From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Vicki Pfau" <vi@endrift.com>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] HID: steam: Coalesce rumble packets
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2026 22:34:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260702223417.8DE621F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260702222145.1863104-5-vi@endrift.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Self-deadlock in workqueue callbacks due to double locking of `steam->report_mutex`.
--
commit d77d97e537a9b42840329852b61faf365ef03366
Author: Vicki Pfau <vi@endrift.com>
HID: steam: Coalesce rumble packets
This commit introduces a delayed workqueue to rate-limit and coalesce rumble
packets to 20Hz on Steam Deck devices. It also modifies the existing rumble
work callback to add a mutex guard.
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-steam.c b/drivers/hid/hid-steam.c
> index 34653ad383ac0..01b64194ec97b 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-steam.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-steam.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -603,10 +604,26 @@ static void steam_haptic_rumble_cb(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> struct steam_device *steam = container_of(work, struct steam_device,
> rumble_work);
> +
> + guard(mutex)(&steam->report_mutex);
> steam_haptic_rumble(steam, 0, steam->rumble_left,
> steam->rumble_right, 2, 0);
[Severity: High]
Will this cause a self-deadlock when playing force-feedback rumble effects?
This callback acquires report_mutex using guard(), but then immediately calls
steam_haptic_rumble(), which acquires the same mutex again:
steam_haptic_rumble() {
...
mutex_lock(&steam->report_mutex);
ret = steam_send_report(steam, report, sizeof(report));
mutex_unlock(&steam->report_mutex);
return ret;
}
Since Linux mutexes are not recursive, won't this hang the worker thread
and block any subsequent operations needing the report_mutex?
> }
>
> +static void steam_coalesce_rumble_cb(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct steam_device *steam = container_of(to_delayed_work(work),
> + struct steam_device,
> + coalesce_rumble_work);
> +
> + guard(mutex)(&steam->report_mutex);
> + steam_haptic_rumble(steam, 0, steam->rumble_left,
> + steam->rumble_right, 2, 0);
[Severity: High]
Does this new callback have the same self-deadlock issue as described above,
since it also calls steam_haptic_rumble() while holding report_mutex?
> +
> + if (steam->rumble_left || steam->rumble_right)
> + schedule_delayed_work(&steam->coalesce_rumble_work, HZ / 20);
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260702222145.1863104-1-vi@endrift.com?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-02 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-02 22:21 [PATCH 01/10] HID: steam: Update documentation Vicki Pfau
2026-07-02 22:21 ` [PATCH 02/10] HID: steam: Refactor and clean up report parsing Vicki Pfau
2026-07-02 22:21 ` [PATCH 03/10] HID: steam: Rename some constants that got renamed upstream Vicki Pfau
2026-07-02 22:21 ` [PATCH 04/10] HID: steam: Add support for sensor events on the Steam Controller (2015) Vicki Pfau
2026-07-02 22:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 22:21 ` [PATCH 05/10] HID: steam: Coalesce rumble packets Vicki Pfau
2026-07-02 22:34 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-02 22:21 ` [PATCH 06/10] HID: steam: Fully unregister controller when hidraw is opened Vicki Pfau
2026-07-02 22:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 22:21 ` [PATCH 07/10] HID: steam: Rearrange deinitialization sequence Vicki Pfau
2026-07-02 22:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 22:21 ` [PATCH 08/10] HID: steam: Improve logging and other cleanup Vicki Pfau
2026-07-02 22:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-02 22:21 ` [PATCH 09/10] HID: steam: Reject short reads Vicki Pfau
2026-07-02 22:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-03 11:26 ` Yousef Alhouseen
2026-07-02 22:21 ` [PATCH 10/10] HID: steam: Retry send/recv reports if stale Vicki Pfau
2026-07-02 22:36 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260702223417.8DE621F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vi@endrift.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox