From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Lee Jones" <lee@kernel.org>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/5] HID: wacom: Advertise SW_MUTE_DEVICE capability prior to registration
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 14:03:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260902140308.2DCE31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902134417.1270552-2-lee@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] Generic touch devices will enter an infinite -EPROBE_DEFER loop if they share a USB device with a non-Pen/Pad HID interface.
- [High] Standalone generic touch devices with a hardware mute switch will no longer advertise the SW_MUTE_DEVICE capability.
- [Medium] Missing memory barrier / RCU acquire semantics when reading shared sibling state causes a TOCTOU race.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing cancel_delayed_work_sync in the hid_hw_open error path causes a Use-After-Free.
--
commit bd90131f0064218ea089e2069fff71db08186576
Author: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Subject: HID: wacom: Advertise SW_MUTE_DEVICE capability prior to registration
This commit moves the SW_MUTE_DEVICE capability setup to
wacom_setup_touch_input_capabilities() for touch devices. It also defers
registration for generic touch devices until their sibling Pen/Pad interface
has been parsed and shared capabilities are initialized.
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/wacom_sys.c b/drivers/hid/wacom_sys.c
> index 0eafa483b7f75..026a6be467d3d 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/wacom_sys.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/wacom_sys.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2359,12 +2348,52 @@ static void wacom_set_shared_values(struct wacom_wac *wacom_wac)
[ ... ]
> +static bool wacom_sibling_pending(struct wacom *wacom)
> +{
> + struct hid_device *hdev = wacom->hdev;
> + const struct wacom_features *features = &wacom->wacom_wac.features;
> + struct usb_host_config *actconfig;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (features->type != HID_GENERIC ||
> + !(features->device_type & WACOM_DEVICETYPE_TOUCH))
> + return false;
> +
> + if (wacom->wacom_wac.shared &&
> + rcu_access_pointer(wacom->wacom_wac.shared->pen))
[Severity: Medium]
Is there a potential TOCTOU race here due to a missing acquire barrier?
Because rcu_access_pointer() does not provide an acquire memory barrier,
could weakly ordered CPUs reorder the reads, seeing the updated pen pointer
here but a stale false value for the switch flag later when
wacom_setup_touch_input_capabilities() checks shared->has_mute_touch_switch?
> + return false;
> +
> + if (!hid_is_usb(hdev) || !wacom->usbdev)
> + return false;
> +
> + if (features->oPid != HID_ANY_ID && features->oPid != 0)
> + return true;
> +
> + actconfig = wacom->usbdev->actconfig;
> + if (actconfig && actconfig->desc.bNumInterfaces > 1) {
> + for (i = 0; i < actconfig->desc.bNumInterfaces; i++) {
> + struct usb_interface *sibling_intf = actconfig->interface[i];
> +
> + if (!sibling_intf || sibling_intf == wacom->intf)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (sibling_intf->cur_altsetting->desc.bInterfaceClass ==
> + USB_INTERFACE_CLASS_HID)
[Severity: High]
Could this overly broad check lead to an infinite -EPROBE_DEFER loop?
If a generic touch device shares a USB device with a standard HID interface
(like a keyboard or raw vendor HID), the Wacom driver might reject the
standard interface, causing hid-generic to bind to it instead.
Since hid-generic would not populate wacom_wac.shared->pen, this check
would repeatedly observe shared->pen == NULL and a sibling interface with
USB_INTERFACE_CLASS_HID, returning true indefinitely. It seems this could
leave the touch interface permanently trapped in probe deferral.
> + return true;
> + }
> }
> +
> + return false;
> }
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/wacom_wac.c b/drivers/hid/wacom_wac.c
> index 4436faf2d2bbd..a7e3817aa2c4f 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/wacom_wac.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/wacom_wac.c
> @@ -3965,6 +3965,10 @@ int wacom_setup_touch_input_capabilities(struct input_dev *input_dev,
>
> if (features->type == HID_GENERIC) {
> hid_dbg(hdev, "generic touch setup\n");
> + if (wacom_wac->shared && wacom_wac->shared->has_mute_touch_switch) {
[Severity: High]
For standalone generic touch devices with a hardware mute switch, does this
result in the loss of the SW_MUTE_DEVICE capability?
The local parser sets the wacom_wac->has_mute_touch_switch flag, but this
now only checks the shared flag (wacom_wac->shared->has_mute_touch_switch).
However, wacom_set_shared_values() syncs the local flag to the shared
struct at the very end of wacom_parse_and_register(), which happens
after capabilities are set up. Could this leave the shared flag false
during setup for standalone devices, breaking userspace expectations?
> + input_set_capability(input_dev, EV_SW, SW_MUTE_DEVICE);
> + wacom_wac->has_mute_touch_switch = true;
> + }
> /* setup has already been done */
> return 0;
> }
[ ... ]
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but I noticed a potential use-after-free
in the hid_hw_open() error path of wacom_parse_and_register().
During device probe, wacom_query_tablet_data() schedules wacom->init_work
with a 1-second delay. If the device has WACOM_DEVICETYPE_WL_MONITOR and
the subsequent hid_hw_open() fails:
if (features->device_type & WACOM_DEVICETYPE_WL_MONITOR) {
error = hid_hw_open(hdev);
if (error) {
hid_err(hdev, "hw open failed\n");
goto fail_hw_stop;
}
}
The code jumps to fail_hw_stop without canceling the delayed work. Since
the devres framework frees the wacom structure on probe failure, does this
leave a dangling timer that will attempt to access freed memory when
wacom->init_work runs? Should cancel_delayed_work_sync(&wacom->init_work)
be called in this error path?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260902134417.1270552-1-lee@kernel.org?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-02 13:44 [PATCH v9 1/5] HID: wacom: Use hdev->product in wacom_setup_touch_input_capabilities Lee Jones
2026-09-02 13:44 ` [PATCH v9 2/5] HID: wacom: Advertise SW_MUTE_DEVICE capability prior to registration Lee Jones
2026-09-02 14:03 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-02 13:44 ` [PATCH v9 3/5] HID: wacom: Fix Use-After-Free in wacom_intuos_pad Lee Jones
2026-09-02 14:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 13:44 ` [PATCH v9 4/5] HID: wacom: Fix Use-After-Free in wacom_bamboo_pad Lee Jones
2026-09-02 14:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 13:44 ` [PATCH v9 5/5] HID: wacom: Redesign shared sibling data lifecycle Lee Jones
2026-09-02 14:05 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260902140308.2DCE31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox