset) {
fsleep(10);
gpiod_set_value_cansleep(st->gpio_reset, 0);
fsleep(200);
}
Compared with the datasheet (AD7768-1 Rev. B, page 6, Table 1
"Specifications", ADC RESET section):
Reset Low Pulse Width minimum 100 us
ADC Start-Up Time After Reset 17 ms
(Reset rising edge to first DRDY,
PIN mode, decimate by 8)
So the in-tree code:
- holds the RESET pin low for ~10 us, where the datasheet
requires a minimum of 100 us;
- waits ~200 us after deasserting RESET before issuing SPI
traffic / set_mode, where the datasheet specifies 17 ms from
the reset rising edge to the first DRDY.
The neighbouring SPI-reset branch already cites the datasheet
(page 70), which is why this jumped out.
If anyone with an AD7768-1 board can confirm whether the chip
actually needs the datasheet-spec timing (or whether something
else makes the shorter waits fine in practice), this looks worth
a follow-up patch -- something like:
if (st->gpio_reset) {
/* RESET low pulse width: datasheet Rev. B, page 6,
* Table 1, min 100 us. */
fsleep(100);
gpiod_set_value_cansleep(st->gpio_reset, 0);
/* ADC start-up time after reset: datasheet Rev. B,
* page 6, Table 1, 17 ms (reset rising edge to first
* DRDY, PIN mode, decimate by 8). */
msleep(17);
}
I am happy to send the patch myself if someone with hardware
confirms it does not regress -- I would rather not submit an
untested timing change blind.
Stepan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: ad7768-1: GPIO reset path delays do not match the datasheet
2026-05-13 15:00 ad7768-1: GPIO reset path delays do not match the datasheet Stepan Ionichev
@ 2026-05-13 20:37 ` Andy Shevchenko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2026-05-13 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stepan Ionichev
Cc: Michael.Hennerich, nuno.sa, lars, jic23, dlechner, andy,
linux-iio, linux-kernel
On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 08:00:42PM +0500, Stepan Ionichev wrote:
> Reading drivers/iio/adc/ad7768-1.c I noticed the GPIO reset path
> uses two bare fsleep() calls that seem to disagree with the AD7768-1
> datasheet (Rev. B). I do not have AD7768-1 hardware to test this,
> so I am reporting it rather than sending a patch -- maybe someone
> with a board can verify and fix.
...
> I am happy to send the patch myself if someone with hardware
> confirms it does not regress -- I would rather not submit an
> untested timing change blind.
This is ADI chip, right? We have a few senior developers from there in this ML,
let's ask them!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-13 20:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-05-13 15:00 ad7768-1: GPIO reset path delays do not match the datasheet Stepan Ionichev
2026-05-13 20:37 ` Andy Shevchenko
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox