From: Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
<konrad.wilk-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky
<boris.ostrovsky-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Juergen Gross <jgross-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>,
Stefano Stabellini
<sstabellini-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: xen-devel-GuqFBffKawtpuQazS67q72D2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org,
iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] swiotlb-xen: simplify the DMA sync method implementations
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 09:19:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190411072000.4306-4-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190411072000.4306-1-hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
Get rid of the grand multiplexer and implement the sync_single_for_cpu
and sync_single_for_device methods directly, and then loop over them
for the scatterlist based variants.
Note that this also loses a few comments related to highlevel DMA API
concepts, which have nothing to do with the swiotlb-xen implementation
details.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
---
drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c | 84 +++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
index 97a55c225593..9a951504dc12 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
@@ -455,48 +455,28 @@ static void xen_swiotlb_unmap_page(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
xen_unmap_single(hwdev, dev_addr, size, dir, attrs);
}
-/*
- * Make physical memory consistent for a single streaming mode DMA translation
- * after a transfer.
- *
- * If you perform a xen_swiotlb_map_page() but wish to interrogate the buffer
- * using the cpu, yet do not wish to teardown the dma mapping, you must
- * call this function before doing so. At the next point you give the dma
- * address back to the card, you must first perform a
- * xen_swiotlb_dma_sync_for_device, and then the device again owns the buffer
- */
static void
-xen_swiotlb_sync_single(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
- size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir,
- enum dma_sync_target target)
+xen_swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr,
+ size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir)
{
- phys_addr_t paddr = xen_bus_to_phys(dev_addr);
+ phys_addr_t paddr = xen_bus_to_phys(dma_addr);
- BUG_ON(dir == DMA_NONE);
-
- if (target == SYNC_FOR_CPU)
- xen_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(hwdev, dev_addr, size, dir);
+ xen_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(dev, dma_addr, size, dir);
- /* NOTE: We use dev_addr here, not paddr! */
- if (is_xen_swiotlb_buffer(dev_addr))
- swiotlb_tbl_sync_single(hwdev, paddr, size, dir, target);
-
- if (target == SYNC_FOR_DEVICE)
- xen_dma_sync_single_for_device(hwdev, dev_addr, size, dir);
+ if (is_xen_swiotlb_buffer(dma_addr))
+ swiotlb_tbl_sync_single(dev, paddr, size, dir, SYNC_FOR_CPU);
}
-void
-xen_swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
- size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir)
+static void
+xen_swiotlb_sync_single_for_device(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr,
+ size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir)
{
- xen_swiotlb_sync_single(hwdev, dev_addr, size, dir, SYNC_FOR_CPU);
-}
+ phys_addr_t paddr = xen_bus_to_phys(dma_addr);
-void
-xen_swiotlb_sync_single_for_device(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
- size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir)
-{
- xen_swiotlb_sync_single(hwdev, dev_addr, size, dir, SYNC_FOR_DEVICE);
+ if (is_xen_swiotlb_buffer(dma_addr))
+ swiotlb_tbl_sync_single(dev, paddr, size, dir, SYNC_FOR_DEVICE);
+
+ xen_dma_sync_single_for_device(dev, dma_addr, size, dir);
}
/*
@@ -541,38 +521,30 @@ xen_swiotlb_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sgl, int nelems,
return 0;
}
-/*
- * Make physical memory consistent for a set of streaming mode DMA translations
- * after a transfer.
- *
- * The same as swiotlb_sync_single_* but for a scatter-gather list, same rules
- * and usage.
- */
static void
-xen_swiotlb_sync_sg(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sgl,
- int nelems, enum dma_data_direction dir,
- enum dma_sync_target target)
+xen_swiotlb_sync_sg_for_cpu(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sgl,
+ int nelems, enum dma_data_direction dir)
{
struct scatterlist *sg;
int i;
- for_each_sg(sgl, sg, nelems, i)
- xen_swiotlb_sync_single(hwdev, sg->dma_address,
- sg_dma_len(sg), dir, target);
-}
-
-static void
-xen_swiotlb_sync_sg_for_cpu(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sg,
- int nelems, enum dma_data_direction dir)
-{
- xen_swiotlb_sync_sg(hwdev, sg, nelems, dir, SYNC_FOR_CPU);
+ for_each_sg(sgl, sg, nelems, i) {
+ xen_swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu(dev, sg->dma_address,
+ sg->length, dir);
+ }
}
static void
-xen_swiotlb_sync_sg_for_device(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sg,
+xen_swiotlb_sync_sg_for_device(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sgl,
int nelems, enum dma_data_direction dir)
{
- xen_swiotlb_sync_sg(hwdev, sg, nelems, dir, SYNC_FOR_DEVICE);
+ struct scatterlist *sg;
+ int i;
+
+ for_each_sg(sgl, sg, nelems, i) {
+ xen_swiotlb_sync_single_for_device(dev, sg->dma_address,
+ sg->length, dir);
+ }
}
/*
--
2.20.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] swiotlb-xen: simplify the DMA sync method implementations
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 09:19:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190411072000.4306-4-hch@lst.de> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190411071959.aa07iqqWR9pJ_GTdA0vazkyhxZmQA5P4H0x-mgGfifY@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190411072000.4306-1-hch@lst.de>
Get rid of the grand multiplexer and implement the sync_single_for_cpu
and sync_single_for_device methods directly, and then loop over them
for the scatterlist based variants.
Note that this also loses a few comments related to highlevel DMA API
concepts, which have nothing to do with the swiotlb-xen implementation
details.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c | 84 +++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
index 97a55c225593..9a951504dc12 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
@@ -455,48 +455,28 @@ static void xen_swiotlb_unmap_page(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
xen_unmap_single(hwdev, dev_addr, size, dir, attrs);
}
-/*
- * Make physical memory consistent for a single streaming mode DMA translation
- * after a transfer.
- *
- * If you perform a xen_swiotlb_map_page() but wish to interrogate the buffer
- * using the cpu, yet do not wish to teardown the dma mapping, you must
- * call this function before doing so. At the next point you give the dma
- * address back to the card, you must first perform a
- * xen_swiotlb_dma_sync_for_device, and then the device again owns the buffer
- */
static void
-xen_swiotlb_sync_single(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
- size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir,
- enum dma_sync_target target)
+xen_swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr,
+ size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir)
{
- phys_addr_t paddr = xen_bus_to_phys(dev_addr);
+ phys_addr_t paddr = xen_bus_to_phys(dma_addr);
- BUG_ON(dir == DMA_NONE);
-
- if (target == SYNC_FOR_CPU)
- xen_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(hwdev, dev_addr, size, dir);
+ xen_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(dev, dma_addr, size, dir);
- /* NOTE: We use dev_addr here, not paddr! */
- if (is_xen_swiotlb_buffer(dev_addr))
- swiotlb_tbl_sync_single(hwdev, paddr, size, dir, target);
-
- if (target == SYNC_FOR_DEVICE)
- xen_dma_sync_single_for_device(hwdev, dev_addr, size, dir);
+ if (is_xen_swiotlb_buffer(dma_addr))
+ swiotlb_tbl_sync_single(dev, paddr, size, dir, SYNC_FOR_CPU);
}
-void
-xen_swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
- size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir)
+static void
+xen_swiotlb_sync_single_for_device(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr,
+ size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir)
{
- xen_swiotlb_sync_single(hwdev, dev_addr, size, dir, SYNC_FOR_CPU);
-}
+ phys_addr_t paddr = xen_bus_to_phys(dma_addr);
-void
-xen_swiotlb_sync_single_for_device(struct device *hwdev, dma_addr_t dev_addr,
- size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir)
-{
- xen_swiotlb_sync_single(hwdev, dev_addr, size, dir, SYNC_FOR_DEVICE);
+ if (is_xen_swiotlb_buffer(dma_addr))
+ swiotlb_tbl_sync_single(dev, paddr, size, dir, SYNC_FOR_DEVICE);
+
+ xen_dma_sync_single_for_device(dev, dma_addr, size, dir);
}
/*
@@ -541,38 +521,30 @@ xen_swiotlb_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sgl, int nelems,
return 0;
}
-/*
- * Make physical memory consistent for a set of streaming mode DMA translations
- * after a transfer.
- *
- * The same as swiotlb_sync_single_* but for a scatter-gather list, same rules
- * and usage.
- */
static void
-xen_swiotlb_sync_sg(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sgl,
- int nelems, enum dma_data_direction dir,
- enum dma_sync_target target)
+xen_swiotlb_sync_sg_for_cpu(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sgl,
+ int nelems, enum dma_data_direction dir)
{
struct scatterlist *sg;
int i;
- for_each_sg(sgl, sg, nelems, i)
- xen_swiotlb_sync_single(hwdev, sg->dma_address,
- sg_dma_len(sg), dir, target);
-}
-
-static void
-xen_swiotlb_sync_sg_for_cpu(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sg,
- int nelems, enum dma_data_direction dir)
-{
- xen_swiotlb_sync_sg(hwdev, sg, nelems, dir, SYNC_FOR_CPU);
+ for_each_sg(sgl, sg, nelems, i) {
+ xen_swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu(dev, sg->dma_address,
+ sg->length, dir);
+ }
}
static void
-xen_swiotlb_sync_sg_for_device(struct device *hwdev, struct scatterlist *sg,
+xen_swiotlb_sync_sg_for_device(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sgl,
int nelems, enum dma_data_direction dir)
{
- xen_swiotlb_sync_sg(hwdev, sg, nelems, dir, SYNC_FOR_DEVICE);
+ struct scatterlist *sg;
+ int i;
+
+ for_each_sg(sgl, sg, nelems, i) {
+ xen_swiotlb_sync_single_for_device(dev, sg->dma_address,
+ sg->length, dir);
+ }
}
/*
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-11 7:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-11 7:19 a few xen swiotlb cleanups Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-11 7:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <20190411072000.4306-1-hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
2019-04-11 7:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] swiotlb-xen: make instances match their method names Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-11 7:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <20190411072000.4306-2-hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
2019-04-15 22:55 ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-15 22:55 ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-11 7:19 ` [PATCH 2/4] swiotlb-xen: use ->map_page to implement ->map_sg Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-11 7:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <20190411072000.4306-3-hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
2019-04-15 22:55 ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-15 22:55 ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-11 7:19 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-04-11 7:19 ` [PATCH 3/4] swiotlb-xen: simplify the DMA sync method implementations Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <20190411072000.4306-4-hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
2019-04-15 22:55 ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-15 22:55 ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-11 7:20 ` [PATCH 4/4] swiotlb-xen: ensure we have a single callsite for xen_dma_map_page Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-11 7:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <20190411072000.4306-5-hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
2019-04-15 22:56 ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-15 22:56 ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-25 18:55 ` a few xen swiotlb cleanups Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2019-04-25 18:55 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190411072000.4306-4-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch-jcswghmuv9g@public.gmane.org \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jgross-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sstabellini-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=xen-devel-GuqFBffKawtpuQazS67q72D2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox