Linux Input/HID development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Zhengping Jiang <jiangzp@google.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
	Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
	Archie Pusaka <apusaka@google.com>,
	Shashikirana H K <shashikiranah@chromium.org>,
	linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] HID: vivaldi: avoid redundant feature report reads per usage
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 22:32:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01c8cf7d695261ba8270ff57aa8f2a6f@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261013192318.1828453-1-jiangzp@google.com>

Hi Zhengping,

On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 07:23:18PM +0000, Zhengping Jiang wrote:
> vivaldi_feature_mapping() is invoked by hidinput_configure_usages() in
> ascending usage_index order for each usage in the top-row physical keymap
> field. Because fetching the feature report at usage_index == 0 already
> reads the entire report from hardware and populates field->value[] for all
> usages in the field, calling hid_hw_raw_request() again for subsequent
> usages redundantly reads the same report N times (e.g., 12 sequential BLE
> GATT reads taking ~2s on Vivaldi BLE keyboards).

A minor note on the commit description: drv->feature_mapping() is invoked
by report_features(), not hidinput_configure_usages().

> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-vivaldi-common.c b/drivers/hid/hid-vivaldi-common.c
> index c3c9fe9e697b..2d85555289d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-vivaldi-common.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-vivaldi-common.c
> @@ -33,21 +33,22 @@ void vivaldi_feature_mapping(struct hid_device *hdev,
>  {
>  	struct vivaldi_data *data = hid_get_drvdata(hdev);
>  	struct hid_report *report = field->report;
> -	u8 *report_data, *buf;
> +	u8 *report_data, *buf = NULL;
>  	u32 report_len;
>  	unsigned int fn_key;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	if (field->logical != HID_USAGE_FN_ROW_PHYSMAP ||
> -	    (usage->hid & HID_USAGE_PAGE) != HID_UP_ORDINAL)
> +	if (field->logical != HID_USAGE_FN_ROW_PHYSMAP)
>  		return;
>  
> -	fn_key = usage->hid & HID_USAGE;
> -	if (fn_key < MIN_FN_ROW_KEY || fn_key > MAX_FN_ROW_KEY)
> -		return;
> -
> -	if (fn_key > data->num_function_row_keys)
> -		data->num_function_row_keys = fn_key;
> +	/*
> +	 * Read the feature report only at usage_index == 0, as a single read
> +	 * populates field->value[] for all usages in the field. If the read
> +	 * fails, subsequent usages will not re-read the report and will rely
> +	 * on field->value[] being zero-initialized.
> +	 */
> +	if (usage->usage_index)
> +		goto parse_usage;
>  
>  	report_data = buf = hid_alloc_report_buf(report, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!report_data)
> @@ -72,7 +73,7 @@ void vivaldi_feature_mapping(struct hid_device *hdev,
>  	if (ret < 0) {
>  		dev_warn(&hdev->dev, "failed to fetch feature %d\n",
>  			 field->report->id);
> -		goto out;
> +		goto parse_usage;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!report->id) {
> @@ -86,11 +87,20 @@ void vivaldi_feature_mapping(struct hid_device *hdev,
>  
>  	ret = __hid_report_raw_event(hdev, HID_FEATURE_REPORT, report_data,
>  				     report_len, report_len, 0);

It looks like this patch was generated against a downstream ChromeOS
tree (__hid_report_raw_event() does not exist upstream; mainline uses
hid_report_raw_event()), so it does not apply cleanly.

> -	if (ret) {
> +	if (ret)
>  		dev_warn(&hdev->dev, "failed to report feature %d\n",
>  			 field->report->id);
> +
> +parse_usage:
> +	if ((usage->hid & HID_USAGE_PAGE) != HID_UP_ORDINAL)
>  		goto out;
> -	}
> +
> +	fn_key = usage->hid & HID_USAGE;
> +	if (fn_key < MIN_FN_ROW_KEY || fn_key > MAX_FN_ROW_KEY)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	if (fn_key > data->num_function_row_keys)
> +		data->num_function_row_keys = fn_key;
>  
>  	data->function_row_physmap[fn_key - MIN_FN_ROW_KEY] =
>  		field->value[usage->usage_index];

If reading or parsing the feature report fails, we should not be
updating data->num_function_row_keys or populating
data->function_row_physmap[] with zeros: vivaldi_is_visible() checks
data->num_function_row_keys to decide whether to expose the
function_row_physmap sysfs attribute, and on a failed read we do not
want to expose a bogus all-zero keymap to userspace.

Also, keeping "out: kfree(buf);" at the very end of the function across
parse_usage makes the control flow and cleanup awkward (having to
initialize buf to NULL, jumping over the allocation on usage_index > 0,
and using goto out in parse_usage even though buf is no longer needed
once the report is processed), and it prevents using __free(kfree) for
buf.

Since vivaldi_feature_mapping() already has the entire field in hand,
why don't we bail out immediately when usage->usage_index != 0, fetch
the report once at usage_index == 0 using __free(kfree), and iterate
over all usages in the field right there?

Please rebase your patch on top of Shashikirana's patch extracting the
feature report value directly via hid_field_extract() before
resubmitting:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261013-upstream-vivaldi-fix-v2-1-ecc20329d24c@chromium.org

With that in place, vivaldi_feature_mapping() can simply become:

	if (field->logical != HID_USAGE_FN_ROW_PHYSMAP || usage->usage_index)
		return;

	u8 *buf __free(kfree) = hid_alloc_report_buf(report, GFP_KERNEL);
	if (!buf)
		return;

	report_len = hid_report_len(report) + !report->id;
	ret = hid_hw_raw_request(hdev, report->id, buf, report_len,
				 HID_FEATURE_REPORT, HID_REQ_GET_REPORT);
	if (ret != report_len) {
		dev_warn(&hdev->dev, "failed to fetch feature %d: %d\n",
			 report->id, ret);
		return;
	}

	for (i = 0; i < field->maxusage && i < field->report_count; i++) {
		usage = &field->usage[i];

		if ((usage->hid & HID_USAGE_PAGE) != HID_UP_ORDINAL)
			continue;

		fn_key = usage->hid & HID_USAGE;
		if (fn_key < MIN_FN_ROW_KEY || fn_key > MAX_FN_ROW_KEY)
			continue;

		if (fn_key > data->num_function_row_keys)
			data->num_function_row_keys = fn_key;

		offset = field->report_offset + i * field->report_size;
		data->function_row_physmap[fn_key - MIN_FN_ROW_KEY] =
			hid_field_extract(hdev, buf + 1, offset,
					  field->report_size);
	}

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-15  5:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-12 21:29 [PATCH] HID: vivaldi: avoid redundant feature report reads per usage Zhengping Jiang
2026-10-12 21:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 22:02 ` [PATCH v2] " Zhengping Jiang
2026-10-13 19:23   ` [PATCH v3] " Zhengping Jiang
2026-10-15  5:32     ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2026-10-15  6:42       ` [PATCH v4] " Zhengping Jiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=01c8cf7d695261ba8270ff57aa8f2a6f@gmail.com \
    --to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=apusaka@google.com \
    --cc=bentiss@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangzp@google.com \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shashikiranah@chromium.org \
    --cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox