From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Lee Jones" <lee@kernel.org>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 4/5] HID: wacom: Fix Use-After-Free in wacom_bamboo_pad
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 14:02:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260902140226.C3B101F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902134417.1270552-4-lee@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Cross-device Use-After-Free in `wacom_mode_change_work()` due to lockless access to sibling devices without RCU read lock.
--
commit 4b7151c8603346fbd9de5581ed53af8776799547
Author: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
HID: wacom: Fix Use-After-Free in wacom_bamboo_pad
This commit fixes a Use-After-Free in wacom_bamboo_pad_pen_event by introducing
RCU protection for pen and touch pointers. It adds rcu_read_lock() and
rcu_dereference() wrappers to lockless readers, while using rcu_access_pointer
in wacom_mode_change_work() to suppress warnings.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/wacom_sys.c b/drivers/hid/wacom_sys.c
> index 1af0d518260d6..12f6a32cbc5fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/wacom_sys.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/wacom_sys.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2833,16 +2844,19 @@ static void wacom_mode_change_work(struct work_struct *work)
> bool is_direct = wacom->wacom_wac.is_direct_mode;
> int error = 0;
>
> - if (shared->pen) {
> - wacom1 = hid_get_drvdata(shared->pen);
> + struct hid_device *pen = rcu_access_pointer(shared->pen);
> + struct hid_device *touch = rcu_access_pointer(shared->touch);
> +
> + if (pen) {
> + wacom1 = hid_get_drvdata(pen);
[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can this lockless access to sibling devices
result in a cross-device Use-After-Free?
If wacom_mode_change_work() runs on a sibling device (e.g., touch) and reads
shared->pen using rcu_access_pointer() without holding rcu_read_lock():
1. Concurrently, the pen device is physically disconnected or unbound.
2. The pen device's unbind path calls wacom_remove_shared_data(), which
nullifies shared->pen and calls synchronize_rcu().
3. Because wacom_mode_change_work() does not hold rcu_read_lock(),
synchronize_rcu() does not block, allowing the pen device's unbind to
complete.
4. The pen device's struct wacom is freed via devres (devm_kzalloc in probe).
5. wacom_mode_change_work() then proceeds to dereference the freed pointer
via hid_get_drvdata(pen) and calls wacom_release_resources(wacom1) and
hid_hw_stop(wacom1->hdev) on it.
While the commit message notes this lockless access is a pre-existing issue,
could this still be triggered during a hot-unplug of a composite device during
a mode change event?
> wacom_release_resources(wacom1);
> hid_hw_stop(wacom1->hdev);
> wacom1->wacom_wac.has_mode_change = true;
> wacom1->wacom_wac.is_direct_mode = is_direct;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260902134417.1270552-1-lee@kernel.org?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-02 13:44 [PATCH v9 1/5] HID: wacom: Use hdev->product in wacom_setup_touch_input_capabilities Lee Jones
2026-09-02 13:44 ` [PATCH v9 2/5] HID: wacom: Advertise SW_MUTE_DEVICE capability prior to registration Lee Jones
2026-09-02 14:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 13:44 ` [PATCH v9 3/5] HID: wacom: Fix Use-After-Free in wacom_intuos_pad Lee Jones
2026-09-02 14:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 13:44 ` [PATCH v9 4/5] HID: wacom: Fix Use-After-Free in wacom_bamboo_pad Lee Jones
2026-09-02 14:02 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-02 13:44 ` [PATCH v9 5/5] HID: wacom: Redesign shared sibling data lifecycle Lee Jones
2026-09-02 14:05 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260902140226.C3B101F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox