From: "Nuno Sá" <noname.nuno@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>,
nuno.sa@analog.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: buffer-dmaengine: Add support for cyclic DMA transfers
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:43:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <al4kJW8nDllWrBBB@nsa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260719030346.6fb9670e@jic23-huawei>
On Sun, Jul 19, 2026 at 03:03:46AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jul 2026 03:00:57 +0100
> Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 15 Jul 2026 19:09:42 +0300
> > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 05:13:32PM +0200, Nuno Sá wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 05:23:13PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 01:24:53PM +0200, Nuno Sá via B4 Relay wrote:
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > > > > static int iio_dmaengine_buffer_submit_block(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue,
> > > > > > struct iio_dma_buffer_block *block)
> > > > >
> > > > > > + if (block->cyclic)
> > > > > > + flags = DMA_PREP_REPEAT;
> > > > > > + else
> > > > > > + flags = DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > + * A new transfer may need to end an already active cyclic transfer
> > > > > > + * before it can run, so always set the EOT flag.
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > > desc = dmaengine_prep_peripheral_dma_vec(dmaengine_buffer->chan,
> > > > > > vecs, nents, dma_dir,
> > > > > > - DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT);
> > > > > > + flags | DMA_PREP_LOAD_EOT);
> > > > >
> > > > > Logically I would expect this to be a separate line with the above comment.
> > > >
> > > > Hmm I can agree to some extent. I guess it makes sense, yes. OTOH, it´s close
> > > > enough to be clear what's happening.
> > >
> > > Close, but not enough in my opinion. This currently is spread over pure flags
> > > manipulation and API calls.
> > >
> > > > Anyways, can spin v3 if you feel
> > > > strong about it (will anyways wait for Jonathan to take a look to make
> > > > sure this the only pending concern).
> > >
> > > Not so strong, but lean towards my version. Let's wait for his review and
> > > decide if it will be tweaked whilst applying or next version.
> > >
> > Applied with this tweak. Hopefully I didn't mess it up!
>
> I'll leave it on tree for now but I forgot to check sashiko and
> it asks about plausible sounding races. Please take a look and
> let me know if they are real and an update is needed:
> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260715-iio-dma-cyclic-v2-1-268a3a28ff84%40analog.com
"
Does this check allow a non-cyclic transfer to be submitted while a cyclic
transfer is already active?
Since block->cyclic is false for a non-cyclic transfer, this safety check
is bypassed."
The above is the whole point of DMA_PREP_LOAD_EOT (so we can gracefully
"terminate" a cyclic transfer)
I now see that our current cap will never allow for a new cyclic to be
submitted (unless we disable + enable the buffer) but I would keep things simple
for now (it was also the whole point of having a cyclic cap in the first
place).
"If a non-cyclic file I/O transfer is submitted instead, it lacks the
DMA_PREP_LOAD_EOT flag, which could cause it to hang forever while the DMA
engine continuously repeats the preceding cyclic transfer."
Not sure where AI got the above from. The DMA_PREP_LOAD_EOT is always
set (even for the file IO based approach).
So unless I'm missing nothing, I think we are fine.
- Nuno Sá
>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dmaengine.c b/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dmaengine.c
> > index 639bac135539..ecc02a427b92 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dmaengine.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/buffer/industrialio-buffer-dmaengine.c
> > @@ -132,9 +132,10 @@ static int iio_dmaengine_buffer_submit_block(struct iio_dma_buffer_queue *queue,
> > * A new transfer may need to end an already active cyclic transfer
> > * before it can run, so always set the EOT flag.
> > */
> > + flags |= DMA_PREP_LOAD_EOT;
> > desc = dmaengine_prep_peripheral_dma_vec(dmaengine_buffer->chan,
> > vecs, nents, dma_dir,
> > - flags | DMA_PREP_LOAD_EOT);
> > + flags);
> > kfree(vecs);
> > } else {
> > max_size = min(block->size, dmaengine_buffer->max_size);
> >
> > > > > /*
> > > > > * ...comment...
> > > > > */
> > > > > flags |= DMA_PREP_LOAD_EOT;
> > > > > ...
> > > > > flags);
> > > > >
> > > > > > kfree(vecs);
> > >
> >
> >
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-20 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-15 11:24 [PATCH v2] iio: buffer-dmaengine: Add support for cyclic DMA transfers Nuno Sá via B4 Relay
2026-07-15 14:23 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-07-15 15:13 ` Nuno Sá
2026-07-15 16:09 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-07-19 2:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-07-19 2:03 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-07-20 13:43 ` Nuno Sá [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=al4kJW8nDllWrBBB@nsa \
--to=noname.nuno@gmail.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox