public inbox for linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] tpm_tis: Check for an error after exhausting send retires
@ 2026-04-10 21:13 Jacqueline Wong
  2026-04-10 21:21 ` Paul Menzel
  2026-04-15  2:38 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jacqueline Wong @ 2026-04-10 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peterhuewe, jarkko
  Cc: jgg, Alexander.Steffen, linux-integrity, linux-kernel,
	axelrasmussen, Jordan Hand

From: Jordan Hand <jhand@google.com>

tpm_tis_send_main() will attempt to retry sending data TPM_RETRY times.
Currently, if those retries are exhausted, the driver will attempt to
call execute. The TPM will be in the wrong state, leading to the
operation simply timing out.

Instead, if there is still an error after retries are exhausted, return
that error immediately.

Additionally, add logging to more easily determine reason for transmit
failure.

Fixes: 280db21e153d8 ("tpm_tis: Resend command to recover from data transfer errors")
Signed-off-by: Jordan Hand <jhand@google.com>
---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
index e2a1769081b1..b78937841879 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
@@ -471,6 +471,8 @@ static int tpm_tis_send_data(struct tpm_chip *chip, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
 		status = tpm_tis_status(chip);
 		if (!itpm && (status & TPM_STS_DATA_EXPECT) == 0) {
 			rc = -EIO;
+			dev_err(&chip->dev, "TPM_STS_DATA_EXPECT should be set. sts = 0x%08x\n",
+					status);
 			goto out_err;
 		}
 	}
@@ -491,6 +493,8 @@ static int tpm_tis_send_data(struct tpm_chip *chip, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
 	status = tpm_tis_status(chip);
 	if (!itpm && (status & TPM_STS_DATA_EXPECT) != 0) {
 		rc = -EIO;
+		dev_err(&chip->dev, "TPM_STS_DATA_EXPECT should be unset. sts = 0x%08x\n",
+				status);
 		goto out_err;
 	}
 
@@ -552,11 +556,16 @@ static int tpm_tis_send_main(struct tpm_chip *chip, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
 			break;
 		else if (rc != -EAGAIN && rc != -EIO)
 			/* Data transfer failed, not recoverable */
-			return rc;
+			goto out_err;
 
 		usleep_range(priv->timeout_min, priv->timeout_max);
 	}
 
+	if (rc == -EAGAIN || rc == -EIO) {
+		dev_err(&chip->dev, "Exhausted tpm_tis_send_data retries\n");
+		goto out_err;
+	}
+
 	/* go and do it */
 	rc = tpm_tis_write8(priv, TPM_STS(priv->locality), TPM_STS_GO);
 	if (rc < 0)
-- 
2.53.0.1213.gd9a14994de-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] tpm_tis: Check for an error after exhausting send retires
  2026-04-10 21:13 [PATCH] tpm_tis: Check for an error after exhausting send retires Jacqueline Wong
@ 2026-04-10 21:21 ` Paul Menzel
  2026-04-15  2:38 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paul Menzel @ 2026-04-10 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jacqueline Wong
  Cc: peterhuewe, jarkko, jgg, Alexander.Steffen, linux-integrity,
	linux-kernel, axelrasmussen, Jordan Hand

Dear Jacqueline,


Thank you for your patch.

Am 10.04.26 um 23:13 schrieb Jacqueline Wong:
> From: Jordan Hand <jhand@google.com>
> 
> tpm_tis_send_main() will attempt to retry sending data TPM_RETRY times.
> Currently, if those retries are exhausted, the driver will attempt to
> call execute. The TPM will be in the wrong state, leading to the
> operation simply timing out.
> 
> Instead, if there is still an error after retries are exhausted, return
> that error immediately.
> 
> Additionally, add logging to more easily determine reason for transmit
> failure.

Please paste the logs without and with your patch of an effected system.

*Additionally* is often a good indicator to split the patch into even 
smaller pieces. ;-)

> Fixes: 280db21e153d8 ("tpm_tis: Resend command to recover from data transfer errors")
> Signed-off-by: Jordan Hand <jhand@google.com>
> ---
>   drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> index e2a1769081b1..b78937841879 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> @@ -471,6 +471,8 @@ static int tpm_tis_send_data(struct tpm_chip *chip, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
>   		status = tpm_tis_status(chip);
>   		if (!itpm && (status & TPM_STS_DATA_EXPECT) == 0) {
>   			rc = -EIO;
> +			dev_err(&chip->dev, "TPM_STS_DATA_EXPECT should be set. sts = 0x%08x\n",
> +					status);
>   			goto out_err;
>   		}
>   	}
> @@ -491,6 +493,8 @@ static int tpm_tis_send_data(struct tpm_chip *chip, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
>   	status = tpm_tis_status(chip);
>   	if (!itpm && (status & TPM_STS_DATA_EXPECT) != 0) {
>   		rc = -EIO;
> +		dev_err(&chip->dev, "TPM_STS_DATA_EXPECT should be unset. sts = 0x%08x\n",
> +				status);
>   		goto out_err;
>   	}
>   
> @@ -552,11 +556,16 @@ static int tpm_tis_send_main(struct tpm_chip *chip, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
>   			break;
>   		else if (rc != -EAGAIN && rc != -EIO)
>   			/* Data transfer failed, not recoverable */
> -			return rc;
> +			goto out_err;
>   
>   		usleep_range(priv->timeout_min, priv->timeout_max);
>   	}
>   
> +	if (rc == -EAGAIN || rc == -EIO) {
> +		dev_err(&chip->dev, "Exhausted tpm_tis_send_data retries\n");

Please also print the number of retries.

> +		goto out_err;
> +	}
> +
>   	/* go and do it */
>   	rc = tpm_tis_write8(priv, TPM_STS(priv->locality), TPM_STS_GO);
>   	if (rc < 0)

Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>


Kind regards,

Paul

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] tpm_tis: Check for an error after exhausting send retires
  2026-04-10 21:13 [PATCH] tpm_tis: Check for an error after exhausting send retires Jacqueline Wong
  2026-04-10 21:21 ` Paul Menzel
@ 2026-04-15  2:38 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2026-04-15  2:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jacqueline Wong
  Cc: peterhuewe, jgg, Alexander.Steffen, linux-integrity, linux-kernel,
	axelrasmussen, Jordan Hand

On Fri, Apr 10, 2026 at 09:13:50PM +0000, Jacqueline Wong wrote:
> From: Jordan Hand <jhand@google.com>
> 
> tpm_tis_send_main() will attempt to retry sending data TPM_RETRY times.
> Currently, if those retries are exhausted, the driver will attempt to
> call execute. The TPM will be in the wrong state, leading to the
> operation simply timing out.
> 
> Instead, if there is still an error after retries are exhausted, return
> that error immediately.
> 
> Additionally, add logging to more easily determine reason for transmit
> failure.
> 
> Fixes: 280db21e153d8 ("tpm_tis: Resend command to recover from data transfer errors")
> Signed-off-by: Jordan Hand <jhand@google.com>
> ---
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> index e2a1769081b1..b78937841879 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> @@ -471,6 +471,8 @@ static int tpm_tis_send_data(struct tpm_chip *chip, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
>  		status = tpm_tis_status(chip);
>  		if (!itpm && (status & TPM_STS_DATA_EXPECT) == 0) {
>  			rc = -EIO;
> +			dev_err(&chip->dev, "TPM_STS_DATA_EXPECT should be set. sts = 0x%08x\n",
> +					status);
>  			goto out_err;
>  		}
>  	}
> @@ -491,6 +493,8 @@ static int tpm_tis_send_data(struct tpm_chip *chip, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
>  	status = tpm_tis_status(chip);
>  	if (!itpm && (status & TPM_STS_DATA_EXPECT) != 0) {
>  		rc = -EIO;
> +		dev_err(&chip->dev, "TPM_STS_DATA_EXPECT should be unset. sts = 0x%08x\n",
> +				status);
>  		goto out_err;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -552,11 +556,16 @@ static int tpm_tis_send_main(struct tpm_chip *chip, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
>  			break;
>  		else if (rc != -EAGAIN && rc != -EIO)
>  			/* Data transfer failed, not recoverable */
> -			return rc;
> +			goto out_err;
>  
>  		usleep_range(priv->timeout_min, priv->timeout_max);
>  	}
>  
> +	if (rc == -EAGAIN || rc == -EIO) {
> +		dev_err(&chip->dev, "Exhausted tpm_tis_send_data retries\n");
> +		goto out_err;
> +	}
> +
>  	/* go and do it */
>  	rc = tpm_tis_write8(priv, TPM_STS(priv->locality), TPM_STS_GO);
>  	if (rc < 0)
> -- 
> 2.53.0.1213.gd9a14994de-goog
> 

CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
#35: FILE: drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c:475:
+                       dev_err(&chip->dev, "TPM_STS_DATA_EXPECT should be set. sts = 0x%08x\n",
+                                       status);

CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
#44: FILE: drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c:497:
+               dev_err(&chip->dev, "TPM_STS_DATA_EXPECT should be unset. sts = 0x%08x\n",
+                               status);


I fixed these manually.

Good catch, thanks:

Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>

Applied.

BR, Jarkko

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-04-15  2:38 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-04-10 21:13 [PATCH] tpm_tis: Check for an error after exhausting send retires Jacqueline Wong
2026-04-10 21:21 ` Paul Menzel
2026-04-15  2:38 ` Jarkko Sakkinen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox