* [PATCH v2] Input: iforce - validate input packet lengths
@ 2026-07-20 11:50 Pengpeng Hou
2026-07-20 12:12 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Pengpeng Hou @ 2026-07-20 11:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dmitry Torokhov; +Cc: Bryam Vargas, linux-input, linux-kernel, Pengpeng Hou
iforce_process_packet() reads fixed fields from joystick, wheel and status
packets without first checking their lengths. In particular, the shared
hats-and-buttons helper unconditionally reads data[6]. The status tail is
a sequence of 16-bit effect addresses, but an incomplete final address is
also consumed. A successful zero-length USB URB additionally reads the
packet ID before the common parser is called.
Reject the zero-length USB transfer, require the seven-byte joystick and
wheel prefixes and the two-byte status prefix, and consume only complete
status-tail addresses.
Signed-off-by: Pengpeng Hou <pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn>
---
Changes since v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260706092016.78176-1-pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn/
- cover the data[6] access in the shared hats-and-buttons helper
- cover zero-length USB completions and incomplete status-tail u16 values
- rebase onto v7.2-rc4
drivers/input/joystick/iforce/iforce-packets.c | 11 ++++++++++-
drivers/input/joystick/iforce/iforce-usb.c | 3 +++
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/joystick/iforce/iforce-packets.c b/drivers/input/joystick/iforce/iforce-packets.c
index effa76bfd8f9..e8a34d68a51f 100644
--- a/drivers/input/joystick/iforce/iforce-packets.c
+++ b/drivers/input/joystick/iforce/iforce-packets.c
@@ -155,6 +155,9 @@ void iforce_process_packet(struct iforce *iforce,
switch (packet_id) {
case 0x01: /* joystick position data */
+ if (len < 7)
+ break;
+
input_report_abs(dev, ABS_X,
(__s16) get_unaligned_le16(data));
input_report_abs(dev, ABS_Y,
@@ -170,6 +173,9 @@ void iforce_process_packet(struct iforce *iforce,
break;
case 0x03: /* wheel position data */
+ if (len < 7)
+ break;
+
input_report_abs(dev, ABS_WHEEL,
(__s16) get_unaligned_le16(data));
input_report_abs(dev, ABS_GAS, 255 - data[2]);
@@ -181,6 +187,9 @@ void iforce_process_packet(struct iforce *iforce,
break;
case 0x02: /* status report */
+ if (len < 2)
+ break;
+
input_report_key(dev, BTN_DEAD, data[0] & 0x02);
input_sync(dev);
@@ -200,7 +209,7 @@ void iforce_process_packet(struct iforce *iforce,
}
}
- for (j = 3; j < len; j += 2)
+ for (j = 3; j + sizeof(u16) <= len; j += 2)
mark_core_as_ready(iforce, get_unaligned_le16(data + j));
break;
diff --git a/drivers/input/joystick/iforce/iforce-usb.c b/drivers/input/joystick/iforce/iforce-usb.c
index 0482eaaecf39..f04370e4191e 100644
--- a/drivers/input/joystick/iforce/iforce-usb.c
+++ b/drivers/input/joystick/iforce/iforce-usb.c
@@ -158,6 +158,9 @@ static void iforce_usb_irq(struct urb *urb)
goto exit;
}
+ if (!urb->actual_length)
+ goto exit;
+
iforce_process_packet(iforce, iforce_usb->data_in[0],
iforce_usb->data_in + 1, urb->actual_length - 1);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] Input: iforce - validate input packet lengths
2026-07-20 11:50 [PATCH v2] Input: iforce - validate input packet lengths Pengpeng Hou
@ 2026-07-20 12:12 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-07-20 12:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pengpeng Hou; +Cc: dmitry.torokhov, linux-input
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Data race on core_effect->flags due to non-atomic __test_and_set_bit.
- [Medium] Missing input_sync() after reporting force-feedback status (EV_FF_STATUS) events.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v2] Input: iforce - validate input packet lengths ---
commit 32891702a73654a7ce9748db1e4baa8f0cbb9362
Author: Pengpeng Hou <pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn>
Input: iforce - validate input packet lengths
iforce_process_packet() reads fixed fields from joystick, wheel and status
packets without first checking their lengths. In particular, the shared
hats-and-buttons helper unconditionally reads data[6]. The status tail is
a sequence of 16-bit effect addresses, but an incomplete final address is
also consumed. A successful zero-length USB URB additionally reads the
packet ID before the common parser is called.
Reject the zero-length USB transfer, require the seven-byte joystick and
wheel prefixes and the two-byte status prefix, and consume only complete
status-tail addresses.
> diff --git a/drivers/input/joystick/iforce/iforce-packets.c b/drivers/input/joystick/iforce/iforce-packets.c
> index effa76bfd8f9a..e8a34d68a51f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/joystick/iforce/iforce-packets.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/joystick/iforce/iforce-packets.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -200,7 +209,7 @@ void iforce_process_packet(struct iforce *iforce,
> }
> }
[Severity: Medium]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is there a missing input_sync() after the
input_report_ff_status() calls just above this code?
The input subsystem guidelines require that every logical group of events must
be followed by input_sync(), or the events stay in the buffer. While there is
an input_sync() earlier for BTN_DEAD, the EV_FF_STATUS events emitted here
might remain buffered and not reach userspace until a subsequent event
triggers another sync.
> - for (j = 3; j < len; j += 2)
> + for (j = 3; j + sizeof(u16) <= len; j += 2)
> mark_core_as_ready(iforce, get_unaligned_le16(data + j));
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does the call to
mark_core_as_ready() here expose a data race with iforce_upload_effect()?
The interrupt completion handler calls mark_core_as_ready(), which uses atomic
bit operations on core_effects[i].flags:
drivers/input/joystick/iforce/iforce-packets.c:mark_core_as_ready() {
...
clear_bit(FF_CORE_UPDATE, iforce->core_effects[i].flags);
...
}
However, iforce_upload_effect() in iforce-main.c executes in process context
with ff->mutex held (which does not disable interrupts) and uses a non-atomic
read-modify-write:
drivers/input/joystick/iforce/iforce-main.c:iforce_upload_effect() {
...
if (__test_and_set_bit(FF_CORE_IS_USED, core_effect->flags)) {
...
}
If the interrupt executes between the read and write phases of
__test_and_set_bit(), the interrupt's modification could be overwritten.
Could this potentially leave FF_CORE_UPDATE stuck at 1 and render the effect
impossible to update again?
> break;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260720115018.75045-1-pengpeng@iscas.ac.cn?part=1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-20 12:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-20 11:50 [PATCH v2] Input: iforce - validate input packet lengths Pengpeng Hou
2026-07-20 12:12 ` sashiko-bot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox