Linux IOMMU Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, chegu_vinod@hp.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iommu/intel: Exclude devices using RMRRs from IOMMU API domains
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 06:22:37 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1403007757.3707.100.camel@ul30vt.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1402988692.7595.106.camel@i7.infradead.org>

On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 08:04 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-06-16 at 23:35 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > 
> > Any idea what an off-the-shelf Asus motherboard would be doing with an
> > RMRR on the Intel HD graphics?
> > 
> > dmar: RMRR base: 0x000000bb800000 end: 0x000000bf9fffff
> > IOMMU: Setting identity map for device 0000:00:02.0 [0xbb800000 - 0xbf9fffff]
> 
> Hm, we should have thought of that sooner. That's quite normal — it's
> for the 'stolen' memory used for the framebuffer. And maybe also the
> GTT, and shadow GTT and other things; I forget precisely what, and it
> varies from one setup to another.

Why exactly do these things need to be identity mapped through the
IOMMU?  This sounds like something a normal device might do with a
coherent mapping.

> I'd expect fairly much all systems to have an RMRR for the integrated
> graphics device if they have one, and your patch¹ is going to prevent
> assignment of those to guests... as you've presumably noticed.
> 
> I'm not sure if the i915 driver is capable of fully reprogramming the
> hardware to completely stop using that region, to allow assignment to a
> guest with a 'pure' memory map and no stolen region. I suppose it must,
> if assignment to guests was working correctly before?

IGD assignment has never worked with KVM.

> Perhaps the better answer here is not to have the special cases in
> 'device_is_rmrr_locked()', and instead allow a device driver to call a
> 'iommu_release_rmrrs()' function once it's reset the hardware to *stop*
> doing whatever DMA the BIOS set it up with.

IGD supports FLR, which is good, but I would assume an FLR doesn't
necessarily release use of this region and being a root complex device I
don't think we have a bigger hammer reset option.  Thanks,

Alex

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-06-17 12:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-13 16:30 [PATCH v2] iommu/intel: Exclude devices using RMRRs from IOMMU API domains Alex Williamson
     [not found] ` <20140613162901.4550.94476.stgit-xdHQ/5r00wBBDLzU/O5InQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-06-17  5:35   ` Alex Williamson
2014-06-17  7:04     ` David Woodhouse
2014-06-17  7:15       ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17  7:21         ` David Woodhouse
2014-06-17  8:14           ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17 12:22       ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2014-06-17 12:41         ` David Woodhouse
2014-06-17 13:16           ` Alex Williamson
2014-06-17 13:44             ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17 14:15               ` Alex Williamson
2014-06-17 16:45                 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-17 16:59                   ` Alex Williamson
2014-06-17 17:53                     ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-18 21:48               ` Alex Williamson
2014-06-19  1:47                 ` Alex Williamson
2014-06-19  6:10                   ` Daniel Vetter
2014-06-19 14:29                     ` Alex Williamson
2014-06-19 14:41                       ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1403007757.3707.100.camel@ul30vt.home \
    --to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=chegu_vinod@hp.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox