* [PATCH] iio: light: veml6070: Fix resource leak in probe error path
@ 2026-03-26 12:11 Felix Gu
2026-03-26 18:40 ` Andy Shevchenko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Felix Gu @ 2026-03-26 12:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Cameron, David Lechner, Nuno Sá, Andy Shevchenko,
Javier Carrasco
Cc: Jonathan Cameron, linux-iio, linux-kernel, Felix Gu
The original code registered the i2c dummy device cleanup via
devm_add_action_or_reset() after i2c_new_dummy_device(). If probe
failed between these two calls, the dummy device would leak.
Use devm_i2c_new_dummy_device() which registers cleanup atomically
with device creation, eliminating the error-path window.
Fixes: 7501bff87c3e ("iio: light: veml6070: add action for i2c_unregister_device")
Signed-off-by: Felix Gu <ustc.gu@gmail.com>
---
drivers/iio/light/veml6070.c | 14 ++------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/veml6070.c b/drivers/iio/light/veml6070.c
index 6d4483c85f30..416a9520713f 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/light/veml6070.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/light/veml6070.c
@@ -247,13 +247,6 @@ static const struct iio_info veml6070_info = {
.write_raw = veml6070_write_raw,
};
-static void veml6070_i2c_unreg(void *p)
-{
- struct veml6070_data *data = p;
-
- i2c_unregister_device(data->client2);
-}
-
static int veml6070_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
{
struct veml6070_data *data;
@@ -283,7 +276,8 @@ static int veml6070_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
- data->client2 = i2c_new_dummy_device(client->adapter, VEML6070_ADDR_DATA_LSB);
+ data->client2 = devm_i2c_new_dummy_device(&client->dev, client->adapter,
+ VEML6070_ADDR_DATA_LSB);
if (IS_ERR(data->client2))
return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, PTR_ERR(data->client2),
"i2c device for second chip address failed\n");
@@ -294,10 +288,6 @@ static int veml6070_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
- ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&client->dev, veml6070_i2c_unreg, data);
- if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
-
return devm_iio_device_register(&client->dev, indio_dev);
}
---
base-commit: 66ba480978ce390e631e870b740a3406e3eb6b01
change-id: 20260326-veml6070-1489798087df
Best regards,
--
Felix Gu <ustc.gu@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] iio: light: veml6070: Fix resource leak in probe error path
2026-03-26 12:11 [PATCH] iio: light: veml6070: Fix resource leak in probe error path Felix Gu
@ 2026-03-26 18:40 ` Andy Shevchenko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2026-03-26 18:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Felix Gu
Cc: Jonathan Cameron, David Lechner, Nuno Sá, Andy Shevchenko,
Javier Carrasco, Jonathan Cameron, linux-iio, linux-kernel
On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 at 08:11:42PM +0800, Felix Gu wrote:
> The original code registered the i2c dummy device cleanup via
> devm_add_action_or_reset() after i2c_new_dummy_device(). If probe
> failed between these two calls, the dummy device would leak.
I see what you meant by reading the code, but the above is simply wrong.
The
ret = i2c_new_dummy_device();
if (ret)
return ret; // "probe failed between these two calls"
ret = devm_add_action_or_reset();
Please, rephrase.
> Use devm_i2c_new_dummy_device() which registers cleanup atomically
> with device creation, eliminating the error-path window.
With the fixed commit message
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-26 18:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-03-26 12:11 [PATCH] iio: light: veml6070: Fix resource leak in probe error path Felix Gu
2026-03-26 18:40 ` Andy Shevchenko
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox