From: "Ardelean, Alexandru" <alexandru.Ardelean@analog.com>
To: "Eugen.Hristev@microchip.com" <Eugen.Hristev@microchip.com>,
"jic23@kernel.org" <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: "Ludovic.Desroches@microchip.com"
<Ludovic.Desroches@microchip.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] iio: at91-sama5d2_adc: split at91_adc_current_chan_is_touch() helper
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 06:33:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f13b4286c5f133e7461d59965d7f84af059c8e89.camel@analog.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200414184505.0cd39249@archlinux>
On Tue, 2020-04-14 at 18:45 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 12:22:45 +0000
> <Eugen.Hristev@microchip.com> wrote:
>
> > On 13.04.2020 20:05, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > > On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 10:42:18 +0200
> > > Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > This change moves the logic to check if the current channel is the
> > > > touchscreen channel to a separate helper.
> > > > This reduces some code duplication, but the main intent is to re-use
> > > > this
> > > > in the next patches.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
> > > Eugen / Ludovic,
> > >
> > > Have you had a chance to look at this series?
> >
> > Hi Jonathan,
> >
> > Does the patch apply correctly for you ?
>
> I haven't tried yet :)
>
I've rebased this patchset on top of current iio/testing and it still applies.
> > I will try to test it , if I manage to apply it.
> > I can only test the ADC though because at this moment I do not have a
> > touchscreen at disposal.
> >
> > Meanwhile, the code looks good for me,
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@microchip.com>
> >
> > By the way, I do not know if my two pending patches on this driver will
> > conflict or not.
>
> As this is a long term rework patch at heart, there isn't any particular
> rush as long as we don't loose it forever!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>
> > Eugen
> >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Jonathan
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > This patchset continues discussion:
> > > >
> > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20191023082508.17583-1-alexandru.ardelean@analog.com/__;!!A3Ni8CS0y2Y!ql1bYiNMPFlz1twnCCAQpiEBvpzxR_VHAPL712rWFfwy2TSKjZ2UhGBoV7-29Syny6z0yg$
> > > >
> > > > Apologies for the delay.
> > > >
> > > > Changelog v1 -> v2:
> > > > * added patch 'iio: at91-sama5d2_adc: split
> > > > at91_adc_current_chan_is_touch()
> > > > helper'
> > > > * renamed at91_adc_buffer_postenable() -> at91_adc_buffer_preenable()
> > > > - at91_adc_buffer_postenable() - now just calls
> > > > iio_triggered_buffer_postenable() if the channel isn't the
> > > > touchscreen
> > > > channel
> > > > * renamed at91_adc_buffer_predisable() -> at91_adc_buffer_postdisable()
> > > > - at91_adc_buffer_predisable() - now just calls
> > > > iio_triggered_buffer_predisable() if the channel isn't the
> > > > touchscreen
> > > > channel
> > > >
> > > > drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c | 31 +++++++++++++++---------------
> > > > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/at91-
> > > > sama5d2_adc.c
> > > > index a5c7771227d5..f2a74c47c768 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/at91-sama5d2_adc.c
> > > > @@ -873,18 +873,24 @@ static int at91_adc_dma_start(struct iio_dev
> > > > *indio_dev)
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +static bool at91_adc_current_chan_is_touch(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > > > +
> > > > + return !!bitmap_subset(indio_dev->active_scan_mask,
> > > > + &st->touch_st.channels_bitmask,
> > > > + AT91_SAMA5D2_MAX_CHAN_IDX + 1);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > static int at91_adc_buffer_postenable(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> > > > {
> > > > int ret;
> > > > struct at91_adc_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > > >
> > > > /* check if we are enabling triggered buffer or the touchscreen
> > > > */
> > > > - if (bitmap_subset(indio_dev->active_scan_mask,
> > > > - &st->touch_st.channels_bitmask,
> > > > - AT91_SAMA5D2_MAX_CHAN_IDX + 1)) {
> > > > - /* touchscreen enabling */
> > > > + if (at91_adc_current_chan_is_touch(indio_dev))
> > > > return at91_adc_configure_touch(st, true);
> > > > - }
> > > > +
> > > > /* if we are not in triggered mode, we cannot enable the buffer.
> > > > */
> > > > if (!(indio_dev->currentmode & INDIO_ALL_TRIGGERED_MODES))
> > > > return -EINVAL;
> > > > @@ -906,12 +912,9 @@ static int at91_adc_buffer_predisable(struct
> > > > iio_dev *indio_dev)
> > > > u8 bit;
> > > >
> > > > /* check if we are disabling triggered buffer or the touchscreen
> > > > */
> > > > - if (bitmap_subset(indio_dev->active_scan_mask,
> > > > - &st->touch_st.channels_bitmask,
> > > > - AT91_SAMA5D2_MAX_CHAN_IDX + 1)) {
> > > > - /* touchscreen disable */
> > > > + if (at91_adc_current_chan_is_touch(indio_dev))
> > > > return at91_adc_configure_touch(st, false);
> > > > - }
> > > > +
> > > > /* if we are not in triggered mode, nothing to do here */
> > > > if (!(indio_dev->currentmode & INDIO_ALL_TRIGGERED_MODES))
> > > > return -EINVAL;
> > > > @@ -1886,14 +1889,10 @@ static __maybe_unused int at91_adc_resume(struct
> > > > device *dev)
> > > > return 0;
> > > >
> > > > /* check if we are enabling triggered buffer or the touchscreen
> > > > */
> > > > - if (bitmap_subset(indio_dev->active_scan_mask,
> > > > - &st->touch_st.channels_bitmask,
> > > > - AT91_SAMA5D2_MAX_CHAN_IDX + 1)) {
> > > > - /* touchscreen enabling */
> > > > + if (at91_adc_current_chan_is_touch(indio_dev))
> > > > return at91_adc_configure_touch(st, true);
> > > > - } else {
> > > > + else
> > > > return at91_adc_configure_trigger(st->trig, true);
> > > > - }
> > > >
> > > > /* not needed but more explicit */
> > > > return 0;
> > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-15 6:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-04 8:42 [PATCH v2 1/2] iio: at91-sama5d2_adc: split at91_adc_current_chan_is_touch() helper Alexandru Ardelean
2020-03-04 8:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] iio: at91-sama5d2_adc: adjust iio_triggered_buffer_{predisable,postenable} positions Alexandru Ardelean
2020-04-19 10:04 ` ludovic.desroches
2020-04-23 10:56 ` Eugen.Hristev
2020-04-13 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] iio: at91-sama5d2_adc: split at91_adc_current_chan_is_touch() helper Jonathan Cameron
2020-04-14 12:22 ` Eugen.Hristev
2020-04-14 17:45 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-04-15 6:33 ` Ardelean, Alexandru [this message]
2020-04-27 12:20 ` Eugen.Hristev
2020-04-27 13:00 ` Ardelean, Alexandru
2020-04-30 7:30 ` Ardelean, Alexandru
2020-04-30 8:10 ` Ardelean, Alexandru
2020-05-02 17:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-04-15 6:43 ` ludovic.desroches
2020-04-18 17:58 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-04-19 10:09 ` ludovic.desroches
2020-04-25 15:06 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f13b4286c5f133e7461d59965d7f84af059c8e89.camel@analog.com \
--to=alexandru.ardelean@analog.com \
--cc=Eugen.Hristev@microchip.com \
--cc=Ludovic.Desroches@microchip.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox