From: "Hohndel, Dirk" <hohndel@linux.intel.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@jikos.cz>,
linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] INPUT: fix hidinput_connect ignoring retval from input_register_device
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 08:38:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CE5A712-C0BE-45EE-9171-C3B54F789483@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d120d5000710290833i5ed524d6ne95fc1ef34834566@mail.gmail.com>
On Oct 29, 2007, at 8:33 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On 10/29/07, Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> Actually, the more I look at the code that bails when it runs out
>> of memory,
>> the more I wonder about that.
>>
>> hidinput = kzalloc(sizeof(*hidinput), GFP_KERNEL);
>> input_dev = input_allocate_device();
>> if (!hidinput || !input_dev) {
>> kfree(hidinput);
>> input_free_device(input_dev);
>>
>> This either passes a NULL pointer to kfree or to
>> input_free_device. That's
>> not nice.
>>
>
> No, that's allright. input_free_device() takes after kfree() so that
> it safe to call it with NULL pointer.
Ahh - should have checked that.
Will the rest of the patch work with the call to hidinput_disconnect?
If yes then
I'll send a cleaned up version that removes the unnecessary checks in
the case here...
/D
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-29 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-29 6:51 [PATCH] INPUT: fix hidinput_connect ignoring retval from input_register_device Dirk Hohndel
2007-10-29 7:53 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-29 8:49 ` Dirk Hohndel
2007-10-29 9:35 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-29 10:14 ` Jiri Kosina
2007-10-29 12:54 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-10-29 12:57 ` Jiri Kosina
2007-10-29 14:49 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-29 15:20 ` Dirk Hohndel
2007-10-29 15:33 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-10-29 15:38 ` Hohndel, Dirk [this message]
2007-10-29 17:11 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-10-29 17:28 ` Jiri Kosina
2007-10-29 22:50 ` Dirk Hohndel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3CE5A712-C0BE-45EE-9171-C3B54F789483@linux.intel.com \
--to=hohndel@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jikos@jikos.cz \
--cc=linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox