public inbox for iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe via iommu <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>
To: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] iommu: iommu_group_claim_dma_owner() must always assign a domain
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 16:14:46 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220518191446.GU1343366@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <183e155eae268c32e7d02f68846250702fe99065.camel@linux.ibm.com>

On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 02:50:36PM -0400, Eric Farman wrote:

> I got a heads up from Matt about the s390 KVM vfio- variants failing on
> linux-next.
> 
> For vfio-ap and vfio-ccw, they fail on the above error. Both calls to
> __iommu_domain_alloc fail because while dev->dev->bus is non-NULL (it
> points to the mdev bus_type registered in mdev_init()), the bus-
> >iommu_ops pointer is NULL. Which makes sense; the iommu_group is vfio-
> noiommu, via vfio_register_emulated_iommu_dev(), and mdev didn't
> establish an iommu_ops for its bus.

Oh, I think this is a VFIO problem, the iommu layer should not have to
deal with these fake non-iommu groups.

From 9884850a5ceac957e6715beab0888294d4088877 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 16:03:34 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] vfio: Do not manipulate iommu dma_owner for fake iommu groups

Since asserting dma ownership now causes the group to have its DMA blocked
the iommu layer requires a working iommu. This means the dma_owner APIs
cannot be used on the fake groups that VFIO creates. Test for this and
avoid calling them.

Otherwise asserting dma ownership will fail for VFIO mdev devices as a
BLOCKING iommu_domain cannot be allocated due to the NULL iommu ops.

Fixes: 0286300e6045 ("iommu: iommu_group_claim_dma_owner() must always assign a domain")
Reported-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/vfio.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

I think this will have to go through Alex's tree due to all the other rework
in this area.

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
index cfcff7764403fc..f5ed03897210c3 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
@@ -927,7 +927,8 @@ static void __vfio_group_unset_container(struct vfio_group *group)
 		driver->ops->detach_group(container->iommu_data,
 					  group->iommu_group);
 
-	iommu_group_release_dma_owner(group->iommu_group);
+	if (group->type == VFIO_IOMMU)
+		iommu_group_release_dma_owner(group->iommu_group);
 
 	group->container = NULL;
 	group->container_users = 0;
@@ -1001,9 +1002,11 @@ static int vfio_group_set_container(struct vfio_group *group, int container_fd)
 		goto unlock_out;
 	}
 
-	ret = iommu_group_claim_dma_owner(group->iommu_group, f.file);
-	if (ret)
-		goto unlock_out;
+	if (group->type == VFIO_IOMMU) {
+		ret = iommu_group_claim_dma_owner(group->iommu_group, f.file);
+		if (ret)
+			goto unlock_out;
+	}
 
 	driver = container->iommu_driver;
 	if (driver) {
@@ -1011,7 +1014,9 @@ static int vfio_group_set_container(struct vfio_group *group, int container_fd)
 						group->iommu_group,
 						group->type);
 		if (ret) {
-			iommu_group_release_dma_owner(group->iommu_group);
+			if (group->type == VFIO_IOMMU)
+				iommu_group_release_dma_owner(
+					group->iommu_group);
 			goto unlock_out;
 		}
 	}
-- 
2.36.0

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-18 19:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-09 16:19 [PATCH v3] iommu: iommu_group_claim_dma_owner() must always assign a domain Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-05-09 22:15 ` Robin Murphy
2022-05-10  0:56 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-05-13 12:54 ` Joerg Roedel
2022-05-18 18:50 ` Eric Farman
2022-05-18 19:14   ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu [this message]
2022-05-18 19:32     ` Eric Farman
2022-05-19  7:32     ` Joerg Roedel
2022-05-19 16:51       ` Alex Williamson
2022-05-19 16:53         ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220518191446.GU1343366@nvidia.com \
    --to=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=quic_qiancai@quicinc.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox