* [PATCH v3] iio: sx9324: avoid copying property strings
@ 2023-12-12 0:42 Justin Stitt
2023-12-12 6:30 ` Joe Perches
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Justin Stitt @ 2023-12-12 0:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Cameron, Lars-Peter Clausen
Cc: Stephen Boyd, linux-iio, linux-kernel, linux-hardening,
Justin Stitt
We're doing some needless string copies when trying to assign the proper
`prop` string. We can make `prop` a const char* and simply assign to
string literals.
For the case where a format string is used, let's extract the parsing
logic out into sx9324_parse_phase_prop(). We no longer need to create
copies or allocate new memory.
sx9324_parse_phase_prop() will simply return the default def value if it
fails.
This also cleans up some deprecated strncpy() uses [1].
Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strncpy-on-nul-terminated-strings [1]
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/90
Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
---
Changes in v3:
- extract logic into sx9324_parse_phase_prop() and use string literals
(thanks Stephen)
- rebase onto mainline bee0e7762ad2c602
- Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231026-strncpy-drivers-iio-proximity-sx9324-c-v2-1-cee6e5db700c@google.com
Changes in v2:
- make prop a const char* and do simple assignments (thanks Jonathan)
- rebase onto 3a568e3a961ba330
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230921-strncpy-drivers-iio-proximity-sx9324-c-v1-1-4e8d28fd1e7c@google.com
---
---
drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c b/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c
index 438f9c9aba6e..e3bc30b57b19 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c
@@ -873,6 +873,32 @@ static int sx9324_init_compensation(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
20000, 2000000);
}
+static u32 sx9324_parse_phase_prop(struct device *dev,
+ struct sx_common_reg_default *reg_def,
+ int idx, const char *prop)
+{
+ unsigned int pin_defs[SX9324_NUM_PINS];
+ int count, ret, pin;
+ u8 default_def;
+ u32 raw = 0;
+
+ default_def = sx9324_default_regs[idx].def;
+
+ count = device_property_count_u32(dev, prop);
+ if (count != ARRAY_SIZE(pin_defs))
+ return default_def;
+ ret = device_property_read_u32_array(dev, prop, pin_defs,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(pin_defs));
+ if (ret)
+ return default_def;
+
+ for (pin = 0; pin < SX9324_NUM_PINS; pin++)
+ raw |= (pin_defs[pin] << (2 * pin)) &
+ SX9324_REG_AFE_PH0_PIN_MASK(pin);
+
+ return raw;
+}
+
static const struct sx_common_reg_default *
sx9324_get_default_reg(struct device *dev, int idx,
struct sx_common_reg_default *reg_def)
@@ -884,35 +910,30 @@ sx9324_get_default_reg(struct device *dev, int idx,
#define SX9324_PIN_DEF "semtech,ph0-pin"
#define SX9324_RESOLUTION_DEF "semtech,ph01-resolution"
#define SX9324_PROXRAW_DEF "semtech,ph01-proxraw-strength"
- unsigned int pin_defs[SX9324_NUM_PINS];
- char prop[] = SX9324_PROXRAW_DEF;
+ const char *prop = SX9324_PROXRAW_DEF;
u32 start = 0, raw = 0, pos = 0;
- int ret, count, ph, pin;
const char *res;
+ int ret;
memcpy(reg_def, &sx9324_default_regs[idx], sizeof(*reg_def));
sx_common_get_raw_register_config(dev, reg_def);
switch (reg_def->reg) {
case SX9324_REG_AFE_PH0:
+ reg_def->def = sx9324_parse_phase_prop(dev, reg_def, idx,
+ "semtech,ph0-pin");
+ break;
case SX9324_REG_AFE_PH1:
+ reg_def->def = sx9324_parse_phase_prop(dev, reg_def, idx,
+ "semtech,ph1-pin");
+ break;
case SX9324_REG_AFE_PH2:
+ reg_def->def = sx9324_parse_phase_prop(dev, reg_def, idx,
+ "semtech,ph2-pin");
+ break;
case SX9324_REG_AFE_PH3:
- ph = reg_def->reg - SX9324_REG_AFE_PH0;
- snprintf(prop, ARRAY_SIZE(prop), "semtech,ph%d-pin", ph);
-
- count = device_property_count_u32(dev, prop);
- if (count != ARRAY_SIZE(pin_defs))
- break;
- ret = device_property_read_u32_array(dev, prop, pin_defs,
- ARRAY_SIZE(pin_defs));
- if (ret)
- break;
-
- for (pin = 0; pin < SX9324_NUM_PINS; pin++)
- raw |= (pin_defs[pin] << (2 * pin)) &
- SX9324_REG_AFE_PH0_PIN_MASK(pin);
- reg_def->def = raw;
+ reg_def->def = sx9324_parse_phase_prop(dev, reg_def, idx,
+ "semtech,ph3-pin");
break;
case SX9324_REG_AFE_CTRL0:
ret = device_property_read_string(dev,
@@ -937,11 +958,9 @@ sx9324_get_default_reg(struct device *dev, int idx,
case SX9324_REG_AFE_CTRL4:
case SX9324_REG_AFE_CTRL7:
if (reg_def->reg == SX9324_REG_AFE_CTRL4)
- strncpy(prop, "semtech,ph01-resolution",
- ARRAY_SIZE(prop));
+ prop = "semtech,ph01-resolution";
else
- strncpy(prop, "semtech,ph23-resolution",
- ARRAY_SIZE(prop));
+ prop = "semtech,ph23-resolution";
ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, prop, &raw);
if (ret)
@@ -1012,11 +1031,9 @@ sx9324_get_default_reg(struct device *dev, int idx,
case SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0:
case SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL1:
if (reg_def->reg == SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0)
- strncpy(prop, "semtech,ph01-proxraw-strength",
- ARRAY_SIZE(prop));
+ prop = "semtech,ph01-proxraw-strength";
else
- strncpy(prop, "semtech,ph23-proxraw-strength",
- ARRAY_SIZE(prop));
+ prop = "semtech,ph23-proxraw-strength";
ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, prop, &raw);
if (ret)
break;
---
base-commit: bee0e7762ad2c6025b9f5245c040fcc36ef2bde8
change-id: 20230921-strncpy-drivers-iio-proximity-sx9324-c-8c3437676039
Best regards,
--
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v3] iio: sx9324: avoid copying property strings 2023-12-12 0:42 [PATCH v3] iio: sx9324: avoid copying property strings Justin Stitt @ 2023-12-12 6:30 ` Joe Perches 2023-12-17 13:24 ` Jonathan Cameron 2023-12-12 21:26 ` Kees Cook 2023-12-14 0:59 ` Stephen Boyd 2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Joe Perches @ 2023-12-12 6:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Justin Stitt, Jonathan Cameron, Lars-Peter Clausen Cc: Stephen Boyd, linux-iio, linux-kernel, linux-hardening On Tue, 2023-12-12 at 00:42 +0000, Justin Stitt wrote: > We're doing some needless string copies when trying to assign the proper > `prop` string. We can make `prop` a const char* and simply assign to > string literals. trivia: I would have updated it like this moving the various declarations into the case blocks where they are used and removing a few unused #defines --- drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c b/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c index ac2ed2da21ccc..c50c1108a69cc 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c +++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c @@ -877,17 +877,8 @@ static const struct sx_common_reg_default * sx9324_get_default_reg(struct device *dev, int idx, struct sx_common_reg_default *reg_def) { - static const char * const sx9324_rints[] = { "lowest", "low", "high", - "highest" }; - static const char * const sx9324_csidle[] = { "hi-z", "hi-z", "gnd", - "vdd" }; -#define SX9324_PIN_DEF "semtech,ph0-pin" -#define SX9324_RESOLUTION_DEF "semtech,ph01-resolution" -#define SX9324_PROXRAW_DEF "semtech,ph01-proxraw-strength" - unsigned int pin_defs[SX9324_NUM_PINS]; - char prop[] = SX9324_PROXRAW_DEF; - u32 start = 0, raw = 0, pos = 0; - int ret, count, ph, pin; + u32 raw = 0; + int ret; memcpy(reg_def, &sx9324_default_regs[idx], sizeof(*reg_def)); @@ -896,7 +887,13 @@ sx9324_get_default_reg(struct device *dev, int idx, case SX9324_REG_AFE_PH0: case SX9324_REG_AFE_PH1: case SX9324_REG_AFE_PH2: - case SX9324_REG_AFE_PH3: + case SX9324_REG_AFE_PH3: { + unsigned int pin_defs[SX9324_NUM_PINS]; + int count; + int pin; + int ph; + char prop[32]; + ph = reg_def->reg - SX9324_REG_AFE_PH0; snprintf(prop, ARRAY_SIZE(prop), "semtech,ph%d-pin", ph); @@ -913,7 +910,15 @@ sx9324_get_default_reg(struct device *dev, int idx, SX9324_REG_AFE_PH0_PIN_MASK(pin); reg_def->def = raw; break; - case SX9324_REG_AFE_CTRL0: + } + case SX9324_REG_AFE_CTRL0: { + static const char * const sx9324_csidle[] = { + "hi-z", "hi-z", "gnd", "vdd" + }; + static const char * const sx9324_rints[] = { + "lowest", "low", "high", "highest" + }; + ret = device_property_match_property_string(dev, "semtech,cs-idle-sleep", sx9324_csidle, ARRAY_SIZE(sx9324_csidle)); @@ -930,16 +935,17 @@ sx9324_get_default_reg(struct device *dev, int idx, reg_def->def |= ret << SX9324_REG_AFE_CTRL0_RINT_SHIFT; } break; + } case SX9324_REG_AFE_CTRL4: - case SX9324_REG_AFE_CTRL7: + case SX9324_REG_AFE_CTRL7: { + const char *type; + if (reg_def->reg == SX9324_REG_AFE_CTRL4) - strncpy(prop, "semtech,ph01-resolution", - ARRAY_SIZE(prop)); + type = "semtech,ph01-resolution"; else - strncpy(prop, "semtech,ph23-resolution", - ARRAY_SIZE(prop)); + type = "semtech,ph23-resolution"; - ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, prop, &raw); + ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, type, &raw); if (ret) break; @@ -949,6 +955,7 @@ sx9324_get_default_reg(struct device *dev, int idx, reg_def->def |= FIELD_PREP(SX9324_REG_AFE_CTRL4_RESOLUTION_MASK, raw); break; + } case SX9324_REG_AFE_CTRL8: ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "semtech,input-precharge-resistor-ohms", @@ -982,17 +989,21 @@ sx9324_get_default_reg(struct device *dev, int idx, 6 + raw * (raw + 3) / 2); break; - case SX9324_REG_ADV_CTRL5: + case SX9324_REG_ADV_CTRL5: { + u32 start = 0; + ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "semtech,startup-sensor", &start); if (ret) break; - reg_def->def &= ~SX9324_REG_ADV_CTRL5_STARTUPSENS_MASK; reg_def->def |= FIELD_PREP(SX9324_REG_ADV_CTRL5_STARTUPSENS_MASK, start); break; - case SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL4: + } + case SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL4: { + u32 pos = 0; + ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "semtech,avg-pos-strength", &pos); if (ret) @@ -1005,15 +1016,16 @@ sx9324_get_default_reg(struct device *dev, int idx, reg_def->def |= FIELD_PREP(SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL4_AVGPOSFILT_MASK, raw); break; + } case SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0: - case SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL1: + case SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL1: { + const char *type; + if (reg_def->reg == SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0) - strncpy(prop, "semtech,ph01-proxraw-strength", - ARRAY_SIZE(prop)); + type = "semtech,ph01-proxraw-strength"; else - strncpy(prop, "semtech,ph23-proxraw-strength", - ARRAY_SIZE(prop)); - ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, prop, &raw); + type = "semtech,ph23-proxraw-strength"; + ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, type, &raw); if (ret) break; @@ -1022,6 +1034,7 @@ sx9324_get_default_reg(struct device *dev, int idx, raw); break; } + } return reg_def; } ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] iio: sx9324: avoid copying property strings 2023-12-12 6:30 ` Joe Perches @ 2023-12-17 13:24 ` Jonathan Cameron 2023-12-17 13:41 ` Joe Perches 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2023-12-17 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joe Perches Cc: Justin Stitt, Lars-Peter Clausen, Stephen Boyd, linux-iio, linux-kernel, linux-hardening On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 22:30:12 -0800 Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2023-12-12 at 00:42 +0000, Justin Stitt wrote: > > We're doing some needless string copies when trying to assign the proper > > `prop` string. We can make `prop` a const char* and simply assign to > > string literals. > > trivia: > > I would have updated it like this moving the > various declarations into the case blocks > where they are used and removing a few unused > #defines I'd definitely like to see those defines gone. Arguably an unrelated change as I guess they are left from a previous refactor of this code. Why prop to type renaming? It's getting passed into calls where the parameter is propname so I'd understand renaming to that, but type just seems a bit random to me. I do wonder if we are better off having some long lines and getting rid of the property naming local variables completely by just duplicating the device_property_read_u32() call and passing them in directly. Moving declarations more locally is a nice to have but I'll leave that up to Justin. Anyhow, both solutions look much better than the original so I'm fine either way (subject to responses to Stephen's review) > > --- > drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- > 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c b/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c > index ac2ed2da21ccc..c50c1108a69cc 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c > @@ -877,17 +877,8 @@ static const struct sx_common_reg_default * > sx9324_get_default_reg(struct device *dev, int idx, > struct sx_common_reg_default *reg_def) > { > - static const char * const sx9324_rints[] = { "lowest", "low", "high", > - "highest" }; > - static const char * const sx9324_csidle[] = { "hi-z", "hi-z", "gnd", > - "vdd" }; > -#define SX9324_PIN_DEF "semtech,ph0-pin" > -#define SX9324_RESOLUTION_DEF "semtech,ph01-resolution" > -#define SX9324_PROXRAW_DEF "semtech,ph01-proxraw-strength" > - unsigned int pin_defs[SX9324_NUM_PINS]; > - char prop[] = SX9324_PROXRAW_DEF; > - u32 start = 0, raw = 0, pos = 0; > - int ret, count, ph, pin; > + u32 raw = 0; > + int ret; > > memcpy(reg_def, &sx9324_default_regs[idx], sizeof(*reg_def)); > > @@ -896,7 +887,13 @@ sx9324_get_default_reg(struct device *dev, int idx, > case SX9324_REG_AFE_PH0: > case SX9324_REG_AFE_PH1: > case SX9324_REG_AFE_PH2: > - case SX9324_REG_AFE_PH3: > + case SX9324_REG_AFE_PH3: { > + unsigned int pin_defs[SX9324_NUM_PINS]; > + int count; > + int pin; > + int ph; > + char prop[32]; > + > ph = reg_def->reg - SX9324_REG_AFE_PH0; > snprintf(prop, ARRAY_SIZE(prop), "semtech,ph%d-pin", ph); > > @@ -913,7 +910,15 @@ sx9324_get_default_reg(struct device *dev, int idx, > SX9324_REG_AFE_PH0_PIN_MASK(pin); > reg_def->def = raw; > break; > - case SX9324_REG_AFE_CTRL0: > + } > + case SX9324_REG_AFE_CTRL0: { > + static const char * const sx9324_csidle[] = { > + "hi-z", "hi-z", "gnd", "vdd" > + }; > + static const char * const sx9324_rints[] = { > + "lowest", "low", "high", "highest" > + }; > + > ret = device_property_match_property_string(dev, "semtech,cs-idle-sleep", > sx9324_csidle, > ARRAY_SIZE(sx9324_csidle)); > @@ -930,16 +935,17 @@ sx9324_get_default_reg(struct device *dev, int idx, > reg_def->def |= ret << SX9324_REG_AFE_CTRL0_RINT_SHIFT; > } > break; > + } > case SX9324_REG_AFE_CTRL4: > - case SX9324_REG_AFE_CTRL7: > + case SX9324_REG_AFE_CTRL7: { > + const char *type; > + > if (reg_def->reg == SX9324_REG_AFE_CTRL4) > - strncpy(prop, "semtech,ph01-resolution", > - ARRAY_SIZE(prop)); > + type = "semtech,ph01-resolution"; > else > - strncpy(prop, "semtech,ph23-resolution", > - ARRAY_SIZE(prop)); > + type = "semtech,ph23-resolution"; > > - ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, prop, &raw); > + ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, type, &raw); > if (ret) > break; > > @@ -949,6 +955,7 @@ sx9324_get_default_reg(struct device *dev, int idx, > reg_def->def |= FIELD_PREP(SX9324_REG_AFE_CTRL4_RESOLUTION_MASK, > raw); > break; > + } > case SX9324_REG_AFE_CTRL8: > ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, > "semtech,input-precharge-resistor-ohms", > @@ -982,17 +989,21 @@ sx9324_get_default_reg(struct device *dev, int idx, > 6 + raw * (raw + 3) / 2); > break; > > - case SX9324_REG_ADV_CTRL5: > + case SX9324_REG_ADV_CTRL5: { > + u32 start = 0; > + > ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "semtech,startup-sensor", > &start); > if (ret) > break; > - > reg_def->def &= ~SX9324_REG_ADV_CTRL5_STARTUPSENS_MASK; > reg_def->def |= FIELD_PREP(SX9324_REG_ADV_CTRL5_STARTUPSENS_MASK, > start); > break; > - case SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL4: > + } > + case SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL4: { > + u32 pos = 0; > + > ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "semtech,avg-pos-strength", > &pos); > if (ret) > @@ -1005,15 +1016,16 @@ sx9324_get_default_reg(struct device *dev, int idx, > reg_def->def |= FIELD_PREP(SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL4_AVGPOSFILT_MASK, > raw); > break; > + } > case SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0: > - case SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL1: > + case SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL1: { > + const char *type; > + > if (reg_def->reg == SX9324_REG_PROX_CTRL0) > - strncpy(prop, "semtech,ph01-proxraw-strength", > - ARRAY_SIZE(prop)); > + type = "semtech,ph01-proxraw-strength"; > else > - strncpy(prop, "semtech,ph23-proxraw-strength", > - ARRAY_SIZE(prop)); > - ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, prop, &raw); > + type = "semtech,ph23-proxraw-strength"; > + ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, type, &raw); > if (ret) > break; > > @@ -1022,6 +1034,7 @@ sx9324_get_default_reg(struct device *dev, int idx, > raw); > break; > } > + } > return reg_def; > } > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] iio: sx9324: avoid copying property strings 2023-12-17 13:24 ` Jonathan Cameron @ 2023-12-17 13:41 ` Joe Perches 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Joe Perches @ 2023-12-17 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: Justin Stitt, Lars-Peter Clausen, Stephen Boyd, linux-iio, linux-kernel, linux-hardening On Sun, 2023-12-17 at 13:24 +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 22:30:12 -0800 > Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2023-12-12 at 00:42 +0000, Justin Stitt wrote: > > > We're doing some needless string copies when trying to assign the proper > > > `prop` string. We can make `prop` a const char* and simply assign to > > > string literals. > > > > trivia: > > > > I would have updated it like this moving the > > various declarations into the case blocks > > where they are used and removing a few unused > > #defines > > I'd definitely like to see those defines gone. > Arguably an unrelated change as I guess they are left from a previous refactor > of this code. > > Why prop to type renaming? random, no specific need, though I prefer not reusing identifiers with different types in separate local scopes. > It's getting passed into calls where the parameter > is propname so I'd understand renaming to that, but type just seems a bit random > to me. I do wonder if we are better off having some long lines and getting rid > of the property naming local variables completely by just duplicating > the device_property_read_u32() call and passing them in directly. maybe, give it a try and see what you think. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] iio: sx9324: avoid copying property strings 2023-12-12 0:42 [PATCH v3] iio: sx9324: avoid copying property strings Justin Stitt 2023-12-12 6:30 ` Joe Perches @ 2023-12-12 21:26 ` Kees Cook 2023-12-14 0:59 ` Stephen Boyd 2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Kees Cook @ 2023-12-12 21:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Justin Stitt Cc: Jonathan Cameron, Lars-Peter Clausen, Stephen Boyd, linux-iio, linux-kernel, linux-hardening On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 12:42:52AM +0000, Justin Stitt wrote: > We're doing some needless string copies when trying to assign the proper > `prop` string. We can make `prop` a const char* and simply assign to > string literals. > > For the case where a format string is used, let's extract the parsing > logic out into sx9324_parse_phase_prop(). We no longer need to create > copies or allocate new memory. > > sx9324_parse_phase_prop() will simply return the default def value if it > fails. > > This also cleans up some deprecated strncpy() uses [1]. > > Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strncpy-on-nul-terminated-strings [1] > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/90 > Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Yeah, I like this approach. Totally removes the string copying and creates a helper that does the "heavy lifting". :) Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> -- Kees Cook ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] iio: sx9324: avoid copying property strings 2023-12-12 0:42 [PATCH v3] iio: sx9324: avoid copying property strings Justin Stitt 2023-12-12 6:30 ` Joe Perches 2023-12-12 21:26 ` Kees Cook @ 2023-12-14 0:59 ` Stephen Boyd 2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Stephen Boyd @ 2023-12-14 0:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jonathan Cameron, Justin Stitt, Lars-Peter Clausen Cc: linux-iio, linux-kernel, linux-hardening Quoting Justin Stitt (2023-12-11 16:42:52) > diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c b/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c > index 438f9c9aba6e..e3bc30b57b19 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c > @@ -873,6 +873,32 @@ static int sx9324_init_compensation(struct iio_dev *indio_dev) > 20000, 2000000); > } > > +static u32 sx9324_parse_phase_prop(struct device *dev, return u8? because that's the type of struct sx_common_reg_default::def. > + struct sx_common_reg_default *reg_def, > + int idx, const char *prop) > +{ > + unsigned int pin_defs[SX9324_NUM_PINS]; > + int count, ret, pin; > + u8 default_def; > + u32 raw = 0; > + > + default_def = sx9324_default_regs[idx].def; Do we need to do this? Isn't this reg_def->def? > + > + count = device_property_count_u32(dev, prop); > + if (count != ARRAY_SIZE(pin_defs)) > + return default_def; return reg_def->def? > + ret = device_property_read_u32_array(dev, prop, pin_defs, > + ARRAY_SIZE(pin_defs)); > + if (ret) > + return default_def; return reg_def->def? > + > + for (pin = 0; pin < SX9324_NUM_PINS; pin++) > + raw |= (pin_defs[pin] << (2 * pin)) & > + SX9324_REG_AFE_PH0_PIN_MASK(pin); > + > + return raw; > +} > + > static const struct sx_common_reg_default * > sx9324_get_default_reg(struct device *dev, int idx, > struct sx_common_reg_default *reg_def) > @@ -884,35 +910,30 @@ sx9324_get_default_reg(struct device *dev, int idx, > #define SX9324_PIN_DEF "semtech,ph0-pin" > #define SX9324_RESOLUTION_DEF "semtech,ph01-resolution" > #define SX9324_PROXRAW_DEF "semtech,ph01-proxraw-strength" Can you send a followup to remove these defines? > - unsigned int pin_defs[SX9324_NUM_PINS]; > - char prop[] = SX9324_PROXRAW_DEF; > + const char *prop = SX9324_PROXRAW_DEF; This can be left unassigned now, right? > u32 start = 0, raw = 0, pos = 0; > - int ret, count, ph, pin; > const char *res; > + int ret; ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-12-17 13:41 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2023-12-12 0:42 [PATCH v3] iio: sx9324: avoid copying property strings Justin Stitt 2023-12-12 6:30 ` Joe Perches 2023-12-17 13:24 ` Jonathan Cameron 2023-12-17 13:41 ` Joe Perches 2023-12-12 21:26 ` Kees Cook 2023-12-14 0:59 ` Stephen Boyd
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox