Linux Input/HID development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Svyatoslav Ryhel" <clamor95@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org,
	lee@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/6] dt-bindings: mfd: motorola-cpcap: document Mapphone and Mot CPCAP
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 10:16:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260721101605.5BFA11F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260721095654.429346-5-clamor95@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The new compatible strings are defined as standalone enums without a generic fallback, causing drivers to fail to probe.
- [Low] The commit message description starts with a lowercase letter, violating MFD subsystem guidelines.
--

--- Patch [4]: [PATCH v7 4/6] dt-bindings: mfd: motorola-cpcap: document Mapphone and Mot CPCAP ---
commit d9f93935d00aa3510052461fef588d4ce3014eed
Author: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@gmail.com>

dt-bindings: mfd: motorola-cpcap: document Mapphone and Mot CPCAP

Add compatibles for Mapphone and Mot CPCAP subdevice compositions. Both
variations cannot use st,6556002 fallback since they may be based on
different controllers.

> dt-bindings: mfd: motorola-cpcap: document Mapphone and Mot CPCAP

[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, but should the description part of the commit message be
capitalized? The MFD subsystem guidelines typically expect a capitalized
description after the subsystem prefix.

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/motorola,cpcap.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/motorola,cpcap.yaml
> index 76705ea56805a..da7abe2ec9126 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/motorola,cpcap.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/motorola,cpcap.yaml
> @@ -14,9 +14,14 @@ allOf:
>  
>  properties:
>    compatible:
> -    items:
> -      - const: motorola,cpcap
> -      - const: st,6556002
> +    oneOf:
> +      - enum:
> +          - motorola,mapphone-cpcap
> +          - motorola,mot-cpcap

[Severity: Medium]
Since these new compatible strings are defined as standalone enums without a
generic fallback, will the core driver fail to probe these devices? 

Looking at drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c, cpcap_of_match[] lacks a match for
these specific strings:

static const struct of_device_id cpcap_of_match[] = {
	{ .compatible = "motorola,cpcap", },
	{ .compatible = "st,6556002", },
	{},
};

Are there plans to update the driver's match table to recognize these new
standalone compatibles, or could a generic fallback like "motorola,cpcap" be
added to the bindings?

> +
> +      - items:
> +          - const: motorola,cpcap
> +          - const: st,6556002

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260721095654.429346-1-clamor95@gmail.com?part=4

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-21 10:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-21  9:56 [PATCH v7 0/6] mfd: cpcap: convert documentation to schema and add Mot board support Svyatoslav Ryhel
2026-07-21  9:56 ` [PATCH v7 1/6] dt-bindings: leds: leds-cpcap: convert to DT schema Svyatoslav Ryhel
2026-07-21 10:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-21 12:01   ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2026-07-21  9:56 ` [PATCH v7 2/6] dt-bindings: input: cpcap-pwrbutton: " Svyatoslav Ryhel
2026-07-21 10:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-21  9:56 ` [PATCH v7 3/6] dt-bindings: mfd: motorola-cpcap: " Svyatoslav Ryhel
2026-07-21 10:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-21  9:56 ` [PATCH v7 4/6] dt-bindings: mfd: motorola-cpcap: document Mapphone and Mot CPCAP Svyatoslav Ryhel
2026-07-21 10:16   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-21  9:56 ` [PATCH v7 5/6] mfd: motorola-cpcap: diverge configuration per-board Svyatoslav Ryhel
2026-07-21 10:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-21  9:56 ` [PATCH v7 6/6] mfd: motorola-cpcap: add support for Mot CPCAP composition Svyatoslav Ryhel
2026-07-21 10:20   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260721101605.5BFA11F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=clamor95@gmail.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox