From: John Garry via iommu <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>,
<joro@8bytes.org>, <will@kernel.org>, <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
<martin.petersen@oracle.com>, <hch@lst.de>,
<m.szyprowski@samsung.com>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linuxarm@huawei.com, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] scsi: core: Cap shost max_sectors according to DMA limits only once
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 09:02:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17c90e55-4560-fa37-398a-4de3838704ca@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5f79d8e7-0035-cfb0-d612-3e1c7f243f22@opensource.wdc.com>
On 01/07/2022 00:41, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>>
>> shost->dma_dev = dma_dev;
>>
>> + if (dma_dev->dma_mask) {
>> + shost->max_sectors = min_t(unsigned int, shost->max_sectors,
>> + dma_max_mapping_size(dma_dev) >> SECTOR_SHIFT);
>> + }
> Nit: you could remove the curly brackets... But it being a multi-line
> statement, having them is OK too I think.
>
tglx seems to think that they are ok, and I generally agree (now):
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/877djwdorz.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de/
AFAICT coding-style.rst is ok with them in this scenario too
Cheers,
John
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>,
<joro@8bytes.org>, <will@kernel.org>, <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
<martin.petersen@oracle.com>, <hch@lst.de>,
<m.szyprowski@samsung.com>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>, <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
<iommu@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linuxarm@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] scsi: core: Cap shost max_sectors according to DMA limits only once
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 09:02:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17c90e55-4560-fa37-398a-4de3838704ca@huawei.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20220701080227.rOXDVLc5SttH1Ukfel9eKj2Cp_WX4ZW5J_0EgvfrwGo@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5f79d8e7-0035-cfb0-d612-3e1c7f243f22@opensource.wdc.com>
On 01/07/2022 00:41, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>>
>> shost->dma_dev = dma_dev;
>>
>> + if (dma_dev->dma_mask) {
>> + shost->max_sectors = min_t(unsigned int, shost->max_sectors,
>> + dma_max_mapping_size(dma_dev) >> SECTOR_SHIFT);
>> + }
> Nit: you could remove the curly brackets... But it being a multi-line
> statement, having them is OK too I think.
>
tglx seems to think that they are ok, and I generally agree (now):
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/877djwdorz.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de/
AFAICT coding-style.rst is ok with them in this scenario too
Cheers,
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-01 8:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-30 12:08 [PATCH v5 0/5] DMA mapping changes for SCSI core John Garry via iommu
2022-06-30 12:08 ` John Garry
2022-06-30 12:08 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] dma-mapping: Add dma_opt_mapping_size() John Garry via iommu
2022-06-30 12:08 ` John Garry
2022-06-30 12:08 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] dma-iommu: Add iommu_dma_opt_mapping_size() John Garry via iommu
2022-06-30 12:08 ` John Garry
2022-06-30 12:08 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] scsi: core: Cap shost max_sectors according to DMA limits only once John Garry via iommu
2022-06-30 12:08 ` John Garry
2022-06-30 23:41 ` Damien Le Moal via iommu
2022-06-30 23:41 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-07-01 8:02 ` John Garry via iommu [this message]
2022-07-01 8:02 ` John Garry
2022-06-30 12:08 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] scsi: scsi_transport_sas: Cap shost max_sectors according to DMA optimal limit John Garry via iommu
2022-06-30 12:08 ` John Garry
2022-06-30 23:49 ` Damien Le Moal via iommu
2022-06-30 23:49 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-07-01 8:46 ` John Garry via iommu
2022-07-01 8:46 ` John Garry
2022-06-30 12:08 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] ata: libata-scsi: Cap ata_device->max_sectors according to shost->max_sectors John Garry via iommu
2022-06-30 12:08 ` John Garry
2022-07-06 13:40 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] DMA mapping changes for SCSI core John Garry via iommu
2022-07-06 13:40 ` John Garry
2022-07-06 13:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-06 13:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-07 20:35 ` Martin K. Petersen
2022-07-08 16:17 ` John Garry
2022-07-10 23:08 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-07-11 7:36 ` John Garry
2022-07-11 10:40 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-07-11 14:49 ` John Garry
2022-07-14 3:10 ` Martin K. Petersen
2022-07-14 7:52 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17c90e55-4560-fa37-398a-4de3838704ca@huawei.com \
--to=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox