Linux IOMMU Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: "Li,Rongqing" <lirongqing@baidu.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, ZhaoJinming <zhaojinming@uniontech.com>,
	Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@yandex.ru>,
	Guanghui Feng <guanghuifeng@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Desnes Nunes <desnesn@redhat.com>,
	"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 答复: [外部邮件] [PATCH 03/20] iommu/vt-d: Fix CACHE_TAG_NESTING_DEVTLB polluting shared variables in flush loop
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2026 13:28:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <04718cf6-3096-4dd3-ab35-48d950998479@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d507f3039cec41a0be8782df1196294f@baidu.com>

On 8/4/2026 11:16 AM, Li,Rongqing wrote:
> 
> 
>> From: Guanghui Feng <guanghuifeng@linux.alibaba.com>
>>
>> In cache_tag_flush_range(), the CACHE_TAG_NESTING_DEVTLB case modifies the
>> shared local variables 'addr' and 'mask' before falling through to
>> CACHE_TAG_DEVTLB. This causes all subsequent CACHE_TAG_DEVTLB entries in
>> the same loop iteration to incorrectly use the full-range flush parameters
>> (addr=0, mask=MAX_AGAW_PFN_WIDTH) instead of the precisely calculated PSI
>> range. This is not the intended behavior, as regular DEVTLB entries should always
>> perform targeted range-based invalidation.
>>
>> Fix this by having CACHE_TAG_NESTING_DEVTLB directly call
>> cache_tag_flush_devtlb_psi() with the full-range constants and break, instead of
>> modifying shared variables and falling through. This ensures
>> CACHE_TAG_DEVTLB always uses the original calculated addr and mask for
>> precise range flush.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Guanghui Feng <guanghuifeng@linux.alibaba.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Guixin Liu <kanie@linux.alibaba.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/iommu/intel/cache.c | 5 ++---
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/cache.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/cache.c index
>> fdc88817709f..26a758b0f501 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/cache.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/cache.c
>> @@ -454,9 +454,8 @@ void cache_tag_flush_range(struct dmar_domain
>> *domain, unsigned long start,
>>   			 * affected by a change in S2. So just flush the entire
>>   			 * device cache.
>>   			 */
>> -			addr = 0;
>> -			mask = MAX_AGAW_PFN_WIDTH;
>> -			fallthrough;
>> +			cache_tag_flush_devtlb_psi(domain, tag, 0,
>> MAX_AGAW_PFN_WIDTH);
>> +			break;
>>   		case CACHE_TAG_DEVTLB:
>>   			cache_tag_flush_devtlb_psi(domain, tag, addr, mask);
>>   			break;
>> --
>> 2.43.0
> 
> This patch introduces a subtle side effect on the tracing logic later in this function.
> At the end of cache_tag_flush_range(), trace_cache_tag_flush_range(tag, start, end, addr, mask) is called to log
> the flush operation.
> 
> With this patch: bypassed the assignment and used break, addr and mask retain their original range values.
> This causes the tracepoint to log an incorrect, smaller range while the actual hardware execution was a full-range flush.

The tracepoint here records what the caller requested: a specific cache-
invalidation type for a specific range. In this helper, we may widen the
invalidation range for implementation reasons (as described in the
comments), but that does not change the caller’s original intent.
Therefore, this tracepoint should log the caller-requested range.

If we want to observe the actual invalidation range sent to hardware,
that is already covered by the qi_submit trace event, which logs the
real invalidation descriptors submitted by the driver.

> 
> My patch has not this issue:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20260605003950.1720-1-lirongqing@baidu.com/
Thanks,
baolu

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-04  5:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-04  2:36 [PATCH 00/20] [PULL REQUEST] Intel IOMMU updates for v7.3 Lu Baolu
2026-08-04  2:36 ` [PATCH 01/20] iommu/vt-d: Fix UCTP context table slot when copying root entries Lu Baolu
2026-08-04  2:36 ` [PATCH 02/20] iommu/vt-d: Use logical OR operator for privilege mode check Lu Baolu
2026-08-04  2:36 ` [PATCH 03/20] iommu/vt-d: Fix CACHE_TAG_NESTING_DEVTLB polluting shared variables in flush loop Lu Baolu
2026-08-04  3:16   ` 答复: [外部邮件] " Li,Rongqing
2026-08-04  5:28     ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2026-08-04  7:18       ` Baolu Lu
2026-08-04  2:36 ` [PATCH 04/20] iommu/vt-d: Use kstrtoint_from_user() in dmar_perf_latency_write() Lu Baolu
2026-08-04  2:36 ` [PATCH 05/20] iommu/vt-d: Fix no_iommu to disable platform opt-in Lu Baolu
2026-08-04  2:37 ` [PATCH 06/20] iommu/vt-d: Force requesting ACS when tboot is enabled Lu Baolu
2026-08-04  2:37 ` [PATCH 07/20] iommu/vt-d: Remove dead code when CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU is not set Lu Baolu
2026-08-04  2:37 ` [PATCH 08/20] iommu/vt-d: Consolidate dmar policy management and force_on logic Lu Baolu
2026-08-04  2:37 ` [PATCH 09/20] iommu/vt-d: Use dmar_can_force_on() for platform opt-in Lu Baolu
2026-08-04  2:37 ` [PATCH 10/20] iommu/vt-d: Call dmar_can_force_on() for tboot opt-in Lu Baolu
2026-08-04  2:37 ` [PATCH 11/20] iommu/vt-d: Remove the 'force_on' variable Lu Baolu
2026-08-04  2:37 ` [PATCH 12/20] iommu/vt-d: Remove dmar_disabled Lu Baolu
2026-08-04  2:37 ` [PATCH 13/20] iommu/vt-d: Support the new DMA_REMAP_OPT_OUT flag bit Lu Baolu
2026-08-04  2:37 ` [PATCH 14/20] iommu/vt-d: Cache max domain ID to avoid redundant calculation Lu Baolu
2026-08-04  2:37 ` [PATCH 15/20] iommu/vt-d: Fix copied_tables bitmap leak on error in copy_translation_tables Lu Baolu
2026-08-04  2:37 ` [PATCH 16/20] iommu/vt-d: Fix shift overflow in qi_desc_dev_iotlb_pasid() Lu Baolu
2026-08-04  5:54   ` Baolu Lu
2026-08-04  2:37 ` [PATCH 17/20] iommu/vt-d: Clear Present bit before tearing down copied context entry Lu Baolu
2026-08-04  2:37 ` [PATCH 18/20] iommu/vt-d: Fix iopf_refcount leak on RID domain replacement Lu Baolu
2026-08-04  2:37 ` [PATCH 19/20] iommu/vt-d: Tear down scalable-mode context on probe failure Lu Baolu
2026-08-04  2:37 ` [PATCH 20/20] iommu/vt-d: Flush context cache with correct SID when tearing down aliases Lu Baolu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=04718cf6-3096-4dd3-ab35-48d950998479@linux.intel.com \
    --to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=desnesn@redhat.com \
    --cc=dmantipov@yandex.ru \
    --cc=guanghuifeng@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lirongqing@baidu.com \
    --cc=zhaojinming@uniontech.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox