Re: RFC: more consitent DAC sysfs attributes naming

[Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>]

On 11/19/10 08:33, Hennerich, Michael wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
> 
> I wonder if it would make more sense to use this...
> 
> drivers/staging/iio/dac/dac.h |    4 ++++
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/dac/dac.h b/drivers/staging/iio/dac/dac.h
> index 55005ee..62620ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/dac/dac.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/dac/dac.h
> @@ -2,5 +2,9 @@
>   * dac.h - sysfs attributes associated with DACs
>   */
> 
> +/* Deprecated */
>  #define IIO_DEV_ATTR_DAC(_num, _store, _addr)                  \
>         IIO_DEVICE_ATTR(dac_##_num, S_IWUSR, NULL, _store, _addr)
> +
> +#define IIO_DEV_ATTR_OUT_RAW(_num, _show, _addr)                               \
> +       IIO_DEVICE_ATTR(out##_num##_raw, S_IWUSR, _show, NULL, _addr)
Yes, that seems like the logical equivalent to in0_raw to me.
> 
> 
> Greetings,
> Michael
> 
> --
> Analog Devices GmbH      Wilhelm-Wagenfeld-Str. 6      80807 Muenchen
> Sitz der Gesellschaft Muenchen, Registergericht Muenchen HRB 4036
> Geschaeftsfuehrer Thomas Wessel, William A. Martin, Margaret Seif
> 
>