* [PATCH 11/12] gpio: gpiolib-kunit: use devm_blocking_notifier_chain_register()
2026-07-23 17:56 [PATCH 10/12] gpio: eic-sprd: use devm_atomic_notifier_chain_register() Eliav Farber
@ 2026-07-23 17:56 ` Eliav Farber
2026-07-24 7:47 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-07-23 17:56 ` [PATCH 12/12] reboot: " Eliav Farber
2026-07-24 7:46 ` [PATCH 10/12] gpio: eic-sprd: use devm_atomic_notifier_chain_register() Bartosz Golaszewski
2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eliav Farber @ 2026-07-23 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rafael, tony.luck, bp, guohanjun, mchehab, xueshuai, lenb,
laurent.pinchart, linusw, brgl, orsonzhai, baolin.wang,
zhang.lyra, jic23, dlechner, nuno.sa, andy, dmitry.torokhov,
hansg, ilpo.jarvinen, W_Armin, ukleinek, fabio.m.de.francesco,
kaihengf, ankita, leitao, farbere, jason, pedro.pbg, paulmck,
frederic, kees, linux-acpi, linux-kernel, linux-gpio, linux-pwm,
linux-iio, linux-input, platform-driver-x86
Replace the blocking_notifier_chain_register() +
devm_add_action_or_reset() pattern with a single call to
devm_blocking_notifier_chain_register(), removing the
gpio_unbind_unregister_notifier() callback.
Signed-off-by: Eliav Farber <farbere@amazon.com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-kunit.c | 14 ++------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-kunit.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-kunit.c
index 380b68f879e5..8ce9acc89e29 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-kunit.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-kunit.c
@@ -237,13 +237,6 @@ static int gpio_unbind_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action,
return NOTIFY_OK;
}
-static void gpio_unbind_unregister_notifier(void *data)
-{
- struct notifier_block *nb = data;
-
- blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(&gpio_unbind_notifier, nb);
-}
-
static int gpio_unbind_consumer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct gpio_unbind_consumer_drvdata *data;
@@ -261,11 +254,8 @@ static int gpio_unbind_consumer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return PTR_ERR(data->desc);
data->nb.notifier_call = gpio_unbind_notify;
- ret = blocking_notifier_chain_register(&gpio_unbind_notifier, &data->nb);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
- ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, gpio_unbind_unregister_notifier, &data->nb);
+ ret = devm_blocking_notifier_chain_register(dev, &gpio_unbind_notifier,
+ &data->nb);
if (ret)
return ret;
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 11/12] gpio: gpiolib-kunit: use devm_blocking_notifier_chain_register()
2026-07-23 17:56 ` [PATCH 11/12] gpio: gpiolib-kunit: use devm_blocking_notifier_chain_register() Eliav Farber
@ 2026-07-24 7:47 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bartosz Golaszewski @ 2026-07-24 7:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eliav Farber
Cc: rafael, tony.luck, bp, guohanjun, mchehab, xueshuai, lenb,
laurent.pinchart, linusw, brgl, orsonzhai, baolin.wang,
zhang.lyra, jic23, dlechner, nuno.sa, andy, dmitry.torokhov,
hansg, ilpo.jarvinen, W_Armin, ukleinek, fabio.m.de.francesco,
kaihengf, ankita, leitao, jason, pedro.pbg, paulmck, frederic,
kees, linux-acpi, linux-kernel, linux-gpio, linux-pwm, linux-iio,
linux-input, platform-driver-x86
On Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:56:31 +0200, Eliav Farber <farbere@amazon.com> said:
> Replace the blocking_notifier_chain_register() +
> devm_add_action_or_reset() pattern with a single call to
> devm_blocking_notifier_chain_register(), removing the
> gpio_unbind_unregister_notifier() callback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eliav Farber <farbere@amazon.com>
> ---
This could conflict with the changes I already have queued so either it waits
until the next cycle or I'd need an immutable branch with patch 1/12.
Bartosz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 12/12] reboot: use devm_blocking_notifier_chain_register()
2026-07-23 17:56 [PATCH 10/12] gpio: eic-sprd: use devm_atomic_notifier_chain_register() Eliav Farber
2026-07-23 17:56 ` [PATCH 11/12] gpio: gpiolib-kunit: use devm_blocking_notifier_chain_register() Eliav Farber
@ 2026-07-23 17:56 ` Eliav Farber
2026-07-24 7:46 ` [PATCH 10/12] gpio: eic-sprd: use devm_atomic_notifier_chain_register() Bartosz Golaszewski
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eliav Farber @ 2026-07-23 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rafael, tony.luck, bp, guohanjun, mchehab, xueshuai, lenb,
laurent.pinchart, linusw, brgl, orsonzhai, baolin.wang,
zhang.lyra, jic23, dlechner, nuno.sa, andy, dmitry.torokhov,
hansg, ilpo.jarvinen, W_Armin, ukleinek, fabio.m.de.francesco,
kaihengf, ankita, leitao, farbere, jason, pedro.pbg, paulmck,
frederic, kees, linux-acpi, linux-kernel, linux-gpio, linux-pwm,
linux-iio, linux-input, platform-driver-x86
Replace the blocking_notifier_chain_register() +
devm_add_action_or_reset() pattern with a single call to
devm_blocking_notifier_chain_register(), removing the
devm_unregister_reboot_notifier() callback.
Signed-off-by: Eliav Farber <farbere@amazon.com>
---
kernel/reboot.c | 24 ++----------------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/reboot.c b/kernel/reboot.c
index 695c33e75efd..557609419989 100644
--- a/kernel/reboot.c
+++ b/kernel/reboot.c
@@ -136,30 +136,10 @@ int unregister_reboot_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_reboot_notifier);
-static void devm_unregister_reboot_notifier(struct device *dev, void *res)
-{
- WARN_ON(unregister_reboot_notifier(*(struct notifier_block **)res));
-}
-
int devm_register_reboot_notifier(struct device *dev, struct notifier_block *nb)
{
- struct notifier_block **rcnb;
- int ret;
-
- rcnb = devres_alloc(devm_unregister_reboot_notifier,
- sizeof(*rcnb), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!rcnb)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- ret = register_reboot_notifier(nb);
- if (!ret) {
- *rcnb = nb;
- devres_add(dev, rcnb);
- } else {
- devres_free(rcnb);
- }
-
- return ret;
+ return devm_blocking_notifier_chain_register(dev,
+ &reboot_notifier_list, nb);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(devm_register_reboot_notifier);
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 10/12] gpio: eic-sprd: use devm_atomic_notifier_chain_register()
2026-07-23 17:56 [PATCH 10/12] gpio: eic-sprd: use devm_atomic_notifier_chain_register() Eliav Farber
2026-07-23 17:56 ` [PATCH 11/12] gpio: gpiolib-kunit: use devm_blocking_notifier_chain_register() Eliav Farber
2026-07-23 17:56 ` [PATCH 12/12] reboot: " Eliav Farber
@ 2026-07-24 7:46 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bartosz Golaszewski @ 2026-07-24 7:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eliav Farber
Cc: rafael, tony.luck, bp, guohanjun, mchehab, xueshuai, lenb,
laurent.pinchart, linusw, brgl, orsonzhai, baolin.wang,
zhang.lyra, jic23, dlechner, nuno.sa, andy, dmitry.torokhov,
hansg, ilpo.jarvinen, W_Armin, ukleinek, fabio.m.de.francesco,
kaihengf, ankita, leitao, jason, pedro.pbg, paulmck, frederic,
kees, linux-acpi, linux-kernel, linux-gpio, linux-pwm, linux-iio,
linux-input, platform-driver-x86
On Thu, 23 Jul 2026 19:56:30 +0200, Eliav Farber <farbere@amazon.com> said:
> Replace the atomic_notifier_chain_register() +
> devm_add_action_or_reset() pattern with a single call to
> devm_atomic_notifier_chain_register(), removing the
> sprd_eic_unregister_notifier() callback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eliav Farber <farbere@amazon.com>
> ---
Acked-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread