From: "Nuno Sá" <noname.nuno@gmail.com>
To: Tomas Melin <tomas.melin@vaisala.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@analog.com>, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>,
Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] iio: adc: ad9467: support write/read offset
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2025 13:47:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d343af235c499382bd2eac987357e857865b457.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251202-ad9434-fixes-v2-2-fa73d4eabbea@vaisala.com>
On Tue, 2025-12-02 at 12:53 +0000, Tomas Melin wrote:
> Support configuring output calibration value. Among the devices
> currently supported by this driver, this setting is specific to
> ad9434. The offset can be used to calibrate the output against
> a known input. The register is called offset, but the procedure
> is best mapped internally with calibbias operation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomas Melin <tomas.melin@vaisala.com>
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c
> index 2d8f8da3671dac61994a1864a82cdbef7f54c1af..c3cf7ae977d4279ce5e80a7c956c3844483eb8bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c
> @@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ struct ad9467_chip_info {
> unsigned int num_lanes;
> unsigned int dco_en;
> unsigned int test_points;
> + const int *offset_range;
> /* data clock output */
> bool has_dco;
> bool has_dco_invert;
> @@ -234,6 +235,10 @@ static int ad9467_reg_access(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, unsigned int reg,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static const int ad9434_offset_range[] = {
> + -128, 1, 127,
> +};
> +
> static const unsigned int ad9265_scale_table[][2] = {
> {1250, 0x00}, {1500, 0x40}, {1750, 0x80}, {2000, 0xC0},
> };
> @@ -298,7 +303,24 @@ static void __ad9467_get_scale(struct ad9467_state *st, int index,
> }
>
> static const struct iio_chan_spec ad9434_channels[] = {
> - AD9467_CHAN(0, BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE), 0, 12, 's'),
> + {
> + .type = IIO_VOLTAGE,
> + .indexed = 1,
> + .channel = 0,
> + .info_mask_shared_by_type =
> + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE) |
> + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ) |
> + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBBIAS),
> + .info_mask_shared_by_type_available =
> + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE) |
> + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_CALIBBIAS),
Odd style for info_mask_shared_by_type_available and info_mask_shared_by_type. Seems we have
more line breaks than needed.
> + .scan_index = 0,
> + .scan_type = {
> + .sign = 's',
> + .realbits = 12,
> + .storagebits = 16,
> + },
> + },
> };
>
> static const struct iio_chan_spec ad9467_channels[] = {
> @@ -367,6 +389,7 @@ static const struct ad9467_chip_info ad9434_chip_tbl = {
> .default_output_mode = AD9434_DEF_OUTPUT_MODE,
> .vref_mask = AD9434_REG_VREF_MASK,
> .num_lanes = 6,
> + .offset_range = ad9434_offset_range,
> };
>
> static const struct ad9467_chip_info ad9265_chip_tbl = {
> @@ -499,6 +522,33 @@ static int ad9467_set_scale(struct ad9467_state *st, int val, int val2)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> +static int ad9467_get_offset(struct ad9467_state *st, int *val)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = ad9467_spi_read(st, AN877_ADC_REG_OFFSET);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + *val = ret;
> +
> + return IIO_VAL_INT;
> +}
> +
> +static int ad9467_set_offset(struct ad9467_state *st, int val)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (val < st->info->offset_range[0] || val > st->info->offset_range[2])
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = ad9467_spi_write(st, AN877_ADC_REG_OFFSET, val);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + /* Sync registers */
I think this is not what David meant by adding a comment. IMHO, the comment as-is does not
bring any added value.
- Nuno Sá
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-02 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-02 12:53 [PATCH v2 0/2] iio: adc: ad9467: fixes for ad9434 Tomas Melin
2025-12-02 12:53 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] iio: adc: ad9467: fix ad9434 vref mask Tomas Melin
2025-12-02 13:51 ` Nuno Sá
2025-12-02 14:11 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-12-02 12:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] iio: adc: ad9467: support write/read offset Tomas Melin
2025-12-02 13:47 ` Nuno Sá [this message]
2025-12-02 14:52 ` Tomas Melin
2025-12-02 15:05 ` Nuno Sá
2025-12-02 15:28 ` David Lechner
2025-12-03 5:38 ` Tomas Melin
2025-12-02 14:11 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-12-02 15:01 ` Tomas Melin
2025-12-02 16:08 ` Nuno Sá
2025-12-02 18:02 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-12-03 7:28 ` Tomas Melin
2025-12-03 9:04 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-12-07 13:04 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-12-02 16:29 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] iio: adc: ad9467: fixes for ad9434 David Lechner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5d343af235c499382bd2eac987357e857865b457.camel@gmail.com \
--to=noname.nuno@gmail.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=alexandru.ardelean@analog.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=tomas.melin@vaisala.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox