[PATCH v4 01/71] tpm: Switch to new Intel CPU model defines

[PATCH v4 01/71] tpm: Switch to new Intel CPU model defines

[Tony Luck]

New CPU #defines encode vendor and family as well as model.

Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h          | 2 +-
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
index 61445f1dc46d..7b38ce007bdc 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
 #include <linux/tpm_eventlog.h>
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86
-#include <asm/intel-family.h>
+#include <asm/cpu_device_id.h>
 #endif
 
 #define TPM_MINOR		224	/* officially assigned */
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h
index 13e99cf65efe..c940fd18988e 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ static inline int tpm_tis_verify_crc(struct tpm_tis_data *data, size_t len,
 static inline bool is_bsw(void)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86
-	return ((boot_cpu_data.x86_model == INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_AIRMONT) ? 1 : 0);
+	return ((boot_cpu_data.x86_vfm == INTEL_ATOM_AIRMONT) ? 1 : 0);
 #else
 	return false;
 #endif
-- 
2.44.0

Re: [PATCH v4 01/71] tpm: Switch to new Intel CPU model defines

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

On Wed Apr 24, 2024 at 9:14 PM EEST, Tony Luck wrote:
> New CPU #defines encode vendor and family as well as model.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h          | 2 +-
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
> index 61445f1dc46d..7b38ce007bdc 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
>  #include <linux/tpm_eventlog.h>
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86
> -#include <asm/intel-family.h>
> +#include <asm/cpu_device_id.h>
>  #endif
>  
>  #define TPM_MINOR		224	/* officially assigned */
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h
> index 13e99cf65efe..c940fd18988e 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h
> @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ static inline int tpm_tis_verify_crc(struct tpm_tis_data *data, size_t len,
>  static inline bool is_bsw(void)
>  {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86
> -	return ((boot_cpu_data.x86_model == INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_AIRMONT) ? 1 : 0);
> +	return ((boot_cpu_data.x86_vfm == INTEL_ATOM_AIRMONT) ? 1 : 0);
>  #else
>  	return false;
>  #endif

+1

BR, Jarkko

Re: [PATCH v4 01/71] tpm: Switch to new Intel CPU model defines

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

On Thu Apr 25, 2024 at 7:48 AM EEST, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Wed Apr 24, 2024 at 9:14 PM EEST, Tony Luck wrote:
> > New CPU #defines encode vendor and family as well as model.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h          | 2 +-
> >  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h | 2 +-
> >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
> > index 61445f1dc46d..7b38ce007bdc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
> > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
> > @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/tpm_eventlog.h>
> >  
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_X86
> > -#include <asm/intel-family.h>
> > +#include <asm/cpu_device_id.h>
> >  #endif
> >  
> >  #define TPM_MINOR		224	/* officially assigned */
> > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h
> > index 13e99cf65efe..c940fd18988e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h
> > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h
> > @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ static inline int tpm_tis_verify_crc(struct tpm_tis_data *data, size_t len,
> >  static inline bool is_bsw(void)
> >  {
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_X86
> > -	return ((boot_cpu_data.x86_model == INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_AIRMONT) ? 1 : 0);
> > +	return ((boot_cpu_data.x86_vfm == INTEL_ATOM_AIRMONT) ? 1 : 0);

Umh I guess one could complain about extra parentheses ;-)

Not sure if I care, if no other updates needed, probably don't.

> >  #else
> >  	return false;
> >  #endif
>
> +1
>
> BR, Jarkko

BR, Jarkko