From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: "Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga" <azpijr@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] iio: light: add support for APDS9999 sensor
Date: Sat, 16 May 2026 15:58:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260516155844.1308ee10@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f389419972fc790a25b6041f1212e15f155804e2.1778659152.git.azpijr@gmail.com>
On Wed, 13 May 2026 10:10:35 +0200
"Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga" <azpijr@gmail.com> wrote:
> Add IIO driver for Broadcom APDS9999 ambient light sensor.
>
> The APDS9999 is a digital proximity and RGB sensor with ALS
> capability. This driver implements the ALS/Lux functionality using
> the green channel, which uses optical coating technology to
> approximate the human eye spectral response.
Can wrap commit messages to 75 chars.
>
> Proximity (PS) and RGB color features are not yet implemented.
Needs an update (sashiko pointed this out)
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1778659152.git.azpijr%40gmail.com
>
> Signed-off-by: Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga <azpijr@gmail.com>
A few minor things inline.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/apds9999.c b/drivers/iio/light/apds9999.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..577b93f61d31
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/iio/light/apds9999.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,344 @@
> +static int apds9999_init(struct apds9999_data *data)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &data->client->dev;
> + struct i2c_client *client = data->client;
> + u8 reg;
I think regval makes it more obvious this isn't a register address.
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, apds9999_standby, client);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + guard(mutex)(&data->lock);
> +
> + reg = FIELD_PREP(APDS9999_LS_RES_MASK, APDS9999_RES_18BIT) |
> + FIELD_PREP(APDS9999_LS_RATE_MASK, APDS9999_RATE_100_MS);
> + ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, APDS9999_REG_LS_MEAS_RATE, reg);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + data->als_res = APDS9999_RES_18BIT;
> + data->als_rate = APDS9999_RATE_100_MS;
> +
> + ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, APDS9999_REG_LS_GAIN,
> + APDS9999_GAIN_3X);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + data->als_gain_idx = APDS9999_GAIN_3X;
> +
> + ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, APDS9999_REG_MAIN_CTRL,
> + APDS9999_MAIN_CTRL_LS_EN);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return 0;
return i2c_smbus_write_byte_data()
> +}
> +
> +static int apds9999_read_channel(struct apds9999_data *data, u8 reg, u32 *counts)
> +{
> + struct i2c_client *client = data->client;
> + u8 buf[3];
> + int ret, tries;
> +
> + guard(mutex)(&data->lock);
> +
> + /*
> + * Poll MAIN_STATUS for new data. Timeout: ~2 integration periods
> + * plus margin. Each try sleeps 20 ms.
> + */
> + tries = max(2, (apds9999_itimes_us[data->als_res] * 2) / 20000);
> +
> + while (tries--) {
> + ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client,
> + APDS9999_REG_MAIN_STATUS);
Off by one space and it's under 80 chars anyway (would have been fine if a little
over a well).
ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, APDS9999_REG_MAIN_STATUS);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + if (ret & APDS9999_MAIN_STATUS_LS_DATA)
> + break;
> + fsleep(20000);
> + }
> +
> + if (tries < 0)
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +
> + ret = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(client, reg, sizeof(buf), buf);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + if (ret != sizeof(buf))
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + *counts = get_unaligned_le24(buf) & GENMASK(19, 0);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int apds9999_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> + struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> + int *val, int *val2, long mask)
> +{
> + struct apds9999_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + int gain, itime_us;
> + u64 scale_nano;
> + u32 counts;
> + int ret;
> +
> + switch (mask) {
> + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
> + switch (chan->type) {
> + case IIO_LIGHT:
> + ret = apds9999_read_channel(data,
> + APDS9999_REG_LS_DATA_GREEN_0,
> + &counts);
if (ret)
return ret;
*val = (int)counts;
return IIO_VAL_COUNT;
(See below)
> + break;
> + case IIO_INTENSITY:
> + ret = apds9999_read_channel(data, chan->address,
> + &counts);
> + break;
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
I'd shift this up so all errors are dealt with at source. Means we don't need
to read on to see where they are going...
> + *val = (int)counts;
> + return IIO_VAL_INT;
Not worth sharing this either given only save a tiny bit.
> +
> + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
> + /*
> + * Scale (lux per count) = 54 / (gain * integration_time_ms)
> + *
> + * The constant 54 is derived from the datasheet table:
> + * at gain = 3x, itime = 100 ms -> 0.180 lux/count
> + * -> C = 0.180 * 3 * 100 = 54
> + *
> + * Expressed as IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO.
> + */
> + gain = apds9999_gains[data->als_gain_idx];
> + itime_us = apds9999_itimes_us[data->als_res];
> +
> + /* scale_nano = 54e12 / (gain * itime_us) nano-lux/count */
> + scale_nano = div_u64(54000000000000ULL, (u32)(gain * itime_us));
> + *val = (int)(scale_nano / NSEC_PER_SEC);
> + *val2 = (int)(scale_nano % NSEC_PER_SEC);
> + return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO;
> +
> + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_INT_TIME:
> + *val = 0;
> + *val2 = apds9999_itimes_us[data->als_res];
> + return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
> +
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static const struct iio_chan_spec apds9999_channels[] = {
> + {
> + .type = IIO_LIGHT,
> + .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) |
> + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE),
> + .info_mask_shared_by_all = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_INT_TIME),
> + },
> + {
> + .type = IIO_INTENSITY,
> + .modified = 1,
> + .channel2 = IIO_MOD_LIGHT_RED,
> + .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW),
> + .info_mask_shared_by_all = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_INT_TIME),
> + .address = APDS9999_REG_LS_DATA_RED_0,
> + },
> + {
> + .type = IIO_INTENSITY,
> + .modified = 1,
> + .channel2 = IIO_MOD_LIGHT_GREEN,
> + .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW),
> + .info_mask_shared_by_all = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_INT_TIME),
> + .address = APDS9999_REG_LS_DATA_GREEN_0,
> + },
> + {
> + .type = IIO_INTENSITY,
> + .modified = 1,
> + .channel2 = IIO_MOD_LIGHT_BLUE,
> + .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW),
> + .info_mask_shared_by_all = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_INT_TIME),
> + .address = APDS9999_REG_LS_DATA_BLUE_0,
> + },
> + {
> + .type = IIO_INTENSITY,
> + .modified = 1,
> + .channel2 = IIO_MOD_LIGHT_CLEAR,
Why clear rather than IR? Sashiko even noticed this.
> + .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW),
> + .info_mask_shared_by_all = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_INT_TIME),
> + .address = APDS9999_REG_LS_DATA_IR_0,
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct i2c_device_id apds9999_id[] = {
> + { "apds9999" },
Whilst not traditionally done, we are moving towards using c99 for this.
{ .name = "apds9999" }
preferred. Doesn't actually matter if only a name, but later fields
are likely to soon become a union. For consistency and ease of explanation
I think always using named structure fields is a good direction to move in.
> + { }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, apds9999_id);
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id apds9999_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "brcm,apds9999" },
> + { }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, apds9999_of_match);
> +
> +static struct i2c_driver apds9999_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "apds9999",
> + .of_match_table = apds9999_of_match,
> + },
> + .probe = apds9999_probe,
> + .id_table = apds9999_id,
> +};
> +module_i2c_driver(apds9999_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga <azpijr@gmail.com>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("APDS-9999 Lux Light Sensor IIO Driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-16 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-13 8:09 [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] iio: light: add support for Broadcom APDS9999 Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga
2026-05-13 8:10 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: light: add " Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga
2026-05-16 14:47 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-05-13 8:10 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] iio: light: add support for APDS9999 sensor Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga
2026-05-16 14:58 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2026-05-16 15:28 ` David Lechner
2026-05-16 16:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-05-16 18:19 ` David Lechner
2026-05-17 11:40 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-05-16 14:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] iio: light: add support for Broadcom APDS9999 Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260516155844.1308ee10@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=azpijr@gmail.com \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox