Re: [PATCH v3] iommu: iommu_group_claim_dma_owner() must always assign a domain

From: Jason Gunthorpe via iommu <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com>,
	Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] iommu: iommu_group_claim_dma_owner() must always assign a domain
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 13:53:54 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220519165354.GC1343366@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220519105147.21b0b9d0.alex.williamson@redhat.com>

On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 10:51:47AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 19 May 2022 09:32:05 +0200
> Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 04:14:46PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > Fixes: 0286300e6045 ("iommu: iommu_group_claim_dma_owner() must always assign a domain")
> > > Reported-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> > >  drivers/vfio/vfio.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
> > >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)  
> > 
> > That fix will be taken care of by Alex? Or does it need to go through
> > the IOMMU tree?
> 
> The comment suggested my tree.  Jason, were you planning to post this
> on its own instead of buried in a reply or shall we take it from
> here?

Let me repost it with a proper cc list, I think your tree is best.

Thanks,
Jason
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu