* [PATCH] Input: rmi_smbus - fix out-of-bounds read in rmi_smb_write_block()
@ 2026-08-05 5:08 Dmitry Torokhov
2026-08-05 5:20 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Torokhov @ 2026-08-05 5:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-input; +Cc: Benjamin Tissoires, Andrew Duggan, linux-kernel
When chunking writes into SMBus blocks in rmi_smb_write_block(), the
loop calculates block_len using the original total length (len) instead
of the remaining length (cur_len).
If len is greater than 32 bytes (SMB_MAX_COUNT), block_len remains 32
for every iteration, even on the final partial chunk where fewer than 32
bytes remain. This causes smb_block_write() to read 32 bytes from the
advanced data buffer pointer, reading past the end of the input buffer.
Fix this by calculating block_len using cur_len and advancing the buffer
and address pointers by block_len.
Fixes: 82264d0cf7aef ("Input: synaptics-rmi4 - add SMBus support")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Assisted-by: Antigravity:gemini-3.6-flash
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
---
drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c
index 6de68c602558..d799405fbd33 100644
--- a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c
+++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static int rmi_smb_write_block(struct rmi_transport_dev *xport, u16 rmiaddr,
u8 commandcode;
struct rmi_smb_xport *rmi_smb =
container_of(xport, struct rmi_smb_xport, xport);
- int cur_len = (int)len;
+ size_t cur_len = len;
mutex_lock(&rmi_smb->page_mutex);
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static int rmi_smb_write_block(struct rmi_transport_dev *xport, u16 rmiaddr,
/*
* break into 32 bytes chunks to write get command code
*/
- int block_len = min_t(int, len, SMB_MAX_COUNT);
+ int block_len = min_t(size_t, cur_len, SMB_MAX_COUNT);
retval = rmi_smb_get_command_code(xport, rmiaddr, block_len,
false, &commandcode);
@@ -161,9 +161,9 @@ static int rmi_smb_write_block(struct rmi_transport_dev *xport, u16 rmiaddr,
goto exit;
/* prepare to write next block of bytes */
- cur_len -= SMB_MAX_COUNT;
- databuff += SMB_MAX_COUNT;
- rmiaddr += SMB_MAX_COUNT;
+ cur_len -= block_len;
+ databuff += block_len;
+ rmiaddr += block_len;
}
exit:
mutex_unlock(&rmi_smb->page_mutex);
--
2.55.0.571.g244d577d93-goog
--
Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Input: rmi_smbus - fix out-of-bounds read in rmi_smb_write_block()
2026-08-05 5:08 [PATCH] Input: rmi_smbus - fix out-of-bounds read in rmi_smb_write_block() Dmitry Torokhov
@ 2026-08-05 5:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 5:23 ` Dmitry Torokhov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-08-05 5:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dmitry Torokhov; +Cc: linux-input, dmitry.torokhov
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Pre-existing stack/heap buffer overflow in `rmi_smb_read_block()` due to unsafe use of `i2c_smbus_read_block_data()` without a bounce buffer.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] Input: rmi_smbus - fix out-of-bounds read in rmi_smb_write_block() ---
commit 530e4667b6144c7e030412bbc818f1de86a5a09e
Author: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Input: rmi_smbus - fix out-of-bounds read in rmi_smb_write_block()
This commit fixes an out-of-bounds read in rmi_smb_write_block() by ensuring
block_len is calculated using the remaining length (cur_len) rather than the
original total length.
> diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c
> --- a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static int rmi_smb_write_block(struct rmi_transport_dev *xport, u16 rmiaddr,
> /*
> * break into 32 bytes chunks to write get command code
> */
> - int block_len = min_t(int, len, SMB_MAX_COUNT);
> + int block_len = min_t(size_t, cur_len, SMB_MAX_COUNT);
>
> retval = rmi_smb_get_command_code(xport, rmiaddr, block_len,
> false, &commandcode);
[ ... ]
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but since the chunking logic in
rmi_smb_write_block() is being corrected here, does a similar buffer overflow
exist in the read path?
Looking at smb_block_read(), it ignores the len argument and passes the
buffer directly to i2c_smbus_read_block_data():
drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c:smb_block_read() {
...
retval = i2c_smbus_read_block_data(client, commandcode, buf);
...
}
If a caller requests a small read, or if the final partial chunk in
rmi_smb_read_block() has less than 32 bytes of capacity remaining:
drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c:rmi_smb_read_block() {
...
retval = smb_block_read(xport, commandcode, databuff, block_len);
...
}
Could a malfunctioning I2C device returning a length greater than block_len
cause the I2C core to unconditionally copy up to 32 bytes, overflowing
the databuff allocation?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/anLFSMKSoKyyZ272@google.com?part=1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Input: rmi_smbus - fix out-of-bounds read in rmi_smb_write_block()
2026-08-05 5:20 ` sashiko-bot
@ 2026-08-05 5:23 ` Dmitry Torokhov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Torokhov @ 2026-08-05 5:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sashiko-reviews; +Cc: linux-input
On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 05:20:39AM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
>
> Pre-existing issues:
> - [High] Pre-existing stack/heap buffer overflow in `rmi_smb_read_block()` due to unsafe use of `i2c_smbus_read_block_data()` without a bounce buffer.
> --
>
> --- Patch [1]: [PATCH] Input: rmi_smbus - fix out-of-bounds read in rmi_smb_write_block() ---
> commit 530e4667b6144c7e030412bbc818f1de86a5a09e
> Author: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
>
> Input: rmi_smbus - fix out-of-bounds read in rmi_smb_write_block()
>
> This commit fixes an out-of-bounds read in rmi_smb_write_block() by ensuring
> block_len is calculated using the remaining length (cur_len) rather than the
> original total length.
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c
> > --- a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c
> > +++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c
> [ ... ]
> > @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static int rmi_smb_write_block(struct rmi_transport_dev *xport, u16 rmiaddr,
> > /*
> > * break into 32 bytes chunks to write get command code
> > */
> > - int block_len = min_t(int, len, SMB_MAX_COUNT);
> > + int block_len = min_t(size_t, cur_len, SMB_MAX_COUNT);
> >
> > retval = rmi_smb_get_command_code(xport, rmiaddr, block_len,
> > false, &commandcode);
> [ ... ]
>
> [Severity: High]
> This is a pre-existing issue, but since the chunking logic in
> rmi_smb_write_block() is being corrected here, does a similar buffer overflow
> exist in the read path?
>
> Looking at smb_block_read(), it ignores the len argument and passes the
> buffer directly to i2c_smbus_read_block_data():
>
> drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c:smb_block_read() {
> ...
> retval = i2c_smbus_read_block_data(client, commandcode, buf);
> ...
> }
>
> If a caller requests a small read, or if the final partial chunk in
> rmi_smb_read_block() has less than 32 bytes of capacity remaining:
>
> drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_smbus.c:rmi_smb_read_block() {
> ...
> retval = smb_block_read(xport, commandcode, databuff, block_len);
> ...
> }
>
> Could a malfunctioning I2C device returning a length greater than block_len
> cause the I2C core to unconditionally copy up to 32 bytes, overflowing
> the databuff allocation?
>
Yes, but I hope this can be addressed once improved version of
i2c_smbus_read_block_data() lands.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-05 5:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-08-05 5:08 [PATCH] Input: rmi_smbus - fix out-of-bounds read in rmi_smb_write_block() Dmitry Torokhov
2026-08-05 5:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-05 5:23 ` Dmitry Torokhov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox