public inbox for linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <Eugen.Hristev@microchip.com>
To: <alexandru.Ardelean@analog.com>, <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: <Ludovic.Desroches@microchip.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] iio: at91-sama5d2_adc: split at91_adc_current_chan_is_touch() helper
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:20:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <208699ad-1302-aac1-c2e7-4f469e39a7eb@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f13b4286c5f133e7461d59965d7f84af059c8e89.camel@analog.com>

On 15.04.2020 09:33, Ardelean, Alexandru wrote:

> On Tue, 2020-04-14 at 18:45 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 12:22:45 +0000
>> <Eugen.Hristev@microchip.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 13.04.2020 20:05, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 10:42:18 +0200
>>>> Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This change moves the logic to check if the current channel is the
>>>>> touchscreen channel to a separate helper.
>>>>> This reduces some code duplication, but the main intent is to re-use
>>>>> this
>>>>> in the next patches.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
>>>> Eugen / Ludovic,
>>>>
>>>> Have you had a chance to look at this series?
>>>
>>> Hi Jonathan,
>>>
>>> Does the patch apply correctly for you ?
>>
>> I haven't tried yet :)
>>
> 
> I've rebased this patchset on top of current iio/testing and it still applies.
> 

Hi Alex,

I tried this patch on top of my tree (however I am testing with an older 
kernel 5.4) , and I have issues starting the buffer after you moved my 
code to the preenable callback.

Namely, on the line:

if (!(indio_dev->currentmode & INDIO_ALL_TRIGGERED_MODES))
                return -EINVAL;

And with this , the preenable fails on my side, because the current mode 
is not yet switched to triggered.

I do remember adding this line with a specific reason. It may be related 
to touchscreen operations, but I have to retest the touch with and 
without this line and your patch.

Meanwhile, maybe you have any suggestions on how to fix the buffer ? 
This check here makes any sense to you ?

Thanks,
Eugen

> 
>>> I will try to test it , if I manage to apply it.
>>> I can only test the ADC though because at this moment I do not have a
>>> touchscreen at disposal.
>>>
>>> Meanwhile, the code looks good for me,
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@microchip.com>
>>>
>>> By the way, I do not know if my two pending patches on this driver will
>>> conflict or not.
>>
>> As this is a long term rework patch at heart, there isn't any particular
>> rush as long as we don't loose it forever!
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>>> Eugen
>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Jonathan
>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> This patchset continues discussion:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20191023082508.17583-1-alexandru.ardelean@analog.com/__;!!A3Ni8CS0y2Y!ql1bYiNMPFlz1twnCCAQpiEBvpzxR_VHAPL712rWFfwy2TSKjZ2UhGBoV7-29Syny6z0yg$
>>>>>
>>>>> Apologies for the delay.
>>>>>
>>>>> Changelog v1 -> v2:
>>>>> * added patch 'iio: at91-sama5d2_adc: split
>>>>> at91_adc_current_chan_is_touch()
>>>>>     helper'
>>>>> * renamed at91_adc_buffer_postenable() -> at91_adc_buffer_preenable()
>>>>>     - at91_adc_buffer_postenable() - now just calls
>>>>>       iio_triggered_buffer_postenable() if the channel isn't the
>>>>> touchscreen
>>>>>       channel
>>>>> * renamed at91_adc_buffer_predisable() -> at91_adc_buffer_postdisable()
>>>>>     - at91_adc_buffer_predisable() - now just calls
>>>>>       iio_triggered_buffer_predisable() if the channel isn't the
>>>>> touchscreen
>>>>>       channel
>>>>>
>>>>>    drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c | 31 +++++++++++++++---------------
>>>>>    1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/at91-
>>>>> sama5d2_adc.c
>>>>> index a5c7771227d5..f2a74c47c768 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c
>>>>> @@ -873,18 +873,24 @@ static int at91_adc_dma_start(struct iio_dev
>>>>> *indio_dev)
>>>>>         return 0;
>>>>>    }
>>>>>
>>>>> +static bool at91_adc_current_chan_is_touch(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +     struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +     return !!bitmap_subset(indio_dev->active_scan_mask,
>>>>> +                            &st->touch_st.channels_bitmask,
>>>>> +                            AT91_SAMA5D2_MAX_CHAN_IDX + 1);
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>>    static int at91_adc_buffer_postenable(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>>>>>    {
>>>>>         int ret;
>>>>>         struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>>>>>
>>>>>         /* check if we are enabling triggered buffer or the touchscreen
>>>>> */
>>>>> -     if (bitmap_subset(indio_dev->active_scan_mask,
>>>>> -                       &st->touch_st.channels_bitmask,
>>>>> -                       AT91_SAMA5D2_MAX_CHAN_IDX + 1)) {
>>>>> -             /* touchscreen enabling */
>>>>> +     if (at91_adc_current_chan_is_touch(indio_dev))
>>>>>                 return at91_adc_configure_touch(st, true);
>>>>> -     }
>>>>> +
>>>>>         /* if we are not in triggered mode, we cannot enable the buffer.
>>>>> */
>>>>>         if (!(indio_dev->currentmode & INDIO_ALL_TRIGGERED_MODES))
>>>>>                 return -EINVAL;
>>>>> @@ -906,12 +912,9 @@ static int at91_adc_buffer_predisable(struct
>>>>> iio_dev *indio_dev)
>>>>>         u8 bit;
>>>>>
>>>>>         /* check if we are disabling triggered buffer or the touchscreen
>>>>> */
>>>>> -     if (bitmap_subset(indio_dev->active_scan_mask,
>>>>> -                       &st->touch_st.channels_bitmask,
>>>>> -                       AT91_SAMA5D2_MAX_CHAN_IDX + 1)) {
>>>>> -             /* touchscreen disable */
>>>>> +     if (at91_adc_current_chan_is_touch(indio_dev))
>>>>>                 return at91_adc_configure_touch(st, false);
>>>>> -     }
>>>>> +
>>>>>         /* if we are not in triggered mode, nothing to do here */
>>>>>         if (!(indio_dev->currentmode & INDIO_ALL_TRIGGERED_MODES))
>>>>>                 return -EINVAL;
>>>>> @@ -1886,14 +1889,10 @@ static __maybe_unused int at91_adc_resume(struct
>>>>> device *dev)
>>>>>                 return 0;
>>>>>
>>>>>         /* check if we are enabling triggered buffer or the touchscreen
>>>>> */
>>>>> -     if (bitmap_subset(indio_dev->active_scan_mask,
>>>>> -                       &st->touch_st.channels_bitmask,
>>>>> -                       AT91_SAMA5D2_MAX_CHAN_IDX + 1)) {
>>>>> -             /* touchscreen enabling */
>>>>> +     if (at91_adc_current_chan_is_touch(indio_dev))
>>>>>                 return at91_adc_configure_touch(st, true);
>>>>> -     } else {
>>>>> +     else
>>>>>                 return at91_adc_configure_trigger(st->trig, true);
>>>>> -     }
>>>>>
>>>>>         /* not needed but more explicit */
>>>>>         return 0;
>>>>


  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-27 12:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-04  8:42 [PATCH v2 1/2] iio: at91-sama5d2_adc: split at91_adc_current_chan_is_touch() helper Alexandru Ardelean
2020-03-04  8:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] iio: at91-sama5d2_adc: adjust iio_triggered_buffer_{predisable,postenable} positions Alexandru Ardelean
2020-04-19 10:04   ` ludovic.desroches
2020-04-23 10:56     ` Eugen.Hristev
2020-04-13 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] iio: at91-sama5d2_adc: split at91_adc_current_chan_is_touch() helper Jonathan Cameron
2020-04-14 12:22   ` Eugen.Hristev
2020-04-14 17:45     ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-04-15  6:33       ` Ardelean, Alexandru
2020-04-27 12:20         ` Eugen.Hristev [this message]
2020-04-27 13:00           ` Ardelean, Alexandru
2020-04-30  7:30             ` Ardelean, Alexandru
2020-04-30  8:10               ` Ardelean, Alexandru
2020-05-02 17:31                 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-04-15  6:43     ` ludovic.desroches
2020-04-18 17:58       ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-04-19 10:09         ` ludovic.desroches
2020-04-25 15:06           ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=208699ad-1302-aac1-c2e7-4f469e39a7eb@microchip.com \
    --to=eugen.hristev@microchip.com \
    --cc=Ludovic.Desroches@microchip.com \
    --cc=alexandru.Ardelean@analog.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox