From: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
Cc: dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 00/10] Fix dm-ima bugs
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 20:22:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260414002244.1917447-1-bmarzins@redhat.com> (raw)
The dm-ima code does not guarantee that the dm_ima_measure_on_*
functions will not be called at the same time. Since they modify and
free shared memory, this can lead to Use-After-Free errors or garbage
measurements. Further, they don't make sure that the state they measure
corresponds to the actual device state. For instance if table_load()
runs at the same time as do_resume() on a table swap,
dm_ima_measure_on_device_resume() can end up thinking the wrong table is
active. Or a concurrent dm_hash_rename() and a table swap, can end up
with a the new active table still using the old name. This patchset
makes sure the the dm-ima function are serialized and report the correct
device state.
However, the code is still messier that in could be. This is because
it duplicates the current measurement events and format. I would really
like to know if that is necessary. Specifically, it currently measures
the following dm device and table actions:
load
clear
rename
resume
remove
I don't see the benefit of reporting changes to the inactive table, or
resumes where the device does not change state. From the user's point of
view, the device is still the same after these events. At the same
time, it doesn't measure device creates if no table was loaded, so you
can have situations where the the first measurement for a device is a
rename or a remove. A more sensible set of actions to measure would be:
create
table_swap
rename
remove
Also, the measurement format doesn't map well to how dm device's are
actually set up, in a way that makes it harder for the code and records
extraneous information. First, like I mentioned before, I don't see the
benefit of measuring the inactive table. Second, the name, uuid, and
major/minor numbers are properties of the device, not it's table (and dm
devices can't have partitions, so the minor count will always be 1). I
don't see a reason to store and occasinally log this information twice,
if there is an active and incative table, and it forces extra
coordination between the dm_ima_measure_on_* functions.
I'm wondering it we are stuck with the current events and format, now
that this has been released? Or could we bump the version, and change
what events we measure, and how we format the output?
Benjamin Marzinski (10):
dm-ima: remove dm_ima_reset_data()
dm-ima: remove broken last_target_measured logic
dm-ima: Remove status_flags from dm_ima_measure_on_table_load()
dm-ima: don't copy the active table to the inactive table
dm-ima: Fix UAF errors and measuring incorrect context
dm-ima: remove new_map from dm_ima_measure_on_device_clear
dm-ima: Fix issues with dm_ima_measure_on_device_rename
dm-ima: Handle race between rename and table swap
dm-ima: Fail more gracefully in dm_ima_measure_on_*
dm-ima: use active table's size if available
drivers/md/dm-ima.c | 506 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
drivers/md/dm-ima.h | 67 ++++--
drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c | 146 +++++++++++-
drivers/md/dm.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 421 insertions(+), 300 deletions(-)
--
2.53.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-04-14 0:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-14 0:22 Benjamin Marzinski [this message]
2026-04-14 0:22 ` [PATCH 01/10] dm-ima: remove dm_ima_reset_data() Benjamin Marzinski
2026-04-14 0:22 ` [PATCH 02/10] dm-ima: remove broken last_target_measured logic Benjamin Marzinski
2026-04-14 0:22 ` [PATCH 03/10] dm-ima: Remove status_flags from dm_ima_measure_on_table_load() Benjamin Marzinski
2026-04-14 0:22 ` [PATCH 04/10] dm-ima: don't copy the active table to the inactive table Benjamin Marzinski
2026-04-14 0:22 ` [PATCH 05/10] dm-ima: Fix UAF errors and measuring incorrect context Benjamin Marzinski
2026-04-27 19:33 ` Mikulas Patocka
2026-04-27 19:42 ` Mikulas Patocka
2026-04-14 0:22 ` [PATCH 06/10] dm-ima: remove new_map from dm_ima_measure_on_device_clear Benjamin Marzinski
2026-04-14 0:22 ` [PATCH 07/10] dm-ima: Fix issues with dm_ima_measure_on_device_rename Benjamin Marzinski
2026-04-14 0:22 ` [PATCH 08/10] dm-ima: Handle race between rename and table swap Benjamin Marzinski
2026-04-14 0:22 ` [PATCH 09/10] dm-ima: Fail more gracefully in dm_ima_measure_on_* Benjamin Marzinski
2026-04-14 0:22 ` [PATCH 10/10] dm-ima: use active table's size if available Benjamin Marzinski
2026-04-14 17:12 ` [RFC PATCH 00/10] Fix dm-ima bugs Mike Snitzer
2026-04-14 18:35 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2026-04-15 2:06 ` Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260414002244.1917447-1-bmarzins@redhat.com \
--to=bmarzins@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox