Linux IOMMU Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
Cc: chegu_vinod-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org,
	dwmw2-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iommu/intel: Exclude devices using RMRRs from IOMMU API domains
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 23:35:03 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1402983303.3707.94.camel@ul30vt.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140613162901.4550.94476.stgit-xdHQ/5r00wBBDLzU/O5InQ@public.gmane.org>

On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 10:30 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> The user of the IOMMU API domain expects to have full control of
> the IOVA space for the domain.  RMRRs are fundamentally incompatible
> with that idea.  We can neither map the RMRR into the IOMMU API
> domain, nor can we guarantee that the device won't continue DMA with
> the area described by the RMRR as part of the new domain.  Therefore
> we must prevent such devices from being used by the IOMMU API.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> ---

David,

Any idea what an off-the-shelf Asus motherboard would be doing with an
RMRR on the Intel HD graphics?

dmar: RMRR base: 0x000000bb800000 end: 0x000000bf9fffff
IOMMU: Setting identity map for device 0000:00:02.0 [0xbb800000 - 0xbf9fffff]

Thanks,

Alex

> v2: consolidate test to a single, well documented function.
> 
>  drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c |   49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> index c4f11c0..253d598 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> @@ -2511,22 +2511,46 @@ static bool device_has_rmrr(struct device *dev)
>  	return false;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * There are a couple cases where we need to restrict the functionality of
> + * devices associated with RMRRs.  The first is when evaluating a device for
> + * identity mapping because problems exist when devices are moved in and out
> + * of domains and their respective RMRR information is lost.  This means that
> + * a device with associated RMRRs will never be in a "passthrough" domain.
> + * The second is use of the device through the IOMMU API.  This interface
> + * expects to have full control of the IOVA space for the device.  We cannot
> + * satisfy both the requirement that RMRR access is maintained and have an
> + * unencumbered IOVA space.  We also have no ability to quiesce the device's
> + * use of the RMRR space or even inform the IOMMU API user of the restriction.
> + * We therefore prevent devices associated with an RMRR from participating in
> + * the IOMMU API, which eliminates them from device assignment.
> + *
> + * In both cases we assume that PCI USB devices with RMRRs have them largely
> + * for historical reasons and that the RMRR space is not actively used post
> + * boot.  This exclusion may change if vendors begin to abuse it.
> + */
> +static bool device_is_rmrr_locked(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	if (!device_has_rmrr(dev))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if (dev_is_pci(dev)) {
> +		struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> +
> +		if ((pdev->class >> 8) == PCI_CLASS_SERIAL_USB)
> +			return false;
> +	}
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  static int iommu_should_identity_map(struct device *dev, int startup)
>  {
>  
>  	if (dev_is_pci(dev)) {
>  		struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
>  
> -		/*
> -		 * We want to prevent any device associated with an RMRR from
> -		 * getting placed into the SI Domain. This is done because
> -		 * problems exist when devices are moved in and out of domains
> -		 * and their respective RMRR info is lost. We exempt USB devices
> -		 * from this process due to their usage of RMRRs that are known
> -		 * to not be needed after BIOS hand-off to OS.
> -		 */
> -		if (device_has_rmrr(dev) &&
> -		    (pdev->class >> 8) != PCI_CLASS_SERIAL_USB)
> +		if (device_is_rmrr_locked(dev))
>  			return 0;
>  
>  		if ((iommu_identity_mapping & IDENTMAP_AZALIA) && IS_AZALIA(pdev))
> @@ -4171,6 +4195,11 @@ static int intel_iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>  	int addr_width;
>  	u8 bus, devfn;
>  
> +	if (device_is_rmrr_locked(dev)) {
> +		dev_warn(dev, "Device is ineligible for IOMMU domain attach due to platform RMRR requirement.  Contact your platform vendor.\n");
> +		return -EPERM;
> +	}
> +
>  	/* normally dev is not mapped */
>  	if (unlikely(domain_context_mapped(dev))) {
>  		struct dmar_domain *old_domain;
> 
> _______________________________________________
> iommu mailing list
> iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-06-17  5:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-13 16:30 [PATCH v2] iommu/intel: Exclude devices using RMRRs from IOMMU API domains Alex Williamson
     [not found] ` <20140613162901.4550.94476.stgit-xdHQ/5r00wBBDLzU/O5InQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-06-17  5:35   ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2014-06-17  7:04     ` David Woodhouse
2014-06-17  7:15       ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  7:21         ` David Woodhouse
2014-06-17  8:14           ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17 12:22       ` Alex Williamson
2014-06-17 12:41         ` David Woodhouse
2014-06-17 13:16           ` Alex Williamson
2014-06-17 13:44             ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17 14:15               ` Alex Williamson
2014-06-17 16:45                 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17 16:59                   ` Alex Williamson
2014-06-17 17:53                     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-18 21:48               ` Alex Williamson
2014-06-19  1:47                 ` Alex Williamson
2014-06-19  6:10                   ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-19 14:29                     ` Alex Williamson
2014-06-19 14:41                       ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1402983303.3707.94.camel@ul30vt.home \
    --to=alex.williamson-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=chegu_vinod-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dwmw2-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox