Re: [PATCH 2/5] Port hid-lg4ff to ff-memless-next

["Michal Malý" <madcatxster@prifuk.cz>]

On Thursday 20 of February 2014 16:16:52 Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Feb 2014, Michal Malý wrote:
> > > > We need to think carefully on this as a '+10' combined with '-10'
> > > > force
> > > > will result in '0'; however we do not want to deactivate the wheel
> > > > (no-resistance mode) as this will result in 'ticking' on the wheel as
> > > > force transitions through 0.... ideally we'd need to know that there
> > > > are
> > > > no forces set.
> > > 
> > > No problem Simon, this is thought about:
> > > If forces are active, and they cancel out, hid_lg4ff_start_combined is
> > > called with 0 force (scaled_x = 0x80), instead of
> > > hid_lg4ff_stop_combined
> > > as you assumed.
> > 
> > Okay, so to set things straight: I should modify to patch to send 0x13
> > when
> > the effect is fully stopped and use 0x11 0x80 to only zeroize the force
> > when the overall force is zero? My DFP doesn't differentiate between
> > these states so I cannot tell what is the right thing to do.
> 
> Has there been any conclusion to this, please?

Yes the has and the necessary fix is already in place in my working copy along 
with another few fixed to the ff-memless-next. Do you consider our approach 
sane and viable for mainlining? I've already explained to Joe Perches why I 
propose ff-memless-next as a separate module rather than a patch to ff-memless 
we have now. Unless anybody has any objections I'll check in with the rest of 
the guys and submit a hopefully final version within a day or two.

Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html